The view of a society ignorant of steelhead

Discussion in 'Steelhead' started by ChrisC, Jan 13, 2012.

  1. Yard Sale

    Yard Sale Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2008
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    424
    Location:
    The Hood
    This thread tells me more about the ignorance of PNW folks than it does about Californians. Do you think it would be any better in Texas? Kansas? New York?

    Not all of CA is in LA. SF is actually mid-california....

    Your stateism is highly offensive!
     
  2. Chris Bellows

    Chris Bellows Your Preferred WFF Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    Messages:
    1,965
    Media:
    13
    Likes Received:
    1,112
    Location:
    The Salt
  3. Ringlee

    Ringlee Doesn't care how you fish Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,858
    Media:
    162
    Likes Received:
    49
    Location:
    Somewhere you don't know about, WA
    Sadly, I agree 100%
     
  4. Evan Burck

    Evan Burck Fudge Dragon

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,612
    Media:
    61
    Likes Received:
    1,822
    Location:
    Duvall, wa
    Home Page:
    Here's a fact about the majority people in every state: People live in an artificial environment, where the natural landscape has been paved over and shelter built. Their food is artificially provided for them, where it magically appears on store shelves and restaurant menus. How it got there is none of their concern. Because of this, they neither know nor care how their ecosystem, or lack thereof, works. And until it bites them in the ass in a huge way, they never will.
     
  5. cuponoodle breakfast

    cuponoodle breakfast Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    1,766
    Likes Received:
    417
    Location:
    Arlington
    Yeah. CA is fucked up because of all the people moving there from Washington. That, and the rabid unicorns terrorizing the streets.
     
  6. Klickrolf

    Klickrolf Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2010
    Messages:
    758
    Likes Received:
    286
    Location:
    Klickitat, Washington
    please excuse me if I'm out of line. I think we could restore...some, if not most...of washington state steelhead with almost nothing!!!!!!! All we need are regs that criminalize harvest of wild fish in the commercial and tribal fisheries. That eliminates all gill nets in freshwater. There are no populations of steelhead or salmon that can sustain gillnetting of wild fish "IN FRESH WATER". Tribes have a right to 50% of harvestable fish...but wild fish should not be harvestable!!

    And California would be better off if they had more steelhead...but that's just my opinion.
     
  7. (BigDave)

    (BigDave) Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2011
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Fairwood
    It's not all about harvest, its more a question of habitat. Harvest is easy to fix, habitat is not.
     
  8. JS

    JS Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    886
    Media:
    32
    Likes Received:
    71
    Unfortunately, the title of this post is more acurately stated as; "The ignorant views of the majority of western society".
     
  9. norcal51

    norcal51 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2010
    Messages:
    321
    Media:
    73
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    coeur d alene, Id
    So glad im originally from NOR-CAL, damn so-calers and there unquenchable thirst for our water. I found it funny that some of the worst comments came from people who claimed to be sportsman. obviously they have never caught a steelhead. When cali falls into the ocean it will mostly be so cal that goes. the major fault thru the middle of the state shoots out into the ocean right by San Francisco, so my beloved nor-cal should stay intact.
     
  10. Ryan Higgins

    Ryan Higgins Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2011
    Messages:
    747
    Media:
    30
    Albums:
    3
    Likes Received:
    219
    Location:
    Central, WA
    Sad sad truth.
     
  11. cabezon

    cabezon Sculpin Enterprises

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,864
    Media:
    224
    Likes Received:
    407
    Location:
    Olympia, WA
    A few comments. While I understand that it was one of the responsibility of the report writers to put a price tag on correcting the incredible habitat destruction that has occurred in Southern California streams, any claim of what something will cost in 80 to 100 years needs to taken with a tremendous grain of salt. Imagine what a loaf of bread (or solyent green - the youngsters may need to Google that reference) will cost in 80 to 100 years.

    Second, we already know how expensive restoring habitat / access for salmonids can be locally. The BPA issues estimates of the "costs" of their efforts to mitigate their Columbia river dams, on the scale of $320 million / year (see http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19941208&slug=1946009). Some are true costs (e.g., barging fish, supporting hatcheries, harassing/relocating predators) and some are "costs" in the form of foregone opportunities to generate power when they spill water over the dams, rather than through turbines, to assist with outmigration of smolts. One can make a cogent argument that these foregone opportunities are not really costs, but BPA does and includes these in their propaganda.

