Digital cameras

Discussion in 'Photography / Video' started by Curtis, Oct 17, 2003.

  1. Curtis

    Curtis New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    859
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bothell
    My camera just went tits up, I am seeing all of these awesome pictures, My camera didn't take very good close up pictures. Any suggestions?:dunno
     
  2. Rob Bodkin

    Rob Bodkin Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mukilteo, WA
    I carry a Kodak DX4330. It fits in the vest, though is not as small as some others I've seen, is a 3.1 mega pixel and is really solid and bullet proof. If memory serves it was around $350.

    I have used digital cameras in my work since 1996 and I've always had really good luck with Kodak. I've had 4 and never had to replace one due to it breaking, I usually upgrade every other year or so.

    There is a less expensive version, still with a good docking option and good mega pixel size that one of my employee's uses and we honestly can't tell the difference in photo clarity or usefulness. Mine has more bells and whistles, but we never use them.

    We work outside every day, year round and these cameras take a bit of rain, a few drops on the ground and general rough treatment. We are very happy with them.

    Good Luck.
     
  3. TANGLES

    TANGLES Richh

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Lake Forest Park, Washington, USA.
    I've been using the CooPix Canon 880for our magazine and, of course, my own stuff for a couple years and really like it. Don't think they make it anymore but have new versions of the same thing. Get at least 3.0 Megapixals for clarity and good printing down the road. Got it through B&H Photograpy out of New York. It's on the web and sometimes has some super deals on "open boxes" and reconditioned cameras.
     
  4. boneman

    boneman Guest

    Sony has a digital CyberShot model that is waterproof to 5 feet. It is very small, but I can't comment on its performance or value since all I've done is play with it at the electronics store.
     
  5. msteudel

    msteudel Mark Steudel

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,168
    Likes Received:
    109
    Location:
    Seattle.
    Home Page:
    Doesn't Nikon make the Cool Pix line?

    The leading digital camera makers right now are Canon and Nikon.

    Canon makes the great "elf" series, which is about the size of a deck of cards.
    They also make the S serries which is pretty robust and good cost ratio to camera.
    I have a G2, which has a flip out lcd screen that is great for taking pictures from any angle, you could probably still find these.

    The whole cool pix line from Nikon is awesome, haven't used them but all the reviews are good.

    There is only one water resistant camera that I'm aware of, which I think is a olympus.

    3.0 mp is about a low as you want to go, but if all you are doing is making 4x5 prints and posting to the web, that;s all you ever need ... If you ever want to blow a picture up bigger than 8x10 then you should get a higher mega pixel count.

    Couple of things you might want to think about

    What type of memory does it use? Compact flash is my favorite, cheap and you can get huge sizes, Smart media is limited to 128 megs, and anything proprietary just plain sucks, imho.

    How fast will it take a picture? Cheaper cameras take longer to calculate, focus and snap the picture, not so good when you are trying to snap a picture of a fish.

    A great site for reviews is

    http://www.dpreview.com

    If you have more specific questions I might be able to answer em ...

    Mark
     
  6. Kent Lufkin

    Kent Lufkin Remember when you could remember everything?

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    7,183
    Likes Received:
    1,295
    Location:
    Not sure
    Digicam technology is in a huge state of flux as makers race to introduce new models with more features at lower price points in time for the Holiays. I use digitals every day and also photos from pros with high-end digital systems.

    For my 2 cents worth I'd ignore the whole megapixel arms race and digital zooms and concentrate instead on the optical zoom ratio. A camera with a 3x optical zoom or better will generally be a better camera, all other things being equal. I'd also compare similar photos taken by different cameras. Kodak photos tend to be grainier than others while Nikons tend to produce duller colors, especially bright colors. Go to http://www.steves-digicams.com and navigate to the product reviews section. You can narrow your selection down based on image size and price and then see actual photos taken by each camera.

    Whatever you buy, get extra batteries as well as a couple of the largest memory cards available (check out Costco for great prices.) Finally, short of buying an underwater housing, there are NO waterproof digitals. If it gets wet, it's toast. I dunked a Canon S30 last year in Alaska and it cost me less to replace it than to have it repaired.


    "Fly tying techniques aren't about knowing the obscure, they're about understanding the simple." ~ Neil Patterson
     
  7. Rob Blomquist

    Rob Blomquist Formerly Tight Loops

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    1,343
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA.
    I have a Fuji FinePix 2650 with 2.0 MegaPixel resolution. I think it is a great little camera that can do short movies in addition to still shots.

    Its not the most solid bulletproof camera, but on the net, it is selling for $125-125.

    I have no idea why anyone would think that a 2.0 MP is too low a resolution, for me it is ideal. One needs to realize that at 1024x768 a 17" monitor looks pretty good. and yet, it is only .7 of a MP. So, I say that 2.0 MP is plenty of resolution unless you want to make poster size prints.

    Don't over buy resolution, its only there to make folks need to think they should upgrade.
     
  8. Peter Pancho

    Peter Pancho Active Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,771
    Likes Received:
    25
    Location:
    Gig Harbor,WA
    Home Page:
    Kodak CX4300 3.2 megapixals

    http://www.digital-cameras.info/kodak-cx4300.htm

    All this for only $180.00 at Walmart if they still have them, got it last Christmas.
    If I drop this in the water forever, I won't have a cow due to its less than half of the price of most high end cameras out there.

    Good luck! Peter ><>

    "Follow Me and I will make you fishers of Men" Matthew 4:19
     
  9. Old Man

    Old Man Just an Old Man

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2002
    Messages:
    26,794
    Likes Received:
    5,383
    Location:
    Dillon, Mt
    I found out that they don't fix them if they do a swim. Sent in a Power Shot S40 to get repaired after it got a little wet and they sent it back saying it wasn't repairable. I now have a Olympus D-520 Zoom 2.0 Megapixels. It even does the short movie thing. But I just got it for fishing pics. But I don't get to use it as My catching is wanting.

    Jim

    P/S cost $125.00 plus tax
     
  10. DLoop

    DLoop Creating memories one cast at a time

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Washington.
    Canon S400 + Canon WP DC800 Waterproof Case ~$650 total.
     
  11. DLoop

    DLoop Creating memories one cast at a time

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2003
    Messages:
    228
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Washington.
    >
    >Canon S400 + Canon WP DC800 Waterproof Case ~$650
    >total.
    >

    ooops, make that ~$550 total.
     
  12. Kent Lufkin

    Kent Lufkin Remember when you could remember everything?

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    7,183
    Likes Received:
    1,295
    Location:
    Not sure
    Is your waterproof case one of the clear plastic scuba ones? Where'd you find it?


    "Fly tying techniques aren't about knowing the obscure, they're about understanding the simple." ~ Neil Patterson
     
  13. Jason

    Jason Trout Bum

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2003
    Messages:
    666
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Edmonds, WA
  14. TANGLES

    TANGLES Richh

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    423
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Lake Forest Park, Washington, USA.
    Opps, meant Nikon Cool Pix. Nice size. I dropped it once and cracked the case and got it fixed for about $60. Pretty reasonable.
    I agree, ignore the digital zoom numbers, optical zoom is what counts.
     
  15. msteudel

    msteudel Mark Steudel

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,168
    Likes Received:
    109
    Location:
    Seattle.
    Home Page:
    I can't wait to get my hands on the new Canon Digital Rebel .. 899 for the body! Digital SLR's are finally getting into the more reasonable range ...