HISTORICAL RECORD OF FISH RELATED ISSUES ON THE SKAGIT RIVER

Discussion in 'Steelhead' started by Andrew Lawrence, Jan 27, 2014.

  1. Andrew Lawrence

    Andrew Lawrence Active Member

  2. Chris Johnson

    Chris Johnson Member: Native Fish Society

    Great recourse Andrew, thank you.
     
  3. KerryS

    KerryS Ignored Member

    I know Larry a little. Nice guy. A geek's geek. I agree with most of what he writes but I think he suffers from old white guy syndrome. However much I may agree that nets do not belong in the river I have to strongly disagree gill netting the river is as big a contributing factor to the decline of salmon in the Skagit as he says it is. I do agree that the dams do far more damage to the river and its fish then the dam operators say the do.
     
  4. Chris Johnson

    Chris Johnson Member: Native Fish Society

    " old white guy syndrome" big gut, no ass?
     
  5. KerryS

    KerryS Ignored Member

    No, OWGS ~ blames indians for the collapse of salmon runs on the Skagit. Won't admit that logging, daming, development, and diking are the major causes of the collaspe. Although Larry does admit these other causes are some of the reasons for the declining runs he still clings to the idea that netting is the major cause; it is not and as soon as we get over that the more we can focus on the issues that are causing the decline.
     
    Chris Johnson, bennysbuddy and smc like this.
  6. Bryce Levin

    Bryce Levin previously upsfisher

    Does anyone know of anything similar to this pertaining to the Skykomish/Snohomish river system?
     
  7. Andrew Lawrence

    Andrew Lawrence Active Member

    I am not aware of anything similar for the Skykomish River / Snohomish. However, it would be pretty interesting if there was.
     
  8. Chris Johnson

    Chris Johnson Member: Native Fish Society

    I'm with ya on that Kerry!
     
  9. Salmo_g

    Salmo_g Active Member

    Kunzler has a fantastic historic report pertaining to Skagit River flood issues.

    I agree Kerry, he has OWGS. He's wrong. The data say so. You'd think a data geek would be persuaded by the data.