NFR: Demise of Livestock killing Cougar

Discussion in 'Fly Fishing Forum' started by Itchy Dog, Apr 19, 2008.

  1. junebug41

    junebug41 Junior Dave Monti fan

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    You presume a lot. Personally, I would not feel any differently at all about cougars or wolves if they killed a domestic animal of mine. I would feel sadness for losing my dog, just as I would if it got hit by a car. I wouldn't respond by seeking out the death of the cougar any more than I would try to kill a driver who ran over my dog, or try to enact laws to prevent anyone from driving in my neighborhood.

    So, no, I wouldn't shoot them too. What I might do is put some thought into effective deterrents, such as a couple of big dogs or a llama, which have proven very vigilant and effective in protecting herd animals. Shooting a cat simply opens up a territory, which is then occupied by another cat. I ask again -- where do you draw the line? Kill 'em all?

    For what it's worth, most ranchers have access to compensatory government funds if their livestock are lost to a protected predator.
     
  2. Brett Angel

    Brett Angel Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    603
    Likes Received:
    75
    Location:
    Sammamish, WA
  3. PT

    PT Physhicist

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,926
    Likes Received:
    1,170
    Location:
    Edmonds, WA
    While we pursue ESA listed wild steelhead where the goal is to pucture their bony mouths with a hunk of sharpened steel only to torture it for a few minutes before (hopefully) a release that doesn't result in it's death.

    It's easy to justify our own pursuits while looking down on other's.
     
  4. Jon Borcherding

    Jon Borcherding New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    534
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    Cougars are not protected. They are not endangered. They are not threatened.
    As stated by an earlier poster, once they acquire a taste for easy prey they tend to continue to kill livestock.
    I can certainly agree that a cage match between a cougar and a llama would be interesting.:rofl:

    JonB
     
  5. Jon Borcherding

    Jon Borcherding New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Messages:
    534
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    I agree that those articles provide some interesting reading.
    It seems that the combination of animal rights activism and attempts to "manage" the damage done by the initiative are causing far more problems than they are solving. This certainly begs the question, Wouldn't the cougar population and the human population both be better off without the ballot box biology mandated by the hound hunting ban?

    JonB
     
  6. Mike Etgen

    Mike Etgen Not Quite A Luddite, But Can See One From Here

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2003
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Port Orchard, Washington, USA.
    As someone "without a dog in the hunt" I really appreciate what Jon said. It seems logical to me that hunting with dogs, especially if the objective was not to kill, would go a long way towards conditioning cougars to fear and avoid dogs and men in particular and mankind in general.

    I recall listening to an interview on NPR with someone who'd written a book about the increasing friction between man and native predators; "The Beast in the Garden: A Modern Parable of Man and Nature" by David Baron.

    During the interview he describes what he feels to be a representative first encounter with a cat by a well-meaning resident who sees the animal at the far end of the yard and gathers the family onto the back deck to watch the cat until it finally does move on. The cat, if it stays put at all, experiences something in that brief encounter that contradicts its instinctive fear of man, and a young cat in particular may get it first conditioning to NOT fear humans. A few more brushes like this, and you may have the beginnings of a cat that does not necessarily feel a need to avoid human contact. The author suggested that the best response to seeing an animal like this is not to gawk and point, but to scream, shout, and raise holy hell, thus reinforcing the instinct that a human is something to avoid.

    I think they're animals that deserve a place on the planet. I do not think of them as cuddly, Disneyized friends and hopefully, should I encounter one, would remember to act like something to be feared, not eaten.

    If, of course I had the chance...
     
  7. junebug41

    junebug41 Junior Dave Monti fan

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Your first statement is a fine example of pointless semantics. While not listed as endangered or threatened, they obviously enjoy a measure of protection. This is demonstrated conveniently by the fact that the livestock owner was obliged to call officials to remove the cat, rather than shooting it himself. I would suspect that he has financial recourse available for his loss, as eastern WA ranchers do.

    While a lion could certainly win a do-or-die matchup against a llama, that's hardly the point. Llamas have a well-deserved reputation for guard duty over herds of livestock. At 400 pounds, and with a nasty disposition, a llama or two represents a risk that a top feline predator doesn't need.

