Biologists monitoring fish runs after Oso slide

Discussion in 'Steelhead' started by Andrew Lawrence, Apr 25, 2014.

  1. DARRINGTON — Fisheries biologist Pete Verhey waded through the cold, clear creek that feeds into the North Fork Stillaguamish River, scanning riffles and side channels looking for evidence of fish eggs.

    "We got one!" he shouted, pulling pink tape from his waders and marking the spot where a steelhead trout had buried eggs in the gravel.

    The redd, or spawning nest, is an encouraging sign that steelhead trout may be making their way upstream from Oso — above where a massive landslide decimated a riverside neighborhood a month ago and pushed several football fields worth of sediment down the hillside and across the river.

    As search crews continue to look for two missing people in the slide, scientists also are closely monitoring how the slide is affecting federally endangered fish runs, including Chinook salmon and steelhead.

    It's too early to know the slide's long-term effects, but so far scientists are hopeful about the immediate prospects: Adult steelhead are spawning in clear waters above the slide area, and typical numbers of baby fish are migrating downstream to the marine waters.

    "It's still a human tragedy, and we're respectful of that," said Jenni Whitney, a district fish biologist with the state Department of Fish and Wildlife. "We're doing our best to monitor fish because eventually people will want to know."

    Water sample tests also have turned up low levels of fecal coliform, nitrates and other pollutants, easing concerns about chemical contamination for people and fish, said Dick Walker, a senior spill responder with the Department of Ecology.

    The Stillaguamish, which runs from the North Cascades into Puget Sound, once had legendary runs of wild steelhead and Chinook salmon. Western novelist Zane Grey fished its creeks nearly a century ago and described one as the most beautiful trout water he'd ever seen.

    The river has long drawn fly fishermen who try their hand at hooking a prized summer-run steelhead. But decades of urban and other pressures have greatly reduced fish runs. Sediment from landslides, logging, development and other activities has always been a challenge for fish in the river.

    The state and Stillaguamish Tribe were already in the midst of years-long efforts to monitor and restore fish runs when the slide struck. That wealth of historical data will help them gauge future changes.

    A few days after the March 22 slide, biologists working with the tribe saw a spike in dead juvenile salmon migrating out to Puget Sound. They saw more deaths than usual in its smolt trap, essentially a water wheel in the river near Stanwood that allows scientists to trap, count, measure and then release baby fish.

    "We were really concerned the first few days," but it was an isolated event, said Jason Griffith, a fisheries biologist with the tribe.

    The slide had temporarily dammed up the river, and he and others were initially worried that the dam could break. A flash flood warning issued downstream of the slide was in effect for the first few days.

    Once the river cut a channel and pushed through, a ton of silt began moving downstream. Downstream, water turned murky and grey. Muddy water makes it difficult for fish to survive. Sediment can damage fish gills and make it harder for fish to see their food.

    Fish holding in pools near the area of the slide and any eggs in the gravel at the time likely were damaged, said Fish and Wildlife's Whitney. "This is a natural occurrence, but it is pretty hard on fish habitat," she added.

    "It's hard to know how long it will take for sediment to move out of system, and how long it will take for (fish) to return. How will it affect fish long into the future?"

    Those are some questions scientists hope to answer as they continue monitoring fish in the months and years to come.

    Fish have evolved over thousands of years to deal with slides, heavy sediment and other harsh conditions, Griffith said. "They're resilient enough that they're coming back as they have for thousands of years."

    Still, scientists won't know for some time the full effects of the slide. Fish may have gone out to sea in a weakened state, or other fish may have died that weren't caught in the tribe's smolt trap, he said. The next several years of adult fish surveys may reveal more, he said.

    On a recent afternoon, Whitney and Verhey walked a mile of Squire Creek, a tributary of the North Fork Stillaguamish River, looking for bright patches of gravel where a steelhead might have rolled over rocks while digging a nest for its eggs.

    "That white patch of gravel, that could be a redd," Verhey called over to Whitney.

    They found a few redds the previous week and would find more in coming days. They'll also continue to do fish surveys as Chinook, coho and other salmon return later this fall.

    Bill Blake, co-chair of the Stillaguamish Watershed Council who lives downstream from the slide area, said the immediate concern is to help families who suffered from the landslide and other recovery efforts.

    He said: "How do we do this right to make sure the steelhead population is better than ever? But that's after we've done what it takes to help the families."

    http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20140424/NEWS01/140429434/1134/The-fate-of-fish
     
  2. I thought that was respectfully written, considering that some people simply will not understand the importance that many of us place on fish/fishing.
     
  3. I agree Josh.
     
  4. That the river quickly made a cut and started flowing at stable levels was a bonus on what has otherwise been a tragedy. As stated, I'm sure all of the NW rivers have persevered through similar slide events in their long history.
     
  5.  
  6. New to your board and kind of new to fly fishing.Not new to fishing or the Olympic peninsula.I have zero time on any west side cascade rivers.I grew up on the Hood canal.I have watched the wdfw Kill those streams with bad management.Even a c arpenter with a high school degree could see that path they were blazing was going to lead our beloved fish........ON TO THE ENDANGERED SPECIES LIST.I use caps here because I believe that is the goal.Why?As long as they can blame the effects of man kind on the environment, not their blatant mismanagement,the state government receives a lot of money that it does not have to go through you to get.It gets to do damn near anything it wants to as long as it is in the name of the environment.
    I have seen these fish traps on the lower Duckabush river...With dead smolt in them.They were dead because the guy getting paid,with said money,did not check the trap for four days.When he did show up I went over to say hi.Nice enough fellow.Long story short,he was quite proud of the money he and his wife were making as bios chasing the endangered species act.His wife was getting paid to sit out on the coast looking for the marbled something or other.I left wondering if my beloved fish were in the care of somebody that was out for their best interest or somebody with no incentive to ever succeed in healthy fish populations.Is trapping and handling every smolt they can really helping our fish?I here talk of radio tag smolt not making it out of the straights,may it be the radio tags,the tagging procedure weakening them?I used to live right next to a fish trap out on the west end.There was no love there at all for our fish there either.Years ago I spent some time out at the fed hatchery in Quilicene clipping addys on summer run chum.These chums were brood from the Union river fish trap.I took the job just for insight.They were clipping them so that bios could tell if a red had a brood stock fish or wild.They killed easily 30% of these smolt during the clipping.

    I got to go to go to work but I leave wondering,asking the question, if finger fing every fish they can is in the best interest of the fish or the money stream.

    /
     

Share This Page