camera preferences???

Discussion in 'Photography / Video' started by Michael Thompson, Apr 23, 2009.

  1. Michael Thompson

    Michael Thompson the flavor of BADFISH

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    camano island wa
    Home Page:
    im going to take the plunge and get a quality camera. mainly to snap shots while fishing. i want something that can do it all, and do it all well. but primarily outdoor action shots, and some thing that has some serious range. im looking at dropping 600 to 1600 bucks on one, i would prefer the cheaper end of that spectrum but if some one says there is one in high that would suit me,:thumb: i would love to hear about it.
     
  2. Kent Lufkin

    Kent Lufkin Remember when you could remember everything?

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    7,175
    Likes Received:
    1,267
    Location:
    Not sure
    Canon G10. It's not waterproof so keep it in a ziploc or be really careful around water. Otherwise, it's likely gonna be a far better camera than you are a photographer.

    K
     
  3. Itchy Dog

    Itchy Dog Some call me Kirk Werner

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Messages:
    3,895
    Likes Received:
    554
    Location:
    Doo-vall
    Home Page:
    I suppose two cameras is out of the question? A nice waterproof point-and-shoot that you can keep handy in your wader pocket and not worry about dunking, and then a nice DSLR that can reside safely inside a waterproof bag in your boat or pack for when you don't need to get to it real quickly? Like rods, can't have just one camera ; )
     
  4. Josh

    Josh dead in the water

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    859
    Location:
    NW Washington
    If you need an SLR, go to adorama.com and look at what they have in stock for refurbished Canon's. Lots of good deals there and Canon stands behind it's refurbs.

    If you need a waterproof point and shoot for fishing trips, take a look at the Pentax W60 or the Olympus 1030sw. I prefer the Pentax but a bunch of guys here have the Olympus and like it fine. I'd stay away from the new Canon waterproof, it's a bit big/chunky to take fishing. The new panasonic waterproof is nice looking and specs, but I haven't done more than play with the pre-production model at the trade show.
     
  5. Dustin Bise

    Dustin Bise Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    509
    [​IMG]

    with one of these

    [​IMG]


    im am on an ANTI DSLR bender.
     
  6. Josh

    Josh dead in the water

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    859
    Location:
    NW Washington
    Not me. The new Canon 5DmkII is balls to the wall. ISO 25,000 you say? Hells yes. HD video? Why sure. It's a great camera.

    The Canon G10 is a cool camera, I've got one sitting next to me as I type this that I'm supposed to be writing a review about. But anyone considering one needs to be sure that they don't want a point and shoot or a DSLR instead. The "prosumer" cameras can either be the best of all worlds, or a "jack of all trades, master of none" depending on what you are looking for. They are too big for easy pocketablilty, but aren't as full featured as a real DSLR.
     
  7. Jason Decker

    Jason Decker Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    2,626
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Issaquah, WA
    Home Page:
    i have a panasonic lumix DMC LX2 it has a killer leica lens and shoots with a 16:9 aspect ratio. killer camera!
    [​IMG]
    i have my eye on the new pentax w60 its a great camera.
    [​IMG]
    i have the older w20 and it works great
    [​IMG]

    in fact, i have a Canon G6 that i'd like to sell.

    [​IMG]

    JD
     
  8. Josh

    Josh dead in the water

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    859
    Location:
    NW Washington
    The LX3 is an even better camera than the already good LX2. I'm absolutely stoked on it. this was my opinion after only a few weeks. I like it even more now:

    http://photo.net/equipment/panasonic/lx3/first-look-review
     
  9. jcnewbie

    jcnewbie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kent, Washington
    After determining that my Olympus 500 DSLR was waaay to big, bulky and heavy to pack around while fishing, I bought an Olympus SW 850 (Ithink?) last year....shock proof & waterproof, very small and easy to carry & use. Now if I could just catch some fish to take pictures of it would be even better.....sheeeeesh!! :rolleyes:

    Jc
     
  10. rattlesnakeflyguy

    rattlesnakeflyguy Harrison

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    378
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    E34
    Olympus Stylus SW 850 or 1050...really good camera. Waterproof, shockproof, all that great stuff. Quality shots for rugged anglers.
     
  11. KerryS

    KerryS Ignored Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2001
    Messages:
    7,446
    Likes Received:
    2,806
    Location:
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    Canon is getting to much press here. I say for the prosumer DSLR to take a look at the Nikon D90. High ISO, live view, video, and the best glass in the biz.
     
  12. Josh

    Josh dead in the water

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    859
    Location:
    NW Washington
    "The best glass" huh? Hmmmm...I don't know about that. Seems like you'd see more "black" lenses at events like this:

    http://www.kosoof.com/photo/00018-olampic05.jpg

    All joking aside, lens quality is about the price you pay for it. Canon/Nikon offer both amazing lenses and pathetic ones. At the high end they are both excellent and worth every penny (if you've got the pennies). If you really want to play in the realm of amazing glass, check out the offerings from Leica or Zeiss. But then we start to get into the world of "test chart" vs "real world" and how important slight MTF graph differences are.

    However, I do agree with Kerry. The Nikon D90 is a quality camera well worth consideration.
     
  13. Tom Palmer

    Tom Palmer Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    178
    Likes Received:
    47
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    If you can wait a few more days, Nikon’s new D5000 is about to be released. Read the NY Times thoughts on the camera here and have some sample photos here.

    Great camera and nicely fits the niche between consumer and pro models.

    Tom
     
  14. Josh

    Josh dead in the water

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    859
    Location:
    NW Washington
    That NYT article is crap. They are comparing two VASTLY different cameras there. It's like comparing a Ford Ranger and a El Camino and saying "they are both compact trucks". Stupid. One is an interchangeable lens large sensor camera and the other is a small sensor fixed lens "prosumer" camera. ANY large sensor camera is going to wipe the floor with a small sensor camera in terms of image quality, particularly in low-light/high-ISO performance.

    The D5000 is very likely to be a great camera. I played with a pre-production model a few months ago at the PMA tradeshow and it looked plenty good. But the D5000's real competition is the soon to be released Canon T1i, not the small sensor SX1 IS.
     
  15. Josh

    Josh dead in the water

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    859
    Location:
    NW Washington