Critique me

Discussion in 'Fly Tying' started by Jason Copas, May 28, 2014.

  1. jjaims

    jjaims Make fishin’ your mission

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Tacoma
    I like the wired stone. I've just recently tied some up because they seem like they will sink super fast. Tie on a smaller nymph behind an dredge! Great looking ties in my opinion.
     
  2. troutdopemagic

    troutdopemagic Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    429
    Likes Received:
    145
    Location:
    Lake Stevens, Washington
    The wings might be a little tall. Same with the hackle but it could just be the picture. Other then that good job. Far better then my first attempt.
     
  3. Jason Copas

    Jason Copas Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    13

    They are super heavy. I'm pretty sure I could cast one on a light/ultra-light gear rod. About scared to try it on one of my fly rods.
     
  4. jjaims

    jjaims Make fishin’ your mission

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2013
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Tacoma
    I've never broke a fly rod casting heavier fly's. I cast streamers with my 4wt in certain situations . It's not ideal but It's possible. I've broke many gear rods though. Mostly salmon fishing. I have a lot of confidence in my rods.
     
  5. FT

    FT Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Messages:
    1,264
    Likes Received:
    110
    Location:
    Burlington, WA
    "Catskill style" dry flies, if tied with hackle tip wings like some of them use, is tied as you describe and tied on these flies. "Catskill style" dries use hackle that is about 1.25 times hook gap length and that is tied with 3 wraps behind the wing, 2 in front. They also have the wings about hook shank in length. Their tails are also on the sparse side. In other words, "Catskill style" dries are 'lightly dressed', which means sparse.
     
  6. Jason Copas

    Jason Copas Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2012
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    13
    I have to admit I generally don't try to stay true to specific "styles". I'll find a technique I like, such as the wings, and use it wherever. Mainly because I can't seem to remember the specifics for the recipes to well.

    Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk
     
  7. GAT

    GAT Dumbfounded

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    4,973
    Likes Received:
    3,283
    Location:
    Willamette Valley, OR
    The formula for tying Catskill style patterns is simply a starting point. The fish don't give a damn. There's also a formula for wet flies and even nymphs, streamers and Atlantic salmon style patterns.

    Here's the formulas for a traditional dry fly and nymph and they only make a difference to humans and even then, only if you enter a fly tying competition... or if you're anal retentive. There's also formulas for a traditional wet fly, streamer and Atlantic Salmon style patterns.

    Dry fly:
    Wing: twice the length of the hook gape
    Body: Extends from the bass of the wing to just above the hook barb and should taper towards the tail
    Rib: Even spirals of four or five turns
    Hackle: Fibers should extend a half to twice the hook gape
    Tail: Fibers extend one and a half times the body length or twice the hook gape
    Head: Equal to the length of the hook eye

    Nymph:
    Body: Two-thirds or half the length of the hook shank
    Thorax: Half or one third the length of the hook shank or longer for larger nymph representations
    Rib: Four turns unless a long shank hook is used
    Hackle: Equal to the hook gape
    Tail: One third the length of the hook shank
    Head: Equal to the length of the hook eye

    (the formula for a traditional style Atlantic Salmon style pattern goes on and on and on)

    When you think about it, artificial fly patterns don't usually look anything close to the actual bug so what difference does it really make? I've yet to see any mayfly dun that looks remotely close to a traditional dry fly. I'm not sure why the Catskill patterns are tied as they are. Did they even look at a real dun or just come up with a theory design?

    The actual bug (notice the length of the wing is actually longer than the abdomen and thorax):

    Mayfly.jpg


    First off, the hackle feathers do not hold the front of the pattern off the surface of the water -- they sink. The tail is basically worthless because most mayfly duns have very long, one or two split tail fibers... not a clump of fibers.

    The formula for a nymph is closer but all the natural nymphs I've collected have a thorax area half the size of the entire bug, not just the front third... I don't know what that came from:

    37174588.jpg

    So, while the formulas give you a starting point, they only really make a difference to the eye of a human when tying an artificial fly.
     
    jjaims likes this.

Share This Page