Mt Rainier Tragedy Opens Nonsense Debate

Discussion in 'Fly Fishing Forum' started by Desolate, Jan 3, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Desolate

    Desolate New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Puyallup, WA
    Sorry, noted.

    This is exactly what I was thinking when I originally heard about this topic.

    It was not my intent to make this a for or against guns thread, but I guess it was inevitable. My original intent was to focus on what should be the topic like Flyborg mentioned.
     
  2. mgamby

    mgamby Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2004
    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    vancouver, WA, USA.
    Fly Borg nailed it....

    And the comment about public sector employees not having an opinion, is by far the funniest/ most idiotic thing I have read in a long time..... :)


    Oh, and I dont call people that get kicked out of the military "Veterans".
    A dishonorable discharge does not make you a "veteran", it makes you "dishonorable".
     
  3. fifafu

    fifafu Guest

    You guys hijacking the thread are out of line. This is an issue that belongs on this site. Does anyone fish in Glacier? or Yellowstone? or Olympic? I have and I would like to pack in all three when camping/fishing. We should be able to debate whether or not guns should be allowed and the abhorant tactics being used by scum like Mr Wade in trying to take that right away...again.

    This is a fly fishing issue.
     
  4. wadin' boot

    wadin' boot Donny, you're out of your element...

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,865
    Likes Received:
    3,650
    Location:
    Wallingford, WA
    Home Page:
    Not in my book. It's a gun control issue. If you want to debate gun control and how abhorrent opposite views are to yours find another format or label your thread NFR or SFR.

    My heart goes out to that Park Ranger and her family.
     
  5. fifafu

    fifafu Guest

    It isn't my thread to label and if you fish in the National Parks it is an issue for a fly fishing message board.
    My heart also goes out to hear family and seeing her murder used as a pawn angers me enough to say so.
     
  6. fisherjon

    fisherjon Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Oak Harbor,Washington
    Im sure just a worm pattern would work for crabs when i was a young kid i use to accidently catch crabs off of pile worms all the time
     
  7. Desolate

    Desolate New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Puyallup, WA
  8. Desolate

    Desolate New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Puyallup, WA
  9. dflett68

    dflett68 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    660
    Likes Received:
    245
    Location:
    snohomish
    this is the silliest statement in the whole thread. it's obvious that firearms training would not protect us from trap-doors or giant boulders. hasn't anyone here ever watched cartoons? it's clear we've watched plenty of westerns.

    guns aren't the problem, and they aren't the answer. just enjoy your guns for what they are. enjoy your your quick-draw jason bourne fantasy, buy a lottery ticket every week, and relax with the people who already agree with you.
     
  10. WA-Fly

    WA-Fly Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    336
    Likes Received:
    62
    Location:
    WA
    most criminals don't get guns legally outlawing guns leaves them armed and us not
     
  11. lylelovett666

    lylelovett666 Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2008
    Messages:
    617
    Likes Received:
    117
    Location:
    seattle,wa
    "Ideally, we'd be able to make gun ownership less of an unfettered right and more of a priviledge "From your post Lugan.Living by what the founders laid out is what makes this country what it is.When people start deciding that parts of the constitution are no longer needed or out of date you can bet the rest will soon follow.
     
  12. Builder

    Builder Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    174
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    Missoula, Montana
    Fisherman having been discreetly packing into Glacier park for over thirty years. I would imagine Yellowstone is the same.
     
  13. Gregg Lundgren

    Gregg Lundgren Now fishing on weekdays too!

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Messages:
    590
    Likes Received:
    210
    Location:
    N. Edmonds / Mukilteo, WA
    My revision was perhaps only slightly less silly.
    Mutual self-destruction is often times a great deterent.(see my avatar for details)

    Unfortunately, this lends itself to both sides of the argument. Everybody or nobody? There are no easy answers to be had, and I think this creates even more intensity as we try to work our way though it.
     
  14. Roper

    Roper Idiot Savant

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    5,021
    Likes Received:
    2,238
    Location:
    Glenraven Ranch
    Fools, laws do nothing to assure our safety in the world. They are for lawyers and judges and jailers, that's all. It's all after the fact...and in this case it's too late. My heart goes out to the Rangers family and to the family of the shooter having to live with what their son has done.

    I curse the spineless bastards who jump on these tragedies like ambulance chasing lawyers to push their agendas. And the newspapers, TV stations, and anyone else who posts a picture of the shooter for their profit. The shooters picture should never be seen, it only glorifies what he did...
     
  15. Richard Olmstead

    Richard Olmstead BigDog

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    1,733
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I didn't realize the founders laid out the internet; I thought it was Al Gore!

    The Constitution is a living document. It is changed/modified/interpreted all the time in ways that provide sometimes subtle, sometimes significant differences. Heck, it was amended 10 times before it was two years old! (...and 17 times since then) In fact, the Constitution, itself, provides for the mechanism by which such changes are implemented, including a federal judicial system that is empowered with interpreting the Constitution to adapt to circumstances as they arise.

    I find it ironic that those who cry loudest about the "Founders" and their interpretation of the Constitution are often the least knowledgeable about either the Constitution or the authors' intent.

    We should no more want to go back to 18th century law and constitutional interpretations than we should want to go back to 18th century communications.

    D
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.