Radioactive

Discussion in 'Fly Fishing Forum' started by Gary Thompson, Jan 9, 2014.

  1. FinLuver

    FinLuver Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,593
    Likes Received:
    699
    I heard this..."that the human body gives off more radiation naturally than we'll likely be exposed to from the Japan disaster."...again, it's something I heard.

    Well, I've yet to be able to fly, run faster than a speeding bullet, or shoot webs out my arse...

    I think I'll go fishin'!! :D
     
  2. Alexander

    Alexander Fishon

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    758
    Location:
    WA
    Fishing is fun
     
  3. Olive bugger

    Olive bugger Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    779
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    Catching is funner tho!
     
  4. Grayone

    Grayone Fishin' to the end, Oc.P

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    1,534
    Likes Received:
    250
    Location:
    boring, oregon
    Maybe the radiation will kill something inside you that is very bad!;) Could it be beneficial? Then again maybe not.
     
  5. generic

    generic Justified

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2010
    Messages:
    4,973
    Likes Received:
    1,745
    The stuff coming from any spill/disaster, is cumulative. Meaning one time exposure in small amounts, isn't going to harm you. Over time, the constant exposure builds up. There was a story on BBC news that said one year after the incident, the tuna had elevated levels of radioactivity. Still, not too high, but in the years to come, it will be exponential.

    As far as the "facts" go, where are they getting them? What is the source? I'm pretty sure that any info that "gets out", is more like "given out" by the authorities.

    I'm sure we can all trust that they are giving it to us straight... :rolleyes:

    How many things (predictions) have come and gone, or gone ignored we found ourselves wanting/set back, due to lack of preparation?

    Bottom line, time will tell.
     
  6. Olive bugger

    Olive bugger Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    779
    Location:
    Woodinville, WA
    Really? You can't trust the word of government and those in position of high authority? HUH! That has to be news.

    Next you will tell me that there is no tooth fairy.
     
  7. Dan Nelson

    Dan Nelson Hiker, Fisher, Writer, Bum

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    963
    Likes Received:
    583
    Location:
    Puyallup, WA
    Home Page:

    The National Academy of Sciences specifically addressed the radioactivity in Bluefin Tuna.

    http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/05/30/1221834110.full.pdf html

    The findings were conclusive: They did find radioactive nucleotides in bluefins -- but the doses derived from naturally occurring sources were 3 to 4 times higher than the doses derived from Fukushima.

    BTW: National Academy of Sciences is a private non-profit group charged with providing independent, objective evaluations on matters of science and technology. http://www.nasonline.org/about-nas/mission/ In short, the NAS has no dog in this fight -- they simply seek out the facts and report them as they find them.
     
  8. Dan Nelson

    Dan Nelson Hiker, Fisher, Writer, Bum

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    963
    Likes Received:
    583
    Location:
    Puyallup, WA
    Home Page:
    BTW: If you really want to worry about Radioactive Pollution, forget Fukushima -- the time-lapse video below shows the core source of man-made nuclear pollution in the environment:
     
    Jason Rolfe likes this.
  9. Alexander

    Alexander Fishon

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    758
    Location:
    WA
    Yessir it is! :D
     
  10. Jason Rolfe

    Jason Rolfe Wanderer

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,203
    Likes Received:
    405
    Location:
    the beach
    That blast video it's chilling

    Sent from my HTCONE using Tapatalk
     
  11. Tacoma Red

    Tacoma Red Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,130
    Likes Received:
    763
    Location:
    West World
    We're all "Down Wind-ers".
     
  12. dryflylarry

    dryflylarry "Chasing Riseforms"

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    4,482
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Location:
    Near the Fjord
    We should all care about the people living in Japan first.
     
  13. Dan Page

    Dan Page Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2003
    Messages:
    547
    Likes Received:
    98
    Location:
    Yelm, Wa., USA.
  14. Dan Nelson

    Dan Nelson Hiker, Fisher, Writer, Bum

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    963
    Likes Received:
    583
    Location:
    Puyallup, WA
    Home Page:

    Thanks.

    Most vital information shared in that linked story:

    “The concentration of radioactive materials which will be washed ashore here has no impact whatsoever on our daily life,” he said. “The levels we are measuring, they will not be harmful. They will not have any measurable health impact on humans or any detrimental effects in marine biology.”

    Despite several recent online videos and blog posts claiming that Fukushima radiation is causing widespread contamination of the West Coast and harming fish, scientists say their research so far shows that is not the case.

    Researchers from Stony Brook University in New York and Stanford University’s Hopkins Marine Station tested Pacific Bluefin tuna after the 2011 Fukushima incident. They have published research showing radiation levels were low – less than what people are exposed to by eating a banana or other potassium-rich foods that contain naturally occurring radioactive isotopes — and have been falling ever since.
     
  15. Tacoma Red

    Tacoma Red Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,130
    Likes Received:
    763
    Location:
    West World