Chris Scoones
01-03-2007, 04:58 AM
It may seam odd to some that I removed a recent thread with the subject “THE POLL VOTE - THE BEST POST OF 2006”. The pole contains a short list of topics discussed in 2006 which based on a few were the “BEST” on WFF. My removal of that thread is my response to the idea that a few of the items on that list should even be considered. Even as a bad joke.
It’s partly in response to the recent discussion on DD and his usage of Nailknots photo taken from the gallery. Clearly I supported Nailknot bringing the subject up given it involved member content, be it info or photos, and what WFF’s visitors should consider regarding the ownership of the content shared here. The topic went beyond acceptable when many hinted at exacting measures against DD, and basically just set upon using the WFF board to exact negative PR retribution. There can be a time for that, I guess, but the response should match the circumstance. In this case attacking an individual before they had the chance to respond offline is, IMO, in poor form. Even though the issue was pretty obvious the fact of it being deliberate and not just a really dumb mistake hadn’t been determined yet. As it turned out it was a dumb mistake.
So that thread on DD made the '06 list in some opinions eh? Okay, well you and I are pretty far apart on this. We’ll just have to leave it at Ibn, Jerry and I will continue to set the rules and direction on this board and we'll do so based on values that serve the entire board and not just a few.
In case you were wondering the photo scavenger thread by Backyard was the best thread of 2006.
Chris
It’s partly in response to the recent discussion on DD and his usage of Nailknots photo taken from the gallery. Clearly I supported Nailknot bringing the subject up given it involved member content, be it info or photos, and what WFF’s visitors should consider regarding the ownership of the content shared here. The topic went beyond acceptable when many hinted at exacting measures against DD, and basically just set upon using the WFF board to exact negative PR retribution. There can be a time for that, I guess, but the response should match the circumstance. In this case attacking an individual before they had the chance to respond offline is, IMO, in poor form. Even though the issue was pretty obvious the fact of it being deliberate and not just a really dumb mistake hadn’t been determined yet. As it turned out it was a dumb mistake.
So that thread on DD made the '06 list in some opinions eh? Okay, well you and I are pretty far apart on this. We’ll just have to leave it at Ibn, Jerry and I will continue to set the rules and direction on this board and we'll do so based on values that serve the entire board and not just a few.
In case you were wondering the photo scavenger thread by Backyard was the best thread of 2006.
Chris