Redington CT & Sage LL

Discussion in 'Fly Fishing Forum' started by Codioos, Dec 11, 2012.

  1. Codioos

    Codioos Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2012
    Messages:
    471
    Likes Received:
    101
    Location:
    Spokane
    I may take a lot of crap for this, but am I the only one that see's how close these rods are in appearance and feel... Just saying.
     
  2. Rob Ast

    Rob Ast Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,965
    Media:
    36
    Likes Received:
    261
    Location:
    West Pugetopolis WA
    Many have commented on it. I have not cast a LL, but most of the side-by-side reports actually indicate they are in fact quite distinct apart from being true medium action rods.
     
  3. rainbow

    rainbow My name is Mark Oberg

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,248
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Renton wa
    Home Page:
    Then there are going to be alot of people getting crap, ha ha. its a great rod for the price.
     
  4. freestoneangler

    freestoneangler Not to be confused with Freestone

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    4,626
    Media:
    24
    Likes Received:
    922
    Location:
    Edgewood, WA
    LL series...routinely emulated, but never equaled...just saying. The LL-389 is still the holy grail of small water quivers IMHO.

    That said, $79 for what is a very nice rod series, is a bargain.
     
  5. Old406Kid

    Old406Kid Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    92
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    And now you say this LL thing!
    I almost pulled the trigger on one of these when I saw them for 75$
    and finally talked myself out of it after looking at the pile of rods in my basement.
    I had a LL that I built blow out of my rod holder at Bailey a couple of years ago,
    still makes me sick. (Actually lost it twice in a week up there but that's another
    whole story) So please for sanity reasons tell me no comparison.
     
  6. Patrick Gould

    Patrick Gould Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    2,356
    Media:
    1
    Likes Received:
    685
    Location:
    Ellensburg, WA
    I have two CTs and they are nice, well built rods. They're a great buy even at full retail but the appearance and quality of the LL is well above.
     
  7. Josh

    Josh dead in the water

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,103
    Media:
    11
    Likes Received:
    593
    Location:
    NW Washington
    My CTs remind me somewhat of my 3wt 8'9 Sage VPS Lite. I wouldn't say they are exactly the same or anything, but I do find them similar in feel.

    But that's just me and I'm hardly a rod test expert.
     
  8. chief

    chief Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    395
    Likes Received:
    151
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    In a tight race with the 7'11" 4wt LL.....
     
  9. Porter

    Porter Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    6,593
    Likes Received:
    596
    Location:
    Kenmore, WA, USA.
    I have compared the 386-4 CT to the LL 389-4 and like Josh find them similar in feel. Now, please correct me if wrong, but there were three different series of the LL put out. Graphite II models, Graphite III models, and the classic 500 limited run GIII 389-4. I have the latter. I don't know if there is a difference or how much of a difference between these different models not to mention 2pc/3pc/4pc versions. So when some are comparing the CT to the LL which one are they comparing it to? ....I'm not sure how controlled the variables are in these comparisons. But the LL wins the eye candy award.
     
  10. Drifter

    Drifter Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,706
    Likes Received:
    720
    I fished both for a day - a LL 590 2 pc. (this model was known to have to soft of tip) and a 8'6" 3 wt. CT

    the difference in blanks is in the butt section of the LL that I found. the LL has a lot more "SPRING" - "RESERVE POWER" in the butt section of the rolled blank for the LL. when you start going long with an LL and start getting the butt section in the cast it speeds up Quite nicely with great feel - not stiff, a great feature for any rod.

    The CT is built in a classic progressive taper (which is nice) but does not get the help and speed from the butt section like the LL does!

    I don't know if it's a better graphite thing - or if the butt sections on the LL just had more graphite in the butt sections but that would be the difference if you were to ask me. And makes them a world apart in my opinion. The CT just did not have that reserve power or "spring" to help it when going long.
     
    Kent Lufkin likes this.
  11. Salmo_g

    Salmo_g Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2004
    Messages:
    7,922
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    2,012
    Location:
    Your City ,State
    I can't compare. My LL is a 5 wt, and CT is a 3 wt. Got them both at bargain prices and consider them both a good value for different reasons.

