Giorgio Benecchi & Orvis thread sizes.

Discussion in 'Fly Tying' started by TheShadKing, Dec 11, 2004.

  1. TheShadKing

    TheShadKing Will Fish For Food

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Bellevue, WA
    I have determined that by volume, Giorgio Benecchi's 10/0 is basically the same size as Orvis's 8/0.

    I still like the GB thread significantly better, because it feels considerably stronger, especially under friction, than the Orvis ... roughly equivalent to Danville's 6/0 ... of course this is a completely subjective measurement ... like how frequently the Orvis thread shreds and breaks when I'm tying with it. :mad:

    Again non-scientifically -- because I don't have any full bobbins of Danville's threads -- the GB 10/0 does appear to be significantly smaller than the Danville 6/0 -- but only based on how small the heads on my flies end up being.

    My work follows.

    Hokay -- y'all forgive me for this, but sometimes my engineering side overcomes my native laziness and I end up doing research that may be useful for somebody. I was getting really annoyed with the Orvis thread, and was curious to know whether or not part of the issue was the size of the thread, or the multi-stranded nature of GB's thread.

    An Excell spreadsheet of the below data is available to anybody who wants it, just PM me.

    Having just bought some new bobbin spools for my Norlander automatic bobbin, I happen to have two empty thread spools, one Orvis and one GB. I measured the height & diameter of each spool at several locations around the spool.

    I did the same measurement at several locations of one spool each of Orvis 8/0 and 10/0, and GB 10/0.

    It is interesting but probably of no relevance that the Orvis spools are not very round, but the thread is very evenly spooled. The GB is the opposite -- very round spool but the thread is not evenly spooled -- hills and valleys.

    Since I did not think to do this experiment before spooling the thread, my work suffers from a potential issue in that the size of the spools of the measured threads may be different from the empty spools. I’ll update these results when I spool the thread … something I probably won’t do with the Orvis thread because I just basically can’t stand tying with it.

    As a last step, I converted the GB to a 100 yard equivalent -- it's a 100 meter spool. The average of my measurements – all figures in inches / cubic inches – are:

    Orvis thread spool width ...... 0.978
    Orvis thread spool height ..... 0.909
    GB thread spool width ......... 0.807
    GB thread spool height ........ 1.091

    .............................Width .. Volume
    ---------------------------------------------
    Orvis 8/0 ............... 1.011 ... 0.030
    Orvis 10/0 ............. 0.995 ... 0.016
    Average GB 10/0 .... 0.837 ... 0.033
    GB 10/0 100 yds .... 0.766 ... 0.030

    Rolland
     
  2. Norm Frechette

    Norm Frechette Googlemeister

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2004
    Messages:
    653
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    139
    Location:
    Norwich, CT
    WOW! :confused: I'm at a loss for words! What does that prove?
     
  3. TheShadKing

    TheShadKing Will Fish For Food

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Bellevue, WA
    Uh, I wasn't really trying :ray1: to prove anything ... I was simply doing a quick comparison to satisfy my intellectual curiosity and to see if my :beathead: utter failure to be able to tie with Orvis's 10/0 (which, as probably wasn't clear above I was breaking ... not the 8/0) was due to my inability bawling: or perhaps the threads really weren't the same size.

    I'm happy to report ... that Orvis 10/0 is in fact half the size of Orvis 8/0 ... which is the same size as Benecchi's 10/0.

    Maybe that helps?


    Rolland
     
  4. Old Man

    Old Man Just an Old Man

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2002
    Messages:
    23,457
    Media:
    29
    Likes Received:
    2,572
    Location:
    Dillon, Mt
    Boy,I'm sure glad that I'm a simple tyier. I use Danville 6/0 and 8/0. don't use 12/0 because I'm to hard of a puller. But 8/0 makes a very small head for my type of tying.

    Jim
     
  5. Norm Frechette

    Norm Frechette Googlemeister

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2004
    Messages:
    653
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    139
    Location:
    Norwich, CT
    Phew! I guess thats why I tie strictly with 8/0 UNI thread. Nothing else to worry about.
     
    Joe Goodfellow likes this.
  6. Zen Piscator

    Zen Piscator Supporting wild steelhead, gravel to gravel.

