Macro

Discussion in 'Photography / Video' started by Brady Burmeister, Jun 18, 2014.

  1. Brady Burmeister Active Member

    Posts: 551
    OH
    Ratings: +132 / 0
    Have any of you fellas gotten into macro? I'd love to see your shots.

    I'll kick it off.
    orange fly.JPG

    10352784_10202930198074877_2593233932838684173_n.jpg

    photo 2.JPG
    photo 3.JPG
  2. James New Member

    Posts: 23
    Pacific North West
    Ratings: +1 / 0
    Very Nice!!!
    Tough subjects to shoot due to very limited depth of field!
    Brady Burmeister likes this.
  3. Brady Burmeister Active Member

    Posts: 551
    OH
    Ratings: +132 / 0
    Yeah, these are all single shots. Eventually I hope to get into focus stacking so I can get better DOF but a steady hand can be very difficult with these fast moving guys.
  4. James New Member

    Posts: 23
    Pacific North West
    Ratings: +1 / 0
    Agreed....very nice work....love to see some more of your exploits!
  5. Brady Burmeister Active Member

    Posts: 551
    OH
    Ratings: +132 / 0
    We had the big hex hatch yesterday.
    IMGP4218.jpg
    Gary Knowels likes this.
  6. James New Member

    Posts: 23
    Pacific North West
    Ratings: +1 / 0
    Amazing....if you don't mind? What is your setup?
    I've never done anything this "macro", but I'd be interested in trying.
    Thanks again for sharing.
  7. Brady Burmeister Active Member

    Posts: 551
    OH
    Ratings: +132 / 0
    Pentax K-30. I play around with various tube and lens setups. This picture, and most often, I'm using an old Pentax A-series 100mm f4 macro lens, 49mm coupler, and an old M-series 50mm f4 macro mounted in reverse. A 100mm coupled to a reverse 50mm gives you 2:1 magnification. I think the fruit fly (second pic from the top) was those two lenses mounted on about 55mm of extension tubes. That gets more like 3:1 magnification. You definitely don't need to spend big dollars on lenses. And auto focus is pretty useless anyway at this magnification. A $10 set of extension tubes and an old 50 mm manual lens mounted in reverse can get you good shots.
  8. KerryS Ignored Member

    Posts: 6,701
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    Ratings: +1,744 / 0
    Nice!

    I do a little macro work but I am not into anything like your setup. I have an Tamron 90mm macro lens I picked up off of craigslist for a few bucks that I will bolt on once in awhile. I can't get anything like your shots.

    [IMG]
    Brady Burmeister likes this.
  9. Brady Burmeister Active Member

    Posts: 551
    OH
    Ratings: +132 / 0
    That Tamron has a good rep and is a good value among AF Macro lenses.
  10. Kenneth Yong Member

    Posts: 172
    Rome, Italy
    Ratings: +110 / 0
    I'm not into photography per se, but I will sometimes take photos when I'm out scuba diving. Below are a few taken on an HP R817 in normal or super macro mode (closest focus at about an inch), with mainly manual exposure settings. Not as sharp or as uniformly well-lit as I would like, but not too bad for a point and shoot.

    [IMG]

    [IMG]

    [IMG]

    [IMG]

    [IMG]

    [IMG]

    [IMG]

    Kenneth
    creekx, cabezon and Brady Burmeister like this.
  11. Brady Burmeister Active Member

    Posts: 551
    OH
    Ratings: +132 / 0
    Good stuff!


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. KerryS Ignored Member

    Posts: 6,701
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    Ratings: +1,744 / 0
  13. KerryS Ignored Member

    Posts: 6,701
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    Ratings: +1,744 / 0
    Yeah, it will do a decent job. I usually shoot it manual focus and use live view.

    [IMG]
  14. KerryS Ignored Member

    Posts: 6,701
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    Ratings: +1,744 / 0
    Hey Brady, not to derail your thread but have you ever used photo stacking software like Helicon Focus?
  15. Brady Burmeister Active Member

    Posts: 551
    OH
    Ratings: +132 / 0
    Not derailed at all.

    I have not. I did download CombineZP cause it's free but I've yet to use it. I do everything handheld with live subjects at the moment and getting enough pics at slightly different DOF's to stack has been difficult so far. I definitely hope to progress to that eventually. Lots of people seem to like Helicon.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  16. Brady Burmeister Active Member

    Posts: 551
    OH
    Ratings: +132 / 0
    More mayfly eyes, and a moth.
    IMGP4321.jpg
    IMGP4372.jpg
    creekx, wadin' boot and KerryS like this.
  17. Brady Burmeister Active Member

    Posts: 551
    OH
    Ratings: +132 / 0
    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1403492115.428323.jpg ImageUploadedByTapatalk1403492126.395700.jpg ImageUploadedByTapatalk1403492137.262091.jpg ImageUploadedByTapatalk1403492146.096919.jpg


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  18. KerryS Ignored Member

    Posts: 6,701
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    Ratings: +1,744 / 0
    Here is a shot recently done with the Tamron lens.

    [IMG]
    Brady Burmeister and creekx like this.
  19. creekx spent spinner

    Posts: 361
    Rancho Deluxe
    Ratings: +15 / 0
    Wow. Great work all! I find macro the most difficult of anything I attempt, mostly due to the challenges of extremely shallow DOF and handheld vibration. I have a 20 year old Tamron 90mm f/2.8 macro (same as yours Kerry?) Nikon mount that I shot with film and now on my DSLR's. I obviously need a lot more practice. Are you guys using flash on all of these to enable a quick shutter speed for hand-held? I'm always relying on daylight on the stream trying to photo mayflies, maybe that's POTP (part of the problem.)
  20. Brady Burmeister Active Member

    Posts: 551
    OH
    Ratings: +132 / 0
    Yes, always a flash, even in good daylight. Mostly because I get so close that I'm usually casting a shadow. Even if subject is in light I'll use flash for fill. But no shots are over 1/160 because my flash is just a manual non-high speed sync and Pentax limits the shutter when using non TTL non HSS flash.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk