camera preferences???

Discussion in 'Photography / Video' started by Michael Thompson, Apr 23, 2009.

  1. KerryS

    KerryS Ignored Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2001
    Messages:
    7,363
    Likes Received:
    2,679
    Location:
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    Canon had the "pro" market in its pocket for quite some time after the move to digital. I wonder how many of those white lenses are a result of previous large investments in the Canon system and if given the opportunity some might switch to black if that investment wasn't there. Anyway, I was trolling for you Josh. I knew you would not let my comment "best glass" go by. I also know you have far more experience in this than I do and thank you for the thumbs up on the D90.
     
  2. Old Man

    Old Man Just an Old Man

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2002
    Messages:
    24,390
    Likes Received:
    3,308
    Location:
    Dillon, Mt
    I tried to carry a camera with me. But after I catch a fish I let it go. Then I remember I had a camera with me. But I really don't like to take shots of fish by my lonesome. To much fumbling around to do a good shot. I tried a couple with a camera phone but I end up cutting part of the fish off.

    So I just try to remember how the fish looked instead of having it pose for me.

    Jim
     
  3. Dustin Bise

    Dustin Bise Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2007
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    509
    now if only you could remember!
     
  4. 808steelheader

    808steelheader Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Springfield, OR
    Pentax Optio W30 works great for me, is waterproof and takes good fish and river scene pics. I used to lug a Nikon F100 and some fast glass in a dry bag and it was such a pain to access I took few pics that I should have because I don't like to interrupt my fishing.
    Todd
     
  5. Michael Thompson

    Michael Thompson the flavor of BADFISH

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    camano island wa
    Home Page:
    THANKS A TON for all the input! it looks like i really have my work cut out for me. i really appreciate all the posts.
     
  6. KerryS

    KerryS Ignored Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2001
    Messages:
    7,363
    Likes Received:
    2,679
    Location:
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    Hey Josh, a different view of the Olympic photogs. This one shows more Nikon shooters than Canon. Wonder what happened there?
    [​IMG]
     
  7. Les Johnson

    Les Johnson Les Johnson

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,590
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    .Redmond, WA
    have an Olympus E-410 with two lenses that is a very compact SLR that produces great high resolution photos. It has all of the bells ans whistles that I'll ever need. I had a point-and-shoot Olympus spashproof for several years but gave it a friend. My wife Carol uses an Olympus poin-and-shoot splash proof that does a good job as well.
    I am considering a compact digital waterproof camera to carry while on the river, or sticking underwater over the gunwale of a boat for pictures. I am hsestant to carry the E-410 in such situations.
    Cameras have gotten so good and are advancing in technology so rapidly that probably half of the ones mentioned on this thread are already obsolete.
    Les
     
  8. Josh

    Josh dead in the water

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,308
    Likes Received:
    839
    Location:
    NW Washington
    Yeah, I saw that one as well, but obviously picked the one that made my joke better.

    In all truthfulness, the "white lens" dominance at sporting events started to wain a few years back when Nikon finally got it's butt in gear to offer high fps digital bodies, IS/VR lenses, lenses with focusing motors, and full frame DSLR's. I would bet ther there are still more pro sports guys using Canon than Nikon, but the difference is probably much less than before.
     
  9. Dehlan G

    Dehlan G Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    343
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    UW
    I got a Pentax Optio W30 a couple years ago. It takes nice shots and is waterproof but apparently NOT shockproof. Because of that, 1/3 of the viewing screen is broken and doesn't show, so its sometimes a pain to take pics. I'm not a photographer at all so I might not know what exactly you're looking for.
     
  10. tkww

    tkww Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2006
    Messages:
    625
    Likes Received:
    160
    Location:
    WA
    The D3 was indeed a big turning point, combined with the 1Dm3 focusing issues. VR in the long lenses hasn't hurt, that's for sure. But yes, I think there are still a lot more canon shooters than Nikon.

    Canon's f4 glass is something Nikon still hasn't matched. (Sigh.)

    That said, I think the majority of Nikon's low-end lenses out-perform the canon's low-end lenses. (I'm think particularly of the lenses aimed at the DX/APS-C cameras.) Canon's budget lenses can be real turds, IMO. If you're willing to buy up into the L series then Canon has some fine glass to offer. And more options too.
     
  11. Brian Magee

    Brian Magee Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    I carry my Canon Rebel XSI everywhere I go. For now I use the kit lense which sucks but with finally getting back to work my new F4 lense will finally come off of lay away. I have a tamarac backpack for it which holds the camera and lenses in the bottom with accessories in a pocket on the front bottom of the bag. I don't pack much when I carry my flies so the upper back is big enough to carry my leaders, license, knives, forceps, scissors, camera manual, 1 Scientific Angler medium size nymph box loaded with flies and a large Scientific Angler Steamer boxes that cant possibly hold another fly ( I know broke the clip closing it :rofl:), and several pens. Also has 2 water bottle pockets on the side. For the most part the camera isn't the bad for lugging around considering it has a smaller frame than any Nikon DSLR. you can get into one for around $500-700 depending where you shop and it will hang with all the top camera's out there. I would seriously go to a photography shop before buying and take photo's with everything they have before buying though. I was a long time Nikon user but found the smaller body a lot nicer to use with my activities plus my girl friend has very small hands and loves it.
     
  12. Chris Scoones

    Chris Scoones Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    3,640
    Likes Received:
    690
    Location:
    North Bend, WA
    Gotta disagree with any Canon G10 props. Canon has their heads up their marketing asses with that camera, IMO. It's too bad really as the functionality of it is great, but the glass is slow, the MPixel's way too much for it's small sensor resulting in poor performance beyond ISO 200, worthless beyond 400. Bought and returned. Somehow get the glass to f2-2.8, slap a 2/3 CMOS in, lower the MP to 10M from 14.8MP, and it'll be a good performer. Been waiting on that for too long though, and Canon seams to know better than to change, so...

    Thinking pretty seriously about that Lumix LX3 but but naturally being around water constantly and it not having a threaded lense for a polarizer filter it'll be a hard sell.

    No budget for the 5mkII unfortunately, or the glass I'd want with it, but that's a nifty DSLR.
     
  13. Josh

    Josh dead in the water

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,308
    Likes Received:
    839
    Location:
    NW Washington
    That has been the case with the "G" series for some time now. They sell a boatload of them. I have come to the conclusion that those of us who want high iso performance and fast glass are in the minority as far as this class of camera goes.

    There are some price/size/technical limitations that make some of that pretty unlikely.

    Both panasonic and Lensmate make filter/accessory-lens adapters for the LX3. I think the Panasonic one is the DMW-LA4, but you should check on that. They are essentially the same type of thing that the Canon G series uses for filters. Kind of bulky, but they work.