    The entire game plan of a big cat is based on minimizing risk, since an injury is all that's required to tip the balance in favor of prey animals like deer, making it impossible for the cat to hunt successfully. It's why leopards abandon a kill when a hyena shows up, or why a cougar runs up a tree instead of simply turning around and ripping your dogs to pieces.

    I should mention that I don't have any ethical complaints against lion hunters whatsoever. The population in Washington certainly allows for a sustainable hunting season. However, I definitely do not agree that the life of a lion should be discarded lightly over the life of, in this case, one sheep.
     
  8. fullerfly

    fullerfly Calvin Fuller

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    533
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sandpoint, ID
    The simple fact is if a lion eats a sheep, he will come back to eat more sheep. F&G is minimizing the risk of this lion eating another sheep.

    If someone had a Pitt Bull and it killed your pet dog/sheep/etc..would you want it around?
     
  9. Todd123

    Todd123 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Santa Rosa, Ca

    Im completley aware its a blood sport, thats nothing but obvious as catch and release can result in mortality from time to time and flys are tied out of dead animals almost always unless you are a vegan and only use synthetic materials. But the general intent of C&R is not to kill or harm the fish in the long run even though it can happen, doesn't make it much more justified but its a leap by all meens from killing with intent. What I was trying to get across was I think they could have done C&R with that cat if they would have tried, reading the story it sounds like they killed it before even seeing the collar which isn't fair. Id much rather see photo's of these guys tracking down poachers with a smile on their face than out hunting. Its been a long winter and im sure the animal did what it had to do to survive at the time. Im not here to point fingers and im definitely not saying people don't have respect for nature if they fish or hunt, im just saying that alot of people wan't animals like this dead for the wrong reason and really no reason at all at times.

    I have lost numerous pets to coyotes and the like and I don't think at all that gives me permission to kill them in revenge. They don't kill other sentient beings out of hate like the human species does, they eat to survive and its too bad we have only given them a small chunk of earth to roam and do this on.
     
  10. fullerfly

    fullerfly Calvin Fuller

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    533
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sandpoint, ID
    Too mean to post
     
  11. dryflylarry

    dryflylarry "Chasing Riseforms"

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    1,045
    Location:
    Near the Fjord
    The simple fact is: What is so hard about shooting a dart, putting the animal in a temporary cage, driving up into the mountains a couple hundred miles, and releasing it. Ok, 300 miles then.

    We killed the Buffalo, we killed the Beaver, will killed the Otters, we killed the Seals, we killed the Wolves, we killed the Salmon, we killed the Steelhead, we killed the Bald Eagles, we killed ..... on and on. Give me a frigging break.
     
  12. PT

    PT Physhicist

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,926
    Likes Received:
    1,170
    Location:
    Edmonds, WA
    I don't think anyone in this thread has said killing the cat is something to be taken lightly. I see it the other way. People who take the life of an animal usually have a far greater respect for that animal than some animal rights activist who push for laws that only make themselves feel better.
     
  13. fullerfly

    fullerfly Calvin Fuller

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    533
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sandpoint, ID
    It would just come back and eat more sheep....maybe we should just kill all the sheep. As for the dart. Don't you think F&G's $$$ should be spent saving buffalo, beavers, otters, seals, wolves, salmon, steelhead, and bald eagles....


    Are beavers really dead?
     
  14. junebug41

    junebug41 Junior Dave Monti fan

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    372
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    PT, I'd have to disagree on a couple of counts: First, several folks have made comments in this thread that strongly suggest they don't bat an eyelash when any cougar that needs killin' gets what's comin'. That's taking it lightly.

    Second -- I'm far from a tree-hugger or PETA activist conspiring to free lipstick rats, and as a moderate, I'd say that conservation law accomplishes a lot more than making people feel better about themselves.

    Fuller -- sounds like you're of the mind that any animal posing a threat needs to go. We don't agree. If I'm hiking the PCT and a lion takes me down, that's a risk I took in going to a wild place.

    I expect that you will have your druthers eventually. Tigers, jaguars, and cougars will probably survive only as inbred, genetically manipulated populations, completely under human control. That's certainly the path that has been established. Like I said, I'm glad I won't be around to see it.
     
  15. prosopium

    prosopium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    a thousand miles from nowhere

    thats why i have stayed out of this. just typed a response but it was too mean to post so i deleted it. some people just dont get it.

    cougars are already inbred so too bad you're around to see it