Would you stop fishing? (Steelhead)

Discussion in 'Steelhead' started by Panhandle, Feb 6, 2008.

  1. Panhandle

    Panhandle Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    4,103
    Media:
    50
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    Selkirk Mountains, Idaho Panhandle
    Hypothetical question here with certain intent:

    If saving native steelhead meant closing down all river systems for 20 years, would you be willing to make that sacrifice? Look at it in terms of no steelhead fishing what so ever, not even for brats.

    I ask this, because we often talk about making sacrifices for the better good, but we're also human, as well as selfish steelhead junkies. I would be interested in getting honest answers. It would be a very tough one for me. I support hatchery programs because of my selfishness, but also know that this selfishness is detrimental to native fish health. So.....
     
  2. fatguide

    fatguide fish or DIE

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Corvallis, Montana
    Pan;

    I feel like you just punched me in the stones, I'm going to have to think about this one.

    Great soul-searching question Adam.
     
  3. LD

    LD Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    1,084
    Media:
    10
    Likes Received:
    93
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    Yes with a few if's,
    - stop gill netting
    - have the government team up with some outside interests to make sure things are going the right direction.
    - better enforcement, I so not want to stop so poachers have more fish.

    Also do not think that it would take 20 yrs if the got with the program.
     
  4. Tyler Sadowski

    Tyler Sadowski Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    489
    Media:
    29
    Likes Received:
    30
    Location:
    Kirkland, wa
    i would stop fishing. it would suck but if it meant that one day i could fish for a healthy run of natives or if my kids could fish for them it would be all worth it. hopefully it never comes to that but somethings got to be done.
     
  5. chadk

    chadk Be the guide...

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,057
    Media:
    516
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    Snohomish, WA.
    In a heart beat. But then I'm only in my mid 30s so I should be around to see the opening and I'd be happy to wait.

    Some assumptions:
    * salmon, trout, and other fishing wouldn't be directly impacted
    * this is part a multi-faceted aproach that includes: working with the tribes on netting, closing down the sale and export of all wild steelhead from WA, habitat focus, fish passage issues, no hatchery steelhead unless part of rebuilding wild fish brood stock program.
     
  6. Steven Hendrickson

    Steven Hendrickson Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2007
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    bellingham washington
    Yes but I dont think 20 years would be the right amount of time maybe 3-5 years. Thats just my uneducated opinion.
     
  7. PT

    PT Physhicist

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,644
    Likes Received:
    781
    Location:
    Edmonds, WA
    No. I'd move.
     
  8. Ryan Nathe

    Ryan Nathe Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Media:
    64
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I would stop fishing for them if it mean't that natives recovered.
     
  9. rick matney

    rick matney Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,301
    Media:
    197
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Bozeman, Montana
    No. but I could cut back if the powers at be would support my saltwater addiction. Just saying i'm selfish and we have already fubared it up so bad already 20 years wouldn't do it in my opinion.
     
  10. PETI

    PETI Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2002
    Messages:
    218
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Battle Ground, WA
    Did it on the East Coast for stripers with good results, would here also. The beauty with rivers is you could shut half down and fish the other half filled with brats.
    My bet is the me/mines would nix it and rather fish them to extinction.

    Peter
     
  11. SeaRun Fanatic

    SeaRun Fanatic Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2005
    Messages:
    419
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    Northwest, WA
    Would said rivers be closed to ALL FISHING during this period? Seems like the only way to reach the desired goal without waaaaay to much wiggle room. And is there data to say that taking such action would be significantly more effective than a 100% C&R ruling for the rivers in question?
     
  12. Freestone

    Freestone Not to be confused with freestoneangler

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,552
    Media:
    15
    Likes Received:
    1,458
    Location:
    .
    Yes, for as long as it would take if it contributed to rebuilding healthy, self-sustaining populations. Sure, there are plenty of other things that also need to be done but if this is how I could help save even a few fish, I'd do it in a heartbeat. The fact that other user groups need to make changes too doesn’t mean I have to wait for them to do their part before I do mine.
     
  13. Tim Cottage

    Tim Cottage Formerly tbc1415

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    1,724
    Likes Received:
    276
    Location:
    Outer Duvall
    Yes. I have already done just that. I was an avid steelheader longer than many of this boards members have been fishing let alone flyfishing. I could no longer justify contributing to the decline of native fish just because it gives me pleasure to catch them.
    I was not going to wait until so and so did such and such. The buck stops here not over there.

    TC
     
  14. Sageman

    Sageman Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Yakima, WA
    I'd hate to see it close down for that length of time. I've always wondered about a rotating system where you divide the steelhead rivers up into 3 groups and then rotate them on a 3 year schedule. Open for 3, closed for 3, etc. Problem is that it would drastically increase the pressure on the ones that were open.

    I also would not at all hesitate to agree to buy a $200 (or more) enhancement endorsement, assuming the money actually went to enhancement. Heck, I'd pay $1000 if it would improve the fishing.
     
  15. TomB

    TomB Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,631
    Likes Received:
    67
    Location:
    seattle,wa
    Yes. I would then direct all of the time I would have spent fishing over the next 20 years toward raising hell with managers, comanagers, and the feds to ensure that other harmful practices were stopped.
     
  16. Freestone

    Freestone Not to be confused with freestoneangler

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    Messages:
    2,552
    Media:
    15
    Likes Received:
    1,458
    Location:
    .
    Tim, I made that decision too. It’s pretty hard to maintain the illusion that C&R is ok when you hook an endangered steelhead deep and it bleeds to death in your hands and it's all you can do not to puke or cry in front of your friends. Really puts things in perspective fast and puts you off ever wanting to risk contributing to their extinction again...
     
  17. mike doughty

    mike doughty Honorary Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Messages:
    10,204
    Media:
    2,199
    Likes Received:
    13
    Location:
    the uinta's
    Home Page:
    even if i fished for them onn a regular basis, absolutely. there are other species to fish for
     
  18. WaFlyCaster

    WaFlyCaster Tricoptera

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2004
    Messages:
    464
    Media:
    79
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Fife, WA
    Yes.. I have the same feeling. Also would want all the money that went to hatchery steelhead put towards improving habitat... removing passage barriers... dams.. etc. as well as eliminating potention pollution sources... and stopping the crazy developement of businesses and housing developements that are WAYYY too close to rivers.
     
  19. HauntedByWaters

    HauntedByWaters Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    2,791
    Likes Received:
    145
    Location:
    Bellingham
    I feel you man, this has never happened to me but it would really mess me up.

    However, isn't it crazy that you felt that way about your mortally wounded fish and yet there are nets in the river fishing for them...and that you can order them and eat them at a restaurant in Seattle.....Doesn't that make you 100X as messed up?

    Like I say it has never happened to me but the things mentioned above mess me up BIG TIME.

    I changed my opinion from yesterday, I would happily give up fishing for steelhead under the right circumstances (some of the ones mentioned above)....but those circumstances will NEVER occur.
     
  20. Steelie Mike

    Steelie Mike Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,607
    Media:
    190
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    Camas, WA
    Home Page:
    Yes, but I think I would have a hard time fishing for carp with all of my spey rods and gear.
     

Share This Page