A Sign of Good Fishing

Discussion in 'Saltwater' started by miyawaki, Oct 31, 2012.

  1. sashjo

    sashjo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2003
    Messages:
    541
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Lakewood, WA.
    The sign means: The five figure property taxes that I pay do not provide for the collection and removal of public trash from my private property. The sign tells me nothing about the fishing.
     
  2. Bradley Miller

    Bradley Miller Dances with fish

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2012
    Messages:
    476
    Likes Received:
    133
    Location:
    Tacoma
    Thats not the issue at hand. Do you or do you not retain the access rights to the tidelands below mean high tide? If not, then your taxes aren't the issue. Right?
     
  3. Rich Schager

    Rich Schager You should have been here yesterday...

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Harstine Island
    AMEN !
     
  4. Rich Schager

    Rich Schager You should have been here yesterday...

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    18
    Location:
    Harstine Island
    Most, if not all, counties in Washington have online search fuctions / property maps for each parcel of land - I've used these extensively. You can even see the amount of high property taxes being paid by the waterfront owner that you want to trespass on for free!
     
  5. Salmo_g

    Salmo_g Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2004
    Messages:
    8,729
    Likes Received:
    3,110
    Location:
    Your City ,State
    Owning waterfront is not the same as owning the tidelands, and that seems to be the focus of this thread. WA state did sell off a large amount of Puget Sound tidelands, but for the casual beach walker and angler, it's not even close to easy to discern which tidelands are private property and which are not. Many a waterfront owner mistakenly or purposely claims ownership of the tidelands that they do not have title to. I think that is the issue Bradley is trying to address. A similar thing happens sometimes on rivers. I ask the property owner to please call the Sheriff's office. Unfortunately the vast majority of County deputies are uninformed about riparian rights, but at least the lag time buys time enough for me to fish and move on.

    Sg
     
  6. sashjo

    sashjo Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2003
    Messages:
    541
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Lakewood, WA.
    Riparian/littoral law in WA State is very complex. It is clear that some here do not respect the rights of waterfront property owners. The attitude that "asking for forgiveness is better than asking for permission", is wrong and may land your butt in jail one day. I don't believe that I am being unreasonable when I expect better of fellow fisherman.
     
    daveypetey likes this.
  7. Wayne Chan

    Wayne Chan Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    .
    I believe in respecting private property. I also believe in respecting public access rights. The similar thing on rivers that Sg talks about particularly gets my goat when somebody asks me to pay a fee to "trespass" on property they don't own. Would you whip out the technology right then and there? This day and age, it is not difficult to access information.
     
    daveypetey likes this.
  8. Pat Lat

    Pat Lat Mad Flyentist

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2012
    Messages:
    1,282
    Likes Received:
    1,126
    Location:
    seattle-ish
    it is also clear that some do not respect the rights of the public to have access to tidelands that the government didnt have the right to "sell" in the first. According to the public trust doctrine which has roots dating back to the romans, the intertidal space from the mean high water mark to extreme low tide are to be held, in trust by the government for the use of the public. This means that neither the government nor the person owning adjacent property should be able to claim exclusive rights to the property.
    http://www.slc.ca.gov/policy_statements/public_trust/public_trust_doctrine.pdf

    Being a fisherman I would expect you to understand why we may cross "boundaries", sometimes seeing the rezzies or cutts jumping 100ft past those signs is too tempting, but it sounds like you might be the kindof person to chase off someone who is just trying to have a good time fishing. In which case fine have the beach to your self.

    Yes you should be respectful. yes you should pack out your garbage and leader trimmings or other trash you may come across, but not just because its someones property, because the beings that truely own and inhabit the property aren't able to do it themselves.

    By the way its not trespassing if im in a kayak floating inches above your "property", whats is the real difference between that and wading. lets say I caught my fly on my back cast in a bush on your property, would you prefer I break it off as opposed to getting out of the kayak and untangling it? either I'm littering or I'm tresspassing. Personally i don't give two shits about trespassing, you dont own the beach no matter what some piece of paper says.
     