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    3,076
    Media:
    551
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    Missoula, MT
    Home Page:
    Benecchi thread is the best type i have ever used. I have placed an order for 5 more spools today. It is a gel spun thread so it is very very strong for its size.

    Peace,
    Andy
     
  7. Tim Cottage

    Tim Cottage Formerly tbc1415

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    1,794
    Likes Received:
    340
    Location:
    Outer Duvall
    KevinLS likes this.
  8. TheShadKing

    TheShadKing Will Fish For Food

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Bellevue, WA
    That's a good article.

    There's now only two things about thread I don't understand. :confused:

    1.) Why denier is proposed as a thread measurement ... when denier is a weight measurement ... and therefore can't be used to compare threads of different materials.

    2.) Why, when I repeated my experiment with the GB 12/0, did it show that my GB 12/0 was just slightly larger than the GB 10/0. :eek:

    Actually, I'm now convinced that the thread stops used by the manufacturers are probably mechanical, i.e., like the ones on most sewing machines, and if I really care to find the thickness of a given thread, I'm actually going to have to measure the length of said thread.

    The good news is that I'm getting better at both the Orvis 10/0 and the GB 12/0 for my size 20 mayfly ... which is looking pretty good ... I just need some trout to do durability testing on. :beer2:


    Rolland
     
  9. Kent Lufkin

    Kent Lufkin Remember when you could remember everything?

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    7,163
    Media:
    54
    Likes Received:
    1,248
    Location:
    Not sure
    There was an interesting article along this same line in a recent issue of Fly Tyer. The author stated a compelling case for a standardized measure of thread diameter from ALL manufacturers. If I remember correctly, he measured thread marked the same size (ie. 6/0) from a variety of makers and found that each one was a different size.

    K
     
  10. TheShadKing

    TheShadKing Will Fish For Food

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Bellevue, WA
    Right -- I saw that article.

    The author is one of the people who suggest denier as a standard measurement ... which, one again, I don't get since you can't use it across thread types (e.g., nylon vs. polyester, or worse, a blend.)


    Rolland
     
  11. Davy

    Davy Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,031
    Media:
    119
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    SIlverton, OR
    Has anyone used the Gudebrod 10/0 ?? The colors sure seem a good match for alot of the small fly hatches in NoCal.thanks.
     
  12. Bob Triggs

    Bob Triggs Stop Killing Wild Steelhead!

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    4,241
    Media:
    1
    Likes Received:
    1,014
    Location:
    Olympic Peninsula
    Home Page:
    I think that Orvis thread IS Uni thread. :confused:
     
  13. CaptAhab

    CaptAhab New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  14. CaptAhab

    CaptAhab New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2013
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    I must apologize; I am not a computer person.
    Is the Excell spreadsheet, to which referred in your 12/11/2004 submission, still available?
    If so, how should I email/contact you to request a copy?
    Thank you,
    CaptAhab
     
  15. silvercreek

    silvercreek Active Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2012
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    288
    You asked why use denier? Because for identical materials, the denier standard correlates with breaking strength for true diameter better than the "/0 Aught" size system which has no standard for what an "/0 Aught" measures.

    Threads are like hooks. Each manufacturer seems to have it's own system for labeling. I like the Denier system rather than the "/0 Aught" system because that is consistent with thread mass. One manufacturer's 8/O is another manufacturer's 11/0. Same diameter but the 11/0 makes you think it is thinner and has less mass.

    One company that plays this game in tippet labeling is Varivas. A 9X tippet should be .002" diameter and a 11X tippet is nonexistent since X size is defined as .011 " - X size/1000 = tippet diameter. Why then does Varivas have a 11X and 12X tippet and their other tippets are thicker than the definition?

    Varivas Tippet

    A tying thread company that does that is Bennichi. Note that their 12/0 is about 70 denier as is Uni 8/0 and Gudebrod 8/0, all are polyester and have about the same breaking strength ay 15 oz. For GSP threads - Wapsi 50 GSP, Unicord 12/0, and Benecchi Ultra Strong all at 50 denier and near identical strength.

    There is no free lunch in threads when identical materials are used. You will notice that threads made from identical materials of the same denier have near identical strengths from manufacturer to manufacturer.

    Denier determines strength and diameter regardless of what the "Aught" diameter labeling says.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    I choose thread based on whether the thread is flat or twisted, on material and denier which determines diameter and strength.