NFR A Guardian Teacher Law

Discussion in 'Fly Fishing Forum' started by Brad Soliday, Dec 18, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brad Soliday

    Brad Soliday New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    15
    Please forgive me for posting a non-fishing thread, but the recent violence in Conn. has weighed heavily on my heart. I'm a teacher of 18 years and an avid fly fisherman... The members of this board represent a broad political spectrum and i wanted to bounce the following legislative idea off all of you as i believe it can relatively quickly make our schools safer (if passed). thank you

    brad


    Individual local school boards in Washington State should be allowed to issue “Guardian Teacher Permits.” The Guardian Teacher Permit would be a concealed weapons permit + 1. The Guardian Teacher or Administrator would be allowed to carry a concealed weapon onto school grounds during their work day. The following is a basic outline of what might be included in said legislation:

    1. Guardian Teachers or Administrators would be selected and approved by local school districts (built in vetting process that costs the state nothing).

    2. Participation in this program would be completely optional. No school district would have to participate.

    3. Guardian Teacher applications could be submitted to the state for additional background checks (which teachers have already passed).

    4. Only teachers with impeccable employee record would be eligible. Guardian Status could be revoked at any time by the school board under their discretion.

    5. Automatic suspension of Guardian status for any of the following: DWI, or violations of the law above or beyond a speeding ticket, and for receiving an employee reprimand.

    6. Guardian teachers would be required to attend some type of training (two to four days, at employee or district cost), covering their role and responsibility as a Guardian teacher, gun safety, and pass a basic marksmanship course.

    7. Guardian teachers would be under direction to keep an absolutely low profile (we don’t talk about guardian teachers….” If you have questions ask the district office.”

    8. Only teachers/administrators with a proven record of service and professionalism would be eligible.

    Rational:

    1. Our schools have proven the most vulnerable targets in our society for the violence of demented minds. As a society we have no more precious treasure than our children, yet we guard armored trucks better than our schools.

    2. The cost of having full time protection from police officers or trained and armed security guards is more than most districts can afford.

    3. Regardless of anyone’s position on gun control legislation or the passage of future gun control laws, it is likely that these acts of insanity will plague our society well into the future. A Guardian Teacher law could make our schools safer in a matter of weeks (if passed).

    4. The mere knowledge that Guardian Teachers are present in a school may dissuade potential attacks.

    5. There seems to be an ever increasing number of disturbed people who view our children as targets. As there are wolves in our world, let us put Guardians among the lambs.
     
  2. Steve Saville

    Steve Saville Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,244
    Likes Received:
    797
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    The reason children are targets is because they are the most vulnerable citizens we have and for the most part are unable to fight back. i am/was a teacher for 26 years. I can't see this happening in any school district a s it goes against the fundemental teaching that we involve ourselves in. I don't want anyone carrying a gun around in my school building where there could be an accident. That solves nothing. I'm not anti-gun nor do I want to give mine up but putting guns in schools solves nothing, in my opinion.
     
    stilly stalker and jwg like this.
  3. Lugan

    Lugan Joe Streamer

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,276
    Likes Received:
    3,708
    Location:
    Beautiful View, WA
    I've been thinking a lot about this solution (or something like it) even before this CT massacre. I'm on the PTSA Board at my kids' elementary school. I am at the school once a week at least to tutor kids. From the first day of school two years ago when my oldest started there, I was immediately struck by how open the access to the school is. It remains so today. The school district's website posted a special bulletin after the CT massacre touting its security measures. I read that and thought it was more of an open advertisement for a lunatic to come to one of our schools. There is simply no deterrence of any significance. Then I look at the few times a school shooter was stopped in his tracks by an armed staff member. Wasn't there such an incident in a high school in AL or MS a decade or so ago? Makes me wonder if that is the answer.

    On the other hand, I'm worried about asking staff to pack weapons. I know my school's staff well. They are excellent teachers and administrators. I don't see many of them being able to handle a firefight like a cop. Maybe I am wrong, but in my estimation, only two or three of the male staff could do it. Maybe that's enough; maybe not. I also worry about the unintended consequences, as Steve points out.

    Maybe there is a third solution: Post a cop at every school (in addition to other security measures like hardening entrances to buildings and classrooms). Many high schools already have armed police full time. Maybe that needs to trickle down to elementary schools. It would be expensive, but as gun rights advocates are fond of saying, "freedom isn't free". Maybe our kids' freedom to learn in peace is worth the financial cost.
     
