Flawed rationale in WSC's proposed boat bans? (Part 1)

Discussion in 'Steelhead' started by ChrisC, Sep 15, 2012.

  1. hydrological

    hydrological beads are NOT flies and snagging is just ghetto

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    115
    Location:
    inland
    wow, in montana i spend close to 800 bucks. 3 different agencies, plus the required liability insurance, before i can even start my season. at least WA is guide friendly :D
     
  2. Chris Johnson

    Chris Johnson Member: Native Fish Society

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,081
    Likes Received:
    478
    Location:
    Bellingham Wa.
    Did you read the proposed rule changes? They do not suggest banning all boats. They propose no fishing from a boat, in relatively small sections of the rivers in question, from feb1 until Nov. 30 ( O.P. rivers). People don't like change, but like it or not it's coming. I am thankful we have organizations like WSC that are being pro-active in trying to save not only the fishery, but the fish from disaster.
     
  3. Evan Burck

    Evan Burck Fudge Dragon

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,600
    Media:
    61
    Likes Received:
    1,806
    Location:
    Duvall, wa
    Home Page:
    Has there ever been a rule proposal to WDFW for stricter requirements for guides?
     
  4. Salmo_g

    Salmo_g Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2004
    Messages:
    8,243
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Location:
    Your City ,State
    Yes. The departmental response was "caveat emptor." The department doesn't think it should get involved in regulating business beyond what is necessary for conservation. However, they don't apply that philosophy to all aspects of fish management.

    Sg
     
    Bob Triggs likes this.

Share This Page