    Third, many of the problems facing salmonid recovery in southern California is the myriad small blockages created by small dams that lack salmon ladders and roads that lack proper culverts. The #1 priorities were water storage and vehicle access and no consideration was given to what rivers do and what lives in them. You can make the argument that the $1-2 billion price tag is the cost of previous bad designs. But, we have our own problems with access. Restoration efforts like the removal of the Elwha dams are a great step in the right direction. But, Washington state is already in technical violation of a court order in a case brought by the tribes for inadequate stream passage. While progress is occurring, the backlog of just culvert work is huge.

    Steve
     
  12. Jeremy Floyd

    Jeremy Floyd fly fishing my way through life

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2006
    Messages:
    2,637
    Media:
    178
    Likes Received:
    396
    Location:
    Quesnel, BC
    It does not take a rocket surgeon to realize that if we cannot stop the demise of the lives of the animals in the food chains around us, at some point we will be helpless to stop out own demise. The earth will still be here. We just wont be, if things continue.
     
  13. robspe7370

    robspe7370 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Poquoson, VA
    Well instead of fighting a hatchery culture,sovereign native American interests, and and the commercial fishing industry for native restoration, they will be fighting the water rights consortiums of Southern California. So we can expect progress to be just as painful as in the Northwest.Peachy!
     
  14. Abomb

    Abomb Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    33
    Location:
    In the skinny
    No, but it will take a brain scientist.
     
  15. gldntrt40

    gldntrt40 Gone Fishing

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    585
    Media:
    7
    Likes Received:
    197
    Location:
    UFO over the city
    the animals on earth when man arrived here didn't like us either I bet..I wonder how humans made it before we could defend ourselves?
    Easy to point to intelligence as our survival skill or was it we just tasted bad like stinky caterpillars to birds? : )
     
  16. gldntrt40

    gldntrt40 Gone Fishing

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    585
    Media:
    7
    Likes Received:
    197
    Location:
    UFO over the city
    Maybe we could revamp the WPPSS Satsop Nuclear division team to take over fish restoration. They build real pretty 600 foot tall flower pots.....
     
  17. doublespey

    doublespey Steelhead-a-holic

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2003
    Messages:
    641
    Likes Received:
    51
    Location:
    Bothell, WA
    Anyone watch "Rivers of a Lost Coast"? If not, you can watch the trailer here:

    http://www.riversofalostcoast.com/

    Just because this tool doesn't realize what Californians lost (or its value) doesn't change history.

    Wait 10 -20 years and the same will likely be said of WA and OR.

    Cheers,

    Brian
     
  18. Jim Welch

    Jim Welch Veni, Vidi, Fishi OFFC

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2008
    Messages:
    83
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    Renton, WA
    So, I am curious, is there such a thing as a "too much money" threshold for habitat and specie restoration? Or should we adopt a policy of "whatever it takes"? Where does the line get drawn?
     
  19. dryflylarry

    dryflylarry "Chasing Riseforms"

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    4,143
    Media:
    203
    Likes Received:
    624
    Location:
    Near the Fjord
    I'm all for habitat restoration, but, it costs big bucks, usually. That's where volunteers help a lot to keep costs down. I think a bigger priority is "habitat protection" first. Streams and wetlands are still being screwed with today by various developers. Just look around at the developments and bulldozers in your neighborhood. That's why it's important to stay ontop of what's going on in your own community and take part in going to the public hearings with your county commissioners, etc. Ever go to a public hearing with your other fly club members to protest a buffer being violated along your favorite stream that provides steelhead or cutthroat habitat? Heck no.....
     
  20. Citori

    Citori Piscatorial Engineer

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,224
    Likes Received:
    143
    Location:
    Auburn, WA
    Random factoid. It costs WDFW about $200-$250 per hatchery steelhead caught to produce them, but that same hatchery steelhead caught by a recreational fisherman returns about $750 to the local economy. WDFW's numbers. Not saying hatcheries are the answer by any means, just illustrating another way to look at the "cost" issue. Turns out those steelhead and salmon are a pretty important part of this state's economy.

    If you really want your stomach to turn, take a look at what this state's commercial fisheries return in direct revenues to the state, and the net economic value they contribute to the state economy. Some commercial fisheries in total are worth less than what the taxpayers pay to produce the fish for them to catch.

    Another interesting factoid. After all the billions (that's right, with a "b") spent on habitat restoration in WA, there is not one river in WA that has had its escapement goal increased to take advantage of the "restored" habitat.
     

Share This Page