    Robert Engleheart and dflett68 like this.
  4. Be Jofus G

    Be Jofus G Banned or Parked

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,051
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Washington
    Please do not give teachers guns. Teachers snap all the time. It's a very stressfull and thankless job. there are many recently unemployed men who have literally sent hundreds of thousands of rounds downrange. They are also already trained for urban combat. I'm sure some would appreciate the job. For a teacher It would be like working 2 full time jobs to train to be ready for a situation that would require an armed response. It's best that teachers concentrate on making kids smarter and let the pros do what they do.
     
    Jamie Wilson and dryflylarry like this.
  5. GAT

    GAT Dumbfounded

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    9,062
    Likes Received:
    7,604
    Location:
    Willamette Valley, OR
    I lean toward Lugan's plan.
     
  6. Patrick Gould

    Patrick Gould Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    692
    Location:
    Ellensburg, WA
    Sensible
     
  7. Grayone

    Grayone Fishin' to the end, Oc.P

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,534
    Likes Received:
    250
    Location:
    boring, oregon
  8. stilly stalker

    stilly stalker Tuna sniffer

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,863
    Likes Received:
    475
    Location:
    Carlsbad, CA
    Where I went to school when I was young, there were cops there every day, and guns found every week in kids lockers. In 6th grade.
    Guardian teacher... no way. Not anywhere Id send my kids to school. Id rather have a cop on duty at the school.
     
  9. Dave Alberts

    Dave Alberts Active Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    99
    Likes Received:
    47
    Location:
    Lakewood, WA
    As the spouse of a dedicated teacher for more than forty years, a life long shooting sports entheusiast, a father and a grandfather, and a former Marine, I too have strong feelings about school safety in particular, and societial safety in general. The NewTown tragedy has left us all numb, and truly heart broken. But what do we do to prevent such sensless acts in the future...

    First, I commend Brad for thinking "outside the box" and clearly putting his plan to print. I believe this approach, or something similar could work, but probably would not get past the prejudices and high emotion that Steve has referenced. Guns are not the problem, nor are guns alone the solution to our security issues.

    Instead of arming selected teachers with firearms that make loud noises, how about non-lethal devices such as stun guns, tasers, or something as novel as "bear spray"--the real stuff, not the "bad dog variety"... Most teachers I have known are non-violent and non-confrontational by nature, and would find it at least difficult to pull the trigger of a firearm, regardless of the danger to themselves or others, but could most likely be trained and desensitized to be able to use a non-lethal device effectively. One could also make a compelling case for their "non-lethal" nature in the event of an accident or "colateral injury".

    Or, how about we put our school "mascots" to work...every school has a mascot--an owl, a cougar, a bear, and possibly a school house cat... How about we have school house dogs...big ones, well trained, and with big teeth! We see all of the specialty gear carried by special ops wardogs these days, why not use them in schools and other vulnerable places too? We all know that there is nothing short of mothers, maybe, that is more protective of kids than the family dog. Train them, give them free range of the school and grounds with their camera packs and microphones sending back to the office monitor...not many bad guys would challenge them.

    To fix these problems in our society though, we must all be truly commited to solutions, rather than just pandering to a special interest group, or political party. Is that possible in today's world??
     
    bitterroot and Lugan like this.
  10. Brad Soliday

    Brad Soliday New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    15
    In regards to the concerns expressed so far.
    I've taught for 18 years, and have not "snapped" yet. Very few teachers "snap." Probably fewer than police who snap. The plan above is not a solution... NO ONE has a solution... its just mitigation. Armed security or police in every school is finacially impractical. A few armed teachers cost next to nothing. I work in a small school district but can count several teachers and administrators that would be comfortable and trusted to carry a weapon. I'm only asking for selected willing teachers... vetted by years of experience and proven professionalism. They would not be a substitute for police... they don't need to be trained to the level of a police officer, they likely would never use the weapon.... they would be there to give children seconds to escape, or hopefully stop a shooter. As far as accidents... ask a police officer how many times his gun accidently goes off during his career... school shottings probably happen more often in our society. additional safety proticol could be established to reduce the likelyhood of "accidents" (no round in the chamber).
    I am haunted by the pictures of those children... i want my kids to be protected, i want to protect the kids in my classroom with something other than a stapler. There are thousands of competent, stable, trusted teachers who could be more than just bullet stoppers in our schools. Let them be a guardian.
     
