RE: Lake Lenore Poachers

Discussion in 'Fly Fishing Forum' started by miyawaki, Jul 28, 2013.

  1. miyawaki

    miyawaki Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2002
    Messages:
    3,445
    Likes Received:
    1,480
    Location:
    Kent, Washington, USA.
  2. zen leecher aka bill w

    zen leecher aka bill w born to work, forced to fish

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    4,200
    Likes Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    Moses Lake, WA
    Thanks for posting this Leland. I hope it is a deterrent for future poachers.
     
  3. Jamie Wilson

    Jamie Wilson Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,083
    Likes Received:
    936
    Location:
    Arlington WA
    still seems kinda light
    I think a $25,000 fine would change some habits
    Most of these guys are professionals - meaning this probably wasn't their first "job"
    Thanks for the update
     
    Eric Denny and freestoneangler like this.
  4. triploidjunkie

    triploidjunkie Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    4,363
    Likes Received:
    4,961
    Location:
    Grand Coulee, WA
    Not nearly harsh enough!!:( It also didn't mention if the truck was returned or not. I have a feeling it was. They'll be back at it soon enough.
     
  5. Jamie Wilson

    Jamie Wilson Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,083
    Likes Received:
    936
    Location:
    Arlington WA
    That's exactly the problem. Just another speed bump in their poacher road - not a deterrent
     
  6. shadowcast

    shadowcast Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    19
    When I came to the part describing how one escaped by swimming through freezing water, I was kinda hoping for something like, "the suspect was later found dead in a nearby park, having perished from hypothermia." What a letdown lol!

    What about the charge of resisting arrest??? Did they forget about that!?
     
  7. Jamie Wilson

    Jamie Wilson Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,083
    Likes Received:
    936
    Location:
    Arlington WA
    no shit
     
  8. Richard Olmstead

    Richard Olmstead BigDog

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    1,733
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    "seized for forfeiture" implies that they did not get the truck back.
    D
     
  9. shadowcast

    shadowcast Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    19
    I like to know how many days they kept it up...
     
  10. Cedar

    Cedar Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    60
    Location:
    South King
    "Seized for forfeiture" in this state just means that law enforcement had legal grounds to take the vehicle because it was being used in the commission of a certain kind of crime. More often than not vehicles are returned because the registered owner wasn't present when the crime was being committed or a judge feels that the seizure would be too much punishment...which I kind of think will be the case here given how low the total fines are (in relationship to the offense).
     
  11. Jim Ficklin

    Jim Ficklin Genuine Montana Fossil

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2008
    Messages:
    6,037
    Likes Received:
    4,836
    Location:
    Columbia Basin
    They should have made them eat all of the fish . . . guts . . .
     
    Jamie Wilson and Cedar like this.
  12. shadowcast

    shadowcast Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Messages:
    116
    Likes Received:
    19
    Dumb question here, but how and to whom might these guys been unloading/selling the fish? With that many fish per outing, I doubt it was for the family BBQ.
     
  13. Peyton00

    Peyton00 Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    2,467
    Likes Received:
    2,103
    Location:
    Puyallup, Wa.
    Gross misdemeanor and low fines. 20 days in jail.... that we all pay for. The truck more than likely will be returned to owner if defense atty ask for it. All this for some recreational fish..... lots of money spent on both sides of the law.
     
    triploidjunkie likes this.
  14. freestoneangler

    freestoneangler Not to be confused with Freestone

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    7,800
    Likes Received:
    2,729
    Location:
    Ruby Valley, MT
    Absolutely ridiculous... and we wonder why this kind of crap keeps happening... this nation is way too lenient on crime.
     
  15. Charles Sullivan

    Charles Sullivan dreaming through the come down

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,229
    Likes Received:
    1,477
    Location:
    bellingham wa
    Home Page:
    I always chuckle when people get worked up because the punishment isn't harsh, believing that a harsher penalty is a signifigant deterrant. The signifigant deterrant is the belief that they may get caught, especially in a case such as this where it is a planned crime. I truly don't know what the recivitism rate is for fish and game crimes but I suspect it isn't as high as we think.
    Having said that, I would have no problem with harsher penalties. I am just not of the opinion that harsher penalties would deter anything, short of a life sentence which does eliminate the possibility of recivitism. Higher chances of getting caught would definately be a deterrant.

    Go Sox,
    cds
     
    Josh likes this.