Yet another set of assaults on the WDFW Commission

Discussion in 'Fly Fishing Forum' started by Citori, Feb 5, 2011.

  1. generic

    generic Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,893
    Likes Received:
    562
    I'm curious, what is the actual catch limit for those nets I see down on the Columbia river near The Dalles? Are they individually owned? Meaning, that one net per native? How many can they net in a day, year...whatever?
     
  2. Bill on the bay

    Bill on the bay New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Union,Wa
    Most Tribal nets are individually owned. Most fishers would be allowed to fish one gear type meaning I cannot fish a beach seine while having a gill or drift net employed. I would not venture to say what the Tribe's or commercials would or could catch in a day on the Columbia R.
     
  3. Citori

    Citori Piscatorial Engineer

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,222
    Likes Received:
    138
    Location:
    Auburn, WA
    I am somewhat amazed at the philosophical discussions that seem to suggest it isn't a good idea to act on your conscience. I would offer one additional bit of information. The tribes and commercial fishers want the commission gone, and are actively lobbying for these bills. Need I say more?
     
  4. generic

    generic Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,893
    Likes Received:
    562
    Wow, big surprise.....not! :beathead:
     
  5. Leopardbow

    Leopardbow Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    483
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Ferndale, WA
    Well, Senator Ranker's term expires in 2012. Something to be noted by those recreational fishing and hunting voters who I assume vastly outweight the nubmers of commercial folks.

    While not exactly in his district, I know him well, unfortunately.
     
  6. gt

    gt Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,616
    Media:
    19
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    sequim, WA
    wow, just back how to find one of the funniest posts salmo g has ever put up, Marx????? hahahahahahahaha

    and then we have a person who is witness to abuse and the status quo folks here are unwilling to accept what he sees and experiences.

    totally amazing that human nature has allowed us to survive for so long.
     
  7. Ed Call

    Ed Call Mumbling Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Messages:
    17,893
    Media:
    283
    Likes Received:
    1,711
    Location:
    Kitsap Peninsula
    Sonofa....

    So if the public put the Commission into place in 1996 (sorry, predates my transplating here) and it is being lobbied against by Commercial and Tribal fisheries, does that mean that the Commission is having some beneficial impact to fisheries? I realize there is no magic wand to fix these man made problems of habitat destruction and over fishing. Barring that magic wand, does it not make sense that a Commission of individuals would be a better option than a single person focused on government interest and profit taking? It seems that neither government interest or profit taking align well with long term fish run sustainability. I'd like to learn more, and will seek more education from other sources because it is of interest to me. I'm not really interested in the pissing in each other's wheaties contest.
     
  8. Ed Call

    Ed Call Mumbling Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Messages:
    17,893
    Media:
    283
    Likes Received:
    1,711
    Location:
    Kitsap Peninsula
    From WDFW web site regarding the Commission (which has one WW and EW positions currently vacant):

    Fish and Wildlife Commission

    The Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission consists of nine members serving six-year terms. Members are appointed by the governor and confirmed by the senate. Three members must reside east of the summit of the Cascade mountains, three must reside west of the summit, and three may reside anywhere in the state. No two Commissioners may reside in the same county.

    While the Commission has several responsibilities, its primary role is to establish policy and direction for fish and wildlife species and their habitats in Washington and to monitor the Department's implementation of the goals, policies and objectives established by the Commission. The Commission also classifies wildlife and establishes the basic rules and regulations governing the time, place, manner, and methods used to harvest or enjoy fish and wildlife.

    The Commission receives its authority from the passage of Referendum 45 by the 1995 Legislature and public at the 1995 general election. The Commission is the supervising authority for the Department. With the 1994 merger of the former Departments of Fisheries and Wildlife, the Commission has comprehensive species authority as well.

    Through formal public meetings and informal hearings held around the state, the Commission provides an opportunity for citizens to actively participate in management of Washington's fish and wildlife.
     
  9. smc

    smc Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    389
    Media:
    4
    Likes Received:
    47
    Location:
    Up River
    I figure SG meant Groucho and that GT thinks Karl. :clown:
     
  10. gt

    gt Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,616
    Media:
    19
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    sequim, WA
    and here i was just about to scan my birth certificate :)
     
  11. Ed Call

    Ed Call Mumbling Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Messages:
    17,893
    Media:
    283
    Likes Received:
    1,711
    Location:
    Kitsap Peninsula
    To submit with your Commission application to the Governor's office?
     
  12. gt

    gt Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,616
    Media:
    19
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    sequim, WA
    kind of went along with the 'socialist' card..............
     
  13. Go Fish

    Go Fish Language, its a virus

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,314
    Media:
    32
    Likes Received:
    127
    Location:
    Rheomode, Wa.
    I think this thread should be attached
    to the one about who is going to
    catch the last steelhead on S-river.

    It is plain that politics, combined with
    fish and game management, is like letting
    my drunkard Uncle Ernie run a Washington
    State Liquor store.

    The State and the Tribes have done a
    piss-poor job of managing the resource.

    With less monies for enforcement, and the
    untouchables (the Tribes), it seems that
    the best hope is.......

    a five to ten year ban
    on all nets in Puget Sound.

    Dave
     
  14. Salmo_g

    Salmo_g Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2004
    Messages:
    8,033
    Media:
    6
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Location:
    Your City ,State
    Go Fish,

    Why do you say that? There is no credible evidence that nets are limiting the populations of Puget Sound steelhead. The only such evidence is your and gt's visceral hearsay knowledge that the nets are responsible for the depressed size of PS steelhead populations. This is not to say that I recommend having your drunkard Uncle Ernie run a liquor store.

    Sg
     
  15. gt

    gt Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,616
    Media:
    19
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    sequim, WA
  16. Go Fish

    Go Fish Language, its a virus

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,314
    Media:
    32
    Likes Received:
    127
    Location:
    Rheomode, Wa.
    Salmo,
    I guess your stance is that the
    nets in Puget Sound are helping the
    Salmon, Steelhead, and other populations
    of other fish in Puget Sound.

    I didn't know that.

    Dave
     
  17. generic

    generic Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,893
    Likes Received:
    562
    gt, I'd bet $100 to your $1 that it goes nowhere. It will get a lot of attention, but in the end it will end up just fading away. Hell, if they can essentially throw out I-1053 30+ days after it became law and stop on us peasants, what makes anyone think this is actually going to get done.
     
  18. cabezon

    cabezon Sculpin Enterprises

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2004
    Messages:
    1,814
    Media:
    224
    Likes Received:
    320
    Location:
    Olympia, WA
    I'm not a lawyer; I've never stayed in a Holiday Inn Express. But I am a pretty aware individual and I don't see the relevance of a lawsuit at the STATE level impacting tribal FEDERAL fishing activities. Maybe you can enlighten the class??

    Steve
     
  19. Go Fish

    Go Fish Language, its a virus

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,314
    Media:
    32
    Likes Received:
    127
    Location:
    Rheomode, Wa.
    I've stayed in those rat holes,
    and there is no enlightenment
    without suffering.

    dK
     
  20. Ed Call

    Ed Call Mumbling Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Messages:
    17,893
    Media:
    283
    Likes Received:
    1,711
    Location:
    Kitsap Peninsula
    What would be the problem with all netting inland and inshore waters being banned?
     

Share This Page