KFR: Digital SLR Cameras

Discussion in 'Photography / Video' started by Evan Burck, Dec 2, 2007.

  1. KerryS

    KerryS Ignored Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2001
    Messages:
    7,451
    Likes Received:
    2,811
    Location:
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    18 foot river sled = $15,000.00
    4 wheel drive tow vehicle = $35,000.00
    12 foot lake boat & motor = $1000.00
    Pontoon boat = $900.00
    12 or more spey rods @ $300-800.00 each
    12 or more reels @ $150-800.00 each
    Another 12 or more single handed rods and reels $150.00 and up each
    Waders = $400.00
    2 pair boots (studded & non-studded) @ $100.00 ea.
    Rain coat = $300.00
    misc. = $500.00 to $1000.00
    Fly tying = another $2000.00 to $3000.00

    I got a lot of camera equipment to buy.:p
     
  2. Evan Burck

    Evan Burck Fudge Dragon

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2007
    Messages:
    6,592
    Likes Received:
    1,975
    Location:
    Duvall, wa
    Home Page:
    haha, i don't plan on getting THAT into it. It's more something to complement my outdoor activities, and to get better shots of the things i see/do out in them. i've seen a lot of amazing scenery and stuff that i was completely unable to capture with a point and shoot.

    thanks for the advice guys!
     
  3. BFK

    BFK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    332
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    North Sound, Wash.
    Kerry-- You forgot the $30,000 saltwater boat..you still have a ways to go.
     
  4. Jay Allyn

    Jay Allyn The Poor-Student Fly Fisher

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bellingham/Puyallup, WA
    I own the Canon 350D (that's the Rebel XT, 8mp). I personally wouldn't buy the original Rebel (the 300D). It's much slower, more bulky, and a bit harder to use. Keep in mind that the kit lens that comes with these cameras sucks too and while it does take pictures, if you want to do it efficiently you will need another lens....or two or three. It's kind of like owning different fly rods in a sense. So plan on quite a few hundred dollars more (if not over a thousand) on better lenses.

    On that note. I own some nice camera equipment and love to take pictures (I hope to do it for a living sometime). But I hardly ever take it fishing with me. It's too big and bulky and worth too much money to risk dipping it in the water. I find myself usually leaving it in the trunk of my car.
     
  5. dryflylarry

    dryflylarry "Chasing Riseforms"

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    4,141
    Likes Received:
    656
    Location:
    Near the Fjord
    I've got the FujiFinePix A800 and it is great for quick fishing shots. What I like best is it focuses very quickly (better than most others I checked out-my Son has a Nikon Coolpix which is junk!) , is 8.3 megapixel, and get mine for $149! If you drop it in the water, it's not too big of loss... Try this for an investment before you spend the big bucks!
     
  6. LD

    LD Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    1,131
    Likes Received:
    114
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    After recently upgrading our camera from a 2.4 to 7.1 mp (cannon as 710, perfect for wath we do), we did notice better pictures. But the other thing we noticed is mp eats hard drive space at an alarming rate.
     
  7. Chris Puma

    Chris Puma hates waking up early

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    950
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    stumptown

    smart people don't pay for adobe products and certainly don't spend 2k on their computers.

    link removed.

    have fun.
     
  8. SteelieD

    SteelieD Non Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    1,001
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    In a van down by the river
    For that reason I ended up with a Pentax Optio W Series for fishing. Easy to use and the image quality is pretty good. You can pick up one of the older models at a reasonable price. I pretty much keep mine in my pocket and take it with me most everywhere.

    I'm in the same process and may ultimately end up with the Nikon D40. Not for fish necessarily but for scenery, kids, etc... MP's are over rated. The camera that died (due to "water exposure":rofl:) was a Cannon 2MP point and shoot. Took incredible pix. The 'prosumer' class are probably what you are in the market for, but, buy it from a shop where you can get the extended 'no questions asked' warranty. Water exposure happens!
     
  9. Jay Allyn

    Jay Allyn The Poor-Student Fly Fisher

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    852
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bellingham/Puyallup, WA

    Ahh...but a smarter person would buy a legit version of Photoshop or any software if they where using it for business purposes and making a profit. But then again not everybody will do this.
     
  10. Chris Puma

    Chris Puma hates waking up early

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    950
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    stumptown
    i still saved you a hell of a lot of money with newegg! :)
     
  11. kodiaksalmon

    kodiaksalmon Jeff B.

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Muskie country!
    When you're comparing 2.4 to 7.1 you will indeed see a difference. I remember going from 3.0 to 7.1, and it was indeed noticable. But from my 7.1 to my 10.2 DSLR, the difference is negligible. The difference comes in my ability to use the right lens for the job with the DSLR.

    I'm not a photography expert, so don't everyone jump on me all at one time, but I have read in many places that 6.0 mp is considered to be on the same level of resolution as film. Meaning, if you want to have a picture blown up to 8x10, you'll see pixelation with a 2.4 mp camera, whereas you won't with 6.0 and above.

    The other thing people often forget is that all mp's aren't the same size. The digital sensor on various cameras are of different sizes, and aspect ratios. Take two 10 mp cameras, one with a larger sensor, and it's mp's will be larger than in the camera with the smaller sensor, yet they're both 10.0 mp cameras.

    Again all you photo pros, don't crucify me all at once. I'm just relaying what I've read in the photo rags. :ray1:
     
  12. Kent Lufkin

    Kent Lufkin Remember when you could remember everything?

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    7,175
    Likes Received:
    1,267
    Location:
    Not sure
    Clearly you haven't been paid a visit by the software piracy police. A good friend just had to cough up $42K (yep, $42,000) in fines for using pirated versions of Adobe software in his design studio.

    You may think you're somehow above the law, but believe me pal, when you've gotta take an unwanted second mortgage on your home you'll look back on this post and wish you hadn't been such a smart ass.

    K
     
  13. Josh

    Josh dead in the water

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2006
    Messages:
    3,330
    Likes Received:
    860
    Location:
    NW Washington
    This is one of those statistics that is very hard to actually prove. As it's really up to each person to decided if the photo from camera A is better than the photo from camera B. I will say that for 90% of the people shooting photos, a camera between 6-10mp is going to be just fine.

    You have worded this a bit wrong, but the basic idea is correct...and very important. A 10mp sensor chip that is the size of your fingernail has it's imaging pixels crammed together in a much smaller space than a sensor chip that is the same size as a 35mm frame of film. When crammed onto a tiny sensor, the resulting image is not going to be as high quality.
     
  14. Chris Puma

    Chris Puma hates waking up early

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    950
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    stumptown
    good thing i don't have illegally licensed copies of adobe! :thumb:

    you're risking it if you're using illegal copies for business purposes. sucks for your friend but it's a common know fact.
     
  15. Kent Lufkin

    Kent Lufkin Remember when you could remember everything?

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    7,175
    Likes Received:
    1,267
    Location:
    Not sure
    Hmmm. . .

    Didn't you just write this?

    So which is it smart guy?

    K