A win for Elwha Steelhead this year

Discussion in 'Steelhead' started by Ringlee, Feb 28, 2012.

  1. Ringlee

    Ringlee Doesn't care how you fish Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,830
    Likes Received:
    50
    Location:
    Somewhere you don't know about, WA
    http://wildsteelheadcoalition.org/2012/02/agreement-protects-wild-elwha-steelhead-from-hatchery-release/

    http://wildfishconservancy.org/about/press-room/press-releases/interim-agreement-protects-wild-elwha-steelhead-from-hatchery-release

    Interim Agreement Protects Wild Elwha Steelhead From Hatchery Release
    Non-native hatchery steelhead will not be released into the Elwha River and its tributaries this year, say four conservation groups that earlier this month filed suit against federal agencies and officials of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe (in their official capacities) for releases of hatchery fish into the Elwha. The groups announced today that they have reached an agreement with the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe (LEKT), where the four groups agreed not to seek a preliminary injunction against the LEKT’s release of hatchery-raised “Chambers Creek” steelhead, and the LEKT agreed not to release those fish this year. Normally, the fish would have likely been released sometime in April.
     
  2. Tool Fly

    Tool Fly Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    seattle, wa
    That is outstanding news! Just curious, what happens to all those steelhead smolts ready to be dumped into a river? Do they go contaminate the genetics of another river? Fish meal? The sooner they get out of that hatchery so no "accidental releases" can happen, the happier I will be!
     
  3. Ringlee

    Ringlee Doesn't care how you fish Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Messages:
    1,830
    Likes Received:
    50
    Location:
    Somewhere you don't know about, WA
    Not sure what the plan is to do with the smolt at this time.
     
  4. JS

    JS Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,078
    Likes Received:
    189
    Good news, for sure. Hopefully they get the picture and drop the issue all together.
     
  5. Jason Decker

    Jason Decker Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,639
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Issaquah, WA
    Home Page:
    duplicate post in the main forum
     
  6. Ed Call

    Ed Call Mumbling Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Messages:
    19,552
    Likes Received:
    4,550
    Location:
    Kitsap Peninsula
    Here is to hoping those smolts get put in a sterile river void of wild runs and not "accidentally spilled" in April.
     
  7. KerryS

    KerryS Ignored Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2001
    Messages:
    8,377
    Likes Received:
    4,320
    Location:
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    Any bets?
     
  8. jeff27

    jeff27 hippy down talker

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2011
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    lacey, washington
    fuck it! put those smolts in my lake!!! lets see what happens!
     
  9. Loren E

    Loren E Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    San Rafael, CA
    Thanks Chris and the rest of the crew at the WSC for your hard work on this!!
     
  10. gt

    gt Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,617
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    sequim, WA
    and to think, a few folks on this BB took the position that the treaty tribes were untouchable. great work by our very own LOCAL conservation groups.
     
  11. Richard Torres

    Richard Torres Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,415
    Likes Received:
    94
    A positive step in the right direction.

    Next is to convince them not to plant them in the future...
     
  12. Nooksack Mac

    Nooksack Mac Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,246
    Likes Received:
    290
    Location:
    Bellingham, WA, USA.
    It's better than nothing. But it bothers me because it fits a classic political dynamic. When politicians get outraged pushback against their announced agenda, they rarely announce that they're sorry, it was a terrible idea, what were they thinking?, and they'll never mention it again. Instead, they announce a postponement, which reduces the counterpressure. Then they bide their time a while, before going ahead with their agenda.
     
  13. gt

    gt Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    2,617
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    sequim, WA
    the law suit has not been withdrawn, it is still hanging out there.
     
  14. Tejano

    Tejano Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Austin, Tx
    Is there some category similar to a Wild and Scenic River status that would also include no non indigenous fish stocking? Needs to be made permanent.
     
  15. Chris Johnson

    Chris Johnson Member: Native Fish Society

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    2,977
    Likes Received:
    1,119
    Location:
    Bellingham Wa.

    the state could designate it a wild steelhead management area, or gene bank, but I don't see that happening. But then again, I didn't think the LEK would back off from the chambers creek plants either.