Other than WA.....

Discussion in 'Cast & Blast' started by FlyFshn'Fool, Oct 22, 2011.

?
  1. WA

    3 vote(s)
    9.7%
  2. OR

    3 vote(s)
    9.7%
  3. IA

    8 vote(s)
    25.8%
  4. MT

    17 vote(s)
    54.8%
  1. Marc Stelting

    Marc Stelting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW Wash.
    Idaho, Wyoming, New Mexico, Montana. I was born and raised here in Washingotn, then left for a number of years and back again for employment. In those years away from here, it changed... not for the better. Idaho is hard to beat for all-around activities. Aside from steelhead/salmon, Wyoming and New Mexico are outstanding choices, especially for retiring persons due to lower taxation.
     
  2. Methow Roamer

    Methow Roamer Seeker of the Exotic and Aquatic

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Winthrop, WA
    Alaska, or maybe New Jersey.
     
  3. Tyler Sadowski

    Tyler Sadowski Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    35
    Location:
    Kirkland, wa
    My vote goes for Idaho too.
     
  4. FlyFshn'Fool

    FlyFshn'Fool Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2009
    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Where there's water!
    It has been some time since this post started but not much has changed here. I will say, aside from Steelhead, I am really liking Western Montana and Western Wyoming. From a fishing stand point, Oregon is up there too because of the Smallmouth and Steelhead fishing!
     
  5. martyg

    martyg Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,150
    Likes Received:
    158
    Location:
    The world at large
    Actually the Salmon / Steelhead fishing there is second to none as well. The Smallmouth fishing is just epic as well. Silver Bass and the occasional Rainbow and Brown on the Niagara during epic caddis and mayfly hatches that will choke you out. Just no upland birds... The Ruffed Grouse hunting was stellar when I grew up there, and the Pheasant was passable. All the upland has seemed to disappear now though. Deer and Turkey are still great though.
     
  6. speyfisher

    speyfisher Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,175
    Likes Received:
    214
    Location:
    State of Jefferson U.S.A.
    South Dakota has billboards at the state line proclaiming "Welcome to South Dakota. We hunt what we eat. We eat what we hunt. Friends of furry animals not welcome here" People like that can't be all that bad. Too bad they don't have Steelhead.

    Idaho has roadside signs saying game crossing. Not Bambie crossing like in some other states. I wouldn't doubt if road kill was legal in Idaho. And they have Steelhead. Idahoans have a pretty good track record of sorting through all the liberal B.S. & rejecting it, so they get points in my book for that.
     
  7. FlyFshn'Fool

    FlyFshn'Fool Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2009
    Messages:
    252
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Where there's water!
    True, true!

    I'm torn. Love Colorado, but too many people. Idaho is nice, Western WY is good but a bit isolated in terms of variety of fishing and Western MT is looking nice. Oregon is hard to beat too, except for the Cali's moving in, but that issue exists everywhere! I just love the Smallie fishing opportunity in OR, plus the Steelhead, oh and waterfowl hunting too!
     
  8. jeff bandy

    jeff bandy Make my day

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    2,757
    Likes Received:
    1,004
    Location:
    Edmonds, Wa.
    Washington... 102.60 inhabitants per square mile
    Colorado... 49.33 inhabitants per square mile
    Oregon... 40.33 inhabitants per square mile
    Idaho... 19.15 inhabitants per square mile
    Montana... 6.85 inhabitants per square mile
    Wyoming... 5.85 inhabitants per square mile
    Alaska... 1.26 inhabitants per square mile - least

    New Jersey... 1,189.00 inhabitants per square mile - most
    U.S. Average... 88.08 inhabitants per square mile

    Kind of says it all.
     
  9. ribka

    ribka Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,630
    Likes Received:
    316
    Location:
    E WA
    It sure does