    Jim Wallace and dryflylarry like this.
  9. jeff bandy

    jeff bandy Make my day

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    2,860
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Location:
    Edmonds, Wa.
    Pat, although I agree with you in principle. I have to side with the landowners on this one. Whether it was right or wrong of the state to sell the tidelands is a mute point. They did and the owners pay high taxes on them.
    I am willing to bet those who think it's okay to trespass don't own land and pay taxes on that land. If they did, they would be thinking twice about ignoring someone else's rights. How would you like it if you woke up one morning and found someone in your backyard?
    The argument that "it wasn't right to sell the land to them so it's okay for me to ignore the sign" is just as lame as saying "It ain't illegal tell you get caught".
    Personally I think the state should have to buy all of the tidelands back.
    One more thing. That public trust link is from California. This is Washington. Different state, different laws.
     
  10. Steve Saville

    Steve Saville Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    2,965
    Likes Received:
    591
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    Anyone want my tax bill?
     
  11. Bradley Miller

    Bradley Miller Dances with fish

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2012
    Messages:
    476
    Likes Received:
    133
    Location:
    Tacoma
    Wow.

    Ok, first of all.....the size of the 'tax bill' is only relevant to this discussion if the money in question is calculated with the actual ownership of the intertidal zone included. In other words, once again, do you or do you NOT have any sort of title to the intertidal zone? If not, then the size of your property taxes is irrelevant. And no, I do NOT want to pay it. But thats not the issue here. If your 'beach front' property does not include ownership of the land (see the above post regarding beaches that Washington sold off....) then it's not yours. Regardless of what you pay in taxes. Yes or no?

    At any rate, (pardon the pun), I agree it's best to avoid all of this hassle and hard feelings if possible.
    And Steve.......do you own waterfront? Can I fish there? Please? :)

    And yet another comment....there is an ongoing discussion in the 'watercraft' forum about kayaks.
    It is my understanding that as long as you're floating, you're not trespassing. A small kayak can float in a couple of inches of water sooooooooo this seems to be a good solution to some potential trespassing issues. Leave no trace!
     
  12. dryflylarry

    dryflylarry "Chasing Riseforms"

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    4,141
    Likes Received:
    656
    Location:
    Near the Fjord

    Here's Washington States Doctrine:
    https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/publications/93054.pdf
     
  13. jeff bandy

    jeff bandy Make my day

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    2,860
    Likes Received:
    1,132
    Location:
    Edmonds, Wa.
    Quote from that. "The opinions expressed in this report do not represent State
    of Washington, Washington Department of Ecology"
     
  14. SeaRun Fanatic

    SeaRun Fanatic Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2005
    Messages:
    427
    Likes Received:
    22
    Location:
    Northwest, WA
    Yep.

    Leland - It does seem more than a little arrogant to initiate a thread suggesting that flyfishers ignore legal, posted signage. I agree with those who feel that all tidelands should be public, and what you do personally is your call, but as a representative of Orvis, I think you should err on the side of what is legal. Do you recommend other illegal fishing behavior simply because you don't agree with the law?
     
  15. Jim Wallace

    Jim Wallace Smells like low tide.

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    5,959
    Likes Received:
    738
    Location:
    Cranberry Country...a glorified coastal swamp!
    I don't like to trespass on posted property. That doesn't mean that I always won't do it. There are situations where I might stretch the boundaries a bit, but since I leave only tracks in the sand that are gone after the next tide, I wouldn't feel that I'd be doing any harm. I wouldn't be there long, and there would have to be some compelling reason (the presence of fish) for taking a chance on getting "evicted." That said, I know of enough public places where I can fish from the beach, or launch my yak, so that my minor trespassing has been a very rare occurrence.

    I don't even think its legal to drop anchor on someones tidelands. Even that may be "trespassing." Somebody, anybody, please correct me if I'm wrong. I do know that oyster growers don't like anchors gouging up their oyster beds.

    Otherwise, I may eventually end up having to get one of those spendy Minnkota electrics with a GPS "smart" controller that will hold the boat in position, without having to anchor.
    Anyway, this might be a possible solution for fishing over private tidelands, so that one does not have to worry so much about their anchor "trespassing" on someone's private tidelands in current or wind.