Discussion in 'Cast & Blast' started by andrew, Oct 26, 2009.

  1. Maybe you missed my point on this issue, maybe I wasn't clear enough. Here it is:

    A total statewide ban on lead shot is not necessary. Most forest grouse hunting, which is 90 percent of what I do, puts so little shot into the environment it's not funny. And it takes place where no waterfowl feed. So the possibility of lead poisoning is next to zero.

    But my fear is the state will ignore good sense and do what makes the warm and fuzzies happy. Because in the end it's all about getting re-elected next term.

    As far as the lead now in the environment in waterfowl areas, not much I can do. However I do use bismuth in any posted non-tox area, several of which are in the Okanogan valley around the river. I don't have a problem with sensible designation of no-tox areas. I abide by all hunting and firearms laws...that's how I roll.

    BTW, I have a souce for bismuth shot at around 16 to 17 bucks a pound. I load my own to avoid the high cost of commercial ammo. I'm also sitting on several bags of lead in various sizes of shot that I use to reload with. I load as light as I can and still have effective shots that drop birds reliably.

    Scary as it might seem we're all reading from the same book, we're just on different pages...
  2. Anyone care to explain the difference between lead in shot and lead salts? Say how bioavailable it is in its many forms? How does lead in the form of shot, ground in the gizzard get across the gut wall? What form does it take to get through?

    Anyone care to explain why the ammo manufacturers and USFWS are the ones pushing for the lead bans... and why the early results vary so radically between their studies and the rest?

    How do you know the birds you find are suffering from lead poisoning? Why do they only seem to show up sick that way in hunting season? Have you tried to find them in the spring or summer in the same areas? At the mortality rate you describe there is no way there could possibly be a duck left.

    PS Much of my post-graduate work just may have involved some of these questions...
  3. When all you have for a tool is a hammer everything looks like a nail...

    If goverment is good at anything it is "curing" everything and everybody with the same carpet bombing.

    I am glad I left WA 30 years ago... It would drive me nuts today.
  4. Roper,
    You touched on the issue I struggle with and that is cost. If I had a source for bismuth at the price you stated I would take a 50 lbs today. I would love to load my own non-tox shells but I'm not precise or dedicated enough with steel to do it. (high pressure concerns, etc). By chance, can you share your source?

    Xdog: I wouldn't hesitate to use steel for all of my hunting if I was presented with unbiased research that clearly demonstrates significant negative impact of lead shot in the environment. I will read your sources and get back to you. As indicated above, the cost of GOOD quality steel loads is higher than lead. I truly believe that there is a quiet, background movement by government to disarm the citizens of this country, tiny piece by tiny piece. Making hunting too expensive and limiting available areas is one part of that movement. I didn't feel this way 10 years ago. I guess I'm older now and see a pattern. By the way I worked as a professional biologist for state and federal governments for 10 years. Please provide me info on these issues if you have it. I appreciate your input.

    "Here's your coffee. Be careful it's really hot...oh, hell, mallards..."
  5. duplicate post, sorry.....

  6. I guess I did miss your point because what I got and get repeatedly is this is all a Bull Shit agenda brought forth by the warm and fuzzies.

    I fully support the idea of a statewide ban and I can assure you I am neither warm nor fuzzy.

    I would be inclined to agree forest grouse hunting contributes little if anything to the problem. I do how ever believe grouse hunting represents a small percentage of what what bird hunters actively pursue. Further where do you draw the line if not a statewide ban? How close to waterways can you shoot lead? You say above 90 percent of what you hunt is forest grouse, how about the other ten percent is it okay to shoot lead then? You said in your Poodle post you missed a opportunity to shoot a Pheasant over a creek, is it okay to shoot lead then? What about other hunters do you expect to continue to allow lead use and none of it will end up in waterways? I speculate some upland birds likley succumb to lead poisoning as well even though I have not personally seen or no evidence of this, what if maybe just maybe that is true?

    I believe since you dont see a problem it likely isnt there, I am telling you I have seen it
    firsthand. As I said earlier I wish I could send you every poisoned cripple I found and you can watch them die or you can wring thier necks knowing that quite possibly a Eagle, Hawk, or other predator will be eating it by the afternoon will the possibilty of being poisoned as well. I eat approximately 300-500 ducks a year how many of those birds might be in the early stages of lead poisoning? To me lead poisoning is very real which is why when I see a thread like this I am willing to to try to enlighten (which is likely a fools errand).

    On a personal level I belong and donate to Ducks Unlimited, Delta Waterfowl, Washington Waterfowlers, and Pheasants Unlimited. All these are good organizations working to ensure a hunting future largely by creating and maintaining habitat. It pisses me off to think of how some of the bird production gains they make every year that I in a very small way bought and paid for are negated because we continue to deposit more lead into enviroment. Its like the billions of dollars including some of mine that we spend to save the Salmon and yet we allow indiscriminate commercial netting to continue, why?

    Shooting non tox may be painful at first but it is a small price to pay, I chose to shoot non tox at least 15 years ago, partly because of reasons mention, mostly cause I got tired of forgotten lead loads from yesterdays afternoon pheasant hunt found in my pocket on the next mornings waterfowl hunt which made me a accidental poacher.

    Here is a simple reason why a statewide and really a federal ban is necessary. Today you and I or anybody else can go down to any waterway and shoot lead as long as we arent hunting waterfowl. Heck it is perfectly legal for me to go down to Skagit Bay and and shoot hundreds of lead rounds into the bay every day of the year if I like.

    I wont draw out the arguement any longer I doubt I could ever change your stance on the issue any more than you could change mine. I can hope I given you and others some pause for thought.

    Tight lines and happy hunting Gentlemen,

  7. Finally, we agree...:clown: I've been thinking all along...:thumb: Wanna buy some bismuth?
  8. xdog
    Good move skipping the questions I asked if your intent is to remain close-minded.

    "...I belong and donate to Ducks Unlimited..."

    Would gladly bet I can show receipts for personal donations over the last decade in excess of your annual salary. I strongly believe in their habitat enhancement programs.
  9. Hap,

    You elude to the fact that lead in the form used in hunting does not impact wildlife when ingested correct? Rather it needs to be in a salt form.

    Are there not examples of bullets being left inside shooting victims?

    Are you saying the banning of lead is not based on sound science? (not that the government would ever do something like that)

    Please enlighten me.

  10. Bismuth weights and cotton gill nets instead of lead and monofilament nets for the lower Skagit tribe, don't think they'll go for it. I can see it for bird hunting though
  11. I intended and still intend to address you questions as best I can, I just ran out of time I am trying to get some work done so I can go hunting!

    Stand by dammit please~


Share This Page