|
At Issue: Paying for
it
Article by Ray Helaers
Some anglers will never pay to fish. They're against it.
They can get their own, thank you very much, and they won't
hire guides, stay in lodges, or pay to fish private water.
Fair enough, I guess. A lot of anglers can't afford it,
and so have no opinion. Most of us have no problem with
it, and can sort of afford it, so we do it. On the other
hand, we don't have money to burn exactly, so we do it rarely.
Then there are chaps who never fish without writing somebody
a check for something.
These are
the guys who maybe fish a dozen days a year, but always
in some place like Belize for Permit, Arctic Russia for
Atlantics, Alaska, or maybe a quick weekend in Montana,
everything always first class. I like looking at the catalogs
for those places; all the Sports are in their fifties and
sixties, all the wives and girlfriends in their twenties
and thirties. There's trophy fishing and then there's trophy
fishing.
You have
to wonder about those guys. They're in the best places,
fishing for the best fish, with the best equipment, and
alongside the best anglers, but they can only fish with
a guide's help. I mean, who wants to be the dude?
Of course most of these swells would never think of themselves
that way. They're paying; they're the boss.
I know
guys who have guided at some of the top dollar lodges in
Bristol Bay and Kamchatka. They say that most of the sports
are of course wealthy, and for the most part pleasant (after
all, they're on vacation), and some of them can even fish.
But every once in a while, some client feels it necessary
to remind his guide that he is "the help." Apparently
it can be nasty.
"They
can be very good at making you feel like shit," one
friend told me.
I don't
even know anybody like that. For me and everybody I know,
a big trip usually means a cheap motel on a do-it-yourselfer
to the Olympic Peninsula, or the upper Skeena drainage,
or southern Idaho. Paying for it means hiring a guide, or
once in a blue moon fishing some private water.
Given my
admittedly modest scale, I do have to say that I've never
regretted spending money to fish. Every time I've hired
a guide or fished a private lake, I caught a bunch of fish
and had a great time. I'm sure if I had more money and spent
it more freely, I'd wind up eventually paying for a bad
trip, but so far I've been lucky.
The first
time I ever hired a guide was on the San Juan River in northern
New Mexico. I was in the Southwest for a family reunion,
and taking ten days to drive around Colorado and New Mexico
in a rented car with Susie. I made myself one day to fish
the San Juan. The river is one of the West's most famous
trophy trout factories, and I didn't want to take any chances.
My brother drove out from San Diego for the reunion and
met us at the little cinder block motel on the river. He
had never flyfished before, and in the morning I was giving
him casting lessons when the guide arrived to pick us up.
The San
Juan is a tail race below the Navajo Dam, a bottom draw,
two hundred foot high red earth berm that creates what is
essentially a gigantic artificial spring creek. The water,
is slow, cold, and rich, full of weeds and bugs. It grows
big fat trout in a hurry. The guide parked under the dam
and we hiked through a wide jungle of willows and reeds
before we reached the water. He rigged us up with tiny midge
larvae imitations, a couple split shots, and strike indicators.
"Cast
right there," he said, indicating a rut in the weeds.
I did what
he said. Within a few seconds, a five pound rainbow was
rushing away from me, my reel purring. It was the first
time I ever saw my flyline backing going away.
He caught us fourteen or so more that day. Jack, who had
never even held a fly rod before, landed six or seven, most
right around five pounds. The guide knew his stuff, and
he was courteous and helpful, tying on all our flies, netting
our fish, running back into the willows to unhook us when
we fouled our backcasts. It was a little like having a caddie.
He only gave me a little attitude, when we were fishing
dries in the afternoon and I was having trouble seeing the
size 22 black midges we were throwing. But we got over that
hump when on the one drift I could see, another five pounder
rose to examine my fly, and turned downstream with it before
sipping it in.
That seems
like the smartest way to spend your money on a guide: a
river you've never seen before and may never fish again,
especially when you only have one day. Great trout water
is rarely easy water. A few days earlier, I fished the South
Platte River outside Denver, another stream famously filled
with a lot of big trout. They were there; I saw them. They
skunked me good. In the course of the day I did manage to
learn some things about the river that I'll never get to
use.
But that's
really the second best use of a guide. Some years ago, I
hired a guide to float me down the Yakima River, the closest
thing I have to home water. I learned more about the river
in that one day than I had fishing it by myself for four
seasons. In the long run, on water you plan on living with,
a guide might actually save you money, certainly time and
frustration.
Then there's the private, so called pay-to-play water. Most
of these things are lakes, though there are some private
spring creeks too, most famously in Montana. Some of the
lakes offer camping or lodging, in some cases very nice
lodging. It can be expensive, and worth it. Some of the
better known private lakes, like at Douglas Lake Ranch in
BC, or Grindstone Lake in Oregon, have reputations for putting
out lots of ten pound trout. They put you up in first class
accommodations, and let you fish all day, but it can cost
upwards of two to three hundred bucks a day. For what you
get, it's not that bad if you've got it.
The smaller
day fisheries that are spread throughout the Northwest usually
run around a hundred a day, just to have someone open the
gate for you. You bring your own float tube, your own tackle,
flies and lunch. You may or may not be guided, but it's
usually not necessary. The one thing they all have in common
is a lot of big fish.
I've only
done this a couple times. Twice at a little day pond near
Seattle, and once at a larger lake in eastern Washington
that provided accommodations. Again, it was all money well
spent.
Dream Lake
is in Snohomish, about an hour north of Seattle. It's only
about five acres, and stiff with fat trout, rainbows and
a few cutts. I mean really fat, upwards of ten, twelve pounds.
I fished it once in winter and once in early spring and
both times caught bigger trout than I've ever seen anywhere
else.
Hudson
Springs Lake is bigger, but still small, about thirty acres,
in the bottom of a little coulee east of Ephrata. A lot
of the day lakes aren't very pretty, but Hudson Springs
is nice. It has a lot of sixteen to twenty inch rainbows,
which you don't have to pay for in eastern Washington, but
a lot of five to ten pounders as well, which are few and
far between on public water, just about anywhere.
In Dream
Lake, Hudson Springs, and all the pay lakes, the big fish
are there because somebody put them there, which gives the
whole enterprise a certain fish in a barrel aspect, particularly
on the small water. It's amazing how that feeling goes away
when your flyline is absolutely rigid, shearing away from
you with a little triangle of water standing behind it,
making a noise like somebody pulling a broomstick through
the water.
It does
make me qualify things, though. The biggest trout I ever
landed was at Dream Lake, about eight pounds. But it doesn't
count as much as the four and a half pounder I took one
evening at Chopaka, without anybody's help. I'm no dude,
after all. Of course that fish had been stocked as a fingerling
by WDFW, supported in part with my license fees. You get
what you pay for, I guess.
|