    Ed Call, speyfisher and Lugan like this.
  11. kjsteelhead

    kjsteelhead Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    164
    Likes Received:
    25
    Location:
    Bellingham, Washington
    Brad, I had similar thoughts on Friday. If I had a gun and that S.O.B. came into our school...

    But I think the bastard picked an elementary school because he new no one would fight back. Do you really think primary teachers would be packing if they were allowed to?

    Also, as a teacher going through the chaotic halls of a middle school, you spend a great deal of time greeting and talking to the kids. I'd hate to be walking the halls thinking about making sure one of the less-stable kids doesn't try to grab my sidearm and do something stupid with it.

    I like the idea of school resource officers in all schools that would have a social-worker type role that backs up our already-overloaded school counselors. Bring back the DARE programs, add other similar programs, and split the cost between district and local police.

    The first thing I'd like to see, however, is for all of you whose kids have violent video games at home, get rid of the damn games! What are they teaching? Also, don't have you or your kids watch all of the crime and murder and violent crap that we have on T.V. You are you kids' primary role model. The kids are being constantly bombarded with the message of, "If you get mad, solve it with violence."
     
  12. speyfisher

    speyfisher Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,339
    Likes Received:
    364
    Location:
    State of Jefferson U.S.A.
    We hear this same old sh!t every time something like this happens. "reasonable gun controls" "compromise" (liberal speak for capitulate) yada, ,yada, yada. WTF have you ******* liberals compromised? Most of you are so paranoid about guns, yet you have no idea what you are talking about. To hear you tell it, you would think a gun would go off just by looking at it. You go into a bank that has armed guards and think nothing of it. Do you think those armed guards are are trained police? They are private contractors. Bitch & moan about a couple of administrators being armed, but it's OK to make your kids cower in a corner watching their friends get shot up until the police get there.

    Yet it's OK for your kids to be bombarded every day with violent video games. I see nothing good in a game where the object is to kill as many people as you can within a given period of time. Even if they are supposed to be bad guys. Screw it. Ban and confiscate them all! Oh, we can't restrict content you say. That would violate some game manufacturers first amendment rights. Too f***in bad. Is their first amendment right to pollute your kid's mind with such crap more important than someone trying to protect your kid with a gun?

    And while we're addressing the subject of first amendment rights, how about some restrictions on the media? Like quit sensationalizing these acts of violence. One paragraph on page four with no mention of the shooters name. Or one small mention of the crime on the moving strip at the bottom of the screen. Why should the shooter get any fame or glory for committing these heinous crimes? Why should the media be allowed to capitalize on it either? Screw them too! Leave these victims and their survivors alone, to heal in peace.....My side has made enough concessions. It's your turn.
     
    Don Freeman likes this.
  13. mtskibum16

    mtskibum16 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,589
    Likes Received:
    797
    Location:
    Puget Sound Beaches
    I think the price of more police patrolling the schools would be money well spent. If not an officer at every school, then perhaps a patrol that covers a couple schools randomly throughout the day. Hell even a police vehicle parked at each school (with the random patrol) would be a start. I know I've been fooled on the highway before by an empty police cruiser parked on the side of the road. It seems a shooter would think twice about walking past a police car while entering a school.
     
    Lugan likes this.
  14. Steve Saville

    Steve Saville Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    3,244
    Likes Received:
    797
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    I retired as a full time teacher in June but I'm back in school as a substitute regularly. I'm at school today and there was a Des Moines Police Officer in our building this morning. I asked if he was here because of the Newtown incident and he told me that yes he was here to make the children more comfortable and to let the community know that the police are present and aware of what's going on. He won't be here full time but is near if needed. That's a much better solution and the kids are much more at ease today after seeing him here. Two thumbs up for the DPD.
     
    triploidjunkie likes this.
  15. Jason Rolfe

    Jason Rolfe Wanderer

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,203
    Likes Received:
    405
    Location:
    the beach
    So let me get this straight:

    You get pissed off when someone suggests that people take another look at gun control because one crazy person massacred a bunch of kids. You're basically saying, all the rest of us law-abiding citizens shouldn't be punished for the mistakes of one or a few.

    BUT, it's okay to completely ban video games--something that millions enjoy responsibly--because of the actions of one person, or a few.

    So as long as it's something you love and understand (guns), you think no one should touch it. But if it is something you disapprove of and don't understand (video games) you think it should be okay to completely ban it.

    Great logic there. And for the record, I don't own a gun, but I also don't think banning guns is the solution. I do play video games occasionally, though I'm not an avid gamer.

    Jason
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.