    Sg
     
  12. rainbow

    rainbow My name is Mark Oberg

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,248
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Renton wa
    Home Page:
    Think of it as a poor mans LL or vpsl. I mean its as close as your going to get for the money. Its not a LL or never will be, but what the hell
     
  13. Old406Kid

    Old406Kid Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2012
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    92
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    Thanks rainbow, I feel better now.
     
  14. Gary C. Brown

    Gary C. Brown Les Paul Lover

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    258
    Media:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Maple Valley, WA, USA.
    My vote is for the 4-711, my first Sage and probably my favorite small stream rod. Caught a lot of small cutties in the Cascades on that rod.
     
  15. Steve Saville

    Steve Saville Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,682
    Likes Received:
    410
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    I have had a 490 LL for about 25 years. I wouldn't part with it if someone doubled the price I paid for it ($225 on closeout). It has been and will always be my "go to" trout rod. I just hope someone takes good care of it when I'm gone.
     
  16. Kyle Smith

    Kyle Smith Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2005
    Messages:
    2,173
    Media:
    13
    Likes Received:
    367
    Location:
    Bozeman, MT
    I just couldn't bring myself to buy the CT 386. I knew it would just sit there in my closet while I was out with my LL 4711. I hope the $75 rods are going to good use.
     
  17. Kent Lufkin

    Kent Lufkin Remember when you could remember everything?

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    7,148
    Media:
    54
    Likes Received:
    1,227
    Location:
    Not sure
    If I had an LL in my closet I wouldn't have bought a CT either. But I don't so I did. It's a fine rod and well worth the $120 I paid for it (the 6-piece CTs are long gone and were never priced at $75, even when they were available.)

    K
     
  18. Kent Lufkin

    Kent Lufkin Remember when you could remember everything?

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    7,148
    Media:
    54
    Likes Received:
    1,227
    Location:
    Not sure
    It hardly seems fair to compare a 5wt 9 foot LL with a 3wt CT. Sorta like comparing a Dodge Ram 4x4 diesel with a Ford Ranger 4x2 V6. My strong suspicion is that even if you had compared the 5wt LL with a 3wt LL, they would still have seemed quite different.

    I have three 8'9" 5-piece Sage SPs in 3wt, 4wt and 5wt and the 3 and the 5wts couldn't be more different. I actually lawn cast my 389-5 SP side by side with my new 386 CT and even they were pretty dissimilar, despite being rated at the same line weight.

    As I mentioned in an earlier thread on CTs, a good friend who loaned me his 379 LL for a day last fall has offered to re-loan it for a side by side comparo with the 386 CT and the 389-5 SP. While I suspect the longer (and slower actioned) SP will be the odd rod out, I also suspect that the CT and the LL will still be pretty different.

    K
     
  19. Codioos

    Codioos Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2012
    Messages:
    471
    Likes Received:
    101
    Location:
    Spokane
    All this talk made me grab a new 8654. For $75 with traditional action its hard to say no. But if a 5wt LL comes across I will def pull the trigger.
     
  20. Thomas Mitchell

    Thomas Mitchell Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2008
    Messages:
    844
    Media:
    174
    Likes Received:
    196
    Location:
    Western, WA
    Home Page:
    I bought a CT386 for my 15yo son. I also bought a 486 to keep in the car and loan out to people I take fishing. It's a standing New Year's resolution for me to take out at least one person who has never flyfished before and help them catch their first trout. The CT is perfect for that stuff.

    Even given that I am lucky enough to own or have owned some of the best 3wts imaginable (Tom Morgan 386, Winston IM6 386, Burkheimer 389, Scott G 883, Hoffhines bamboo 380), I was very impressed with the quality of the CT386 & 486. It made the law of diminishing returns very apparent as I spent literally more than 20X on some of the other rods than I spent on the CTs. The Redington CTs are great rods for a fantastic price from a company that stands behind their products.

    The small CT gear & pawl reels were great too. Those aren't nearly as common which is too bad.
     
    Mark Mercer and Josh Smestad like this.

Share This Page