SRC's in a Lemon Dill Sauce

Discussion in 'Saltwater' started by Go Fish, Sep 2, 2008.

  1. dryflylarry

    dryflylarry "Chasing Riseforms"

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    4,703
    Likes Received:
    1,480
    Location:
    Near the Fjord
    Obviously you are a gearhead. :D
     
  2. constructeur

    constructeur Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    2,033
    Likes Received:
    1,248
    Location:
    Commencement Bay,Wa
    ...and not a fan of punctuation :clown:
     
  3. Ed Call

    Ed Call Mumbling Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Messages:
    20,165
    Likes Received:
    5,510
    Location:
    Kitsap Peninsula
    ...and hostile, opinionated and also have no idea what the lady had or did not have.
     
  4. Abel1

    Abel1 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    260
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Clearview Wa
    Go Fish- I myself believe that you did the right thing. Some here would rather you have a lawyer present and a law ennacted before you say a word! I would say fair is fair and let's just leave it alone.
     
  5. Dale Dennis

    Dale Dennis Formally Double-D

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    530
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Arlington, WA
    It has been my goal to address the TROUT loop hole in the regs. unfortunately I was too late for the 2008 pamphlet rules change this year and but will addressing it in the 2010 changes. Why there is no distinction of Searun Cutthroat in our west side rivers is beyond my compression especially since they are protected in the sound and obviously are more prone to fishing pressure in the river. In my view this adds to the confusion much less enforcing it. If we can make the distinction for Bull Trout there is no reason we can’t do the same for Searun Cutthroat.

    Direct from the WDFW pamphlet:
    The term TROUT includes: Steelhead, Brown, Cutthroat, Tiger, Rainbow, Lake, Golden, and Eastern Brook, Grayling, Kokanee, Landlocked Atlantic, Coho, and Chinook Salmon.
     
  6. ChrisW

    ChrisW AKA Beadhead

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA.
    I don't think it is a loophole, rather I believe the rule is written FOR Sea Run Cutts. Their "thinking" is that if the limit is 14" and above, cutts will have spawned at least once.

    Chris
     
  7. Mr.E

    Mr.E He called me an Elitist ?? LOL ..what a moron

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    682
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lakewood,Wa.
    Why thank you. :thumb:
     
  8. Go Fish

    Go Fish Language, its a virus

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,483
    Likes Received:
    398
    Location:
    Rheomode, Wa.
    Gearhead, it is refreshing to see that you are also for
    protecting the SRC's of Puget Sound. Thanks for the
    kind words. David
     
  9. gearhead

    gearhead Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Messages:
    670
    Likes Received:
    44
    Location:
    Renton, wa
    I am. I apologize for my less than civil response, but felt it necessary to smoke out elistists and make a point. I have a bad habit of raging against those that think they are better than others, and those that presume the worst of people. I may have unfairly used you to do it. It just rubbed me the wrong way reading the responses to your thread. I respect your staying above it, with your kind response.
    Ed.
     
  10. constructeur

    constructeur Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    2,033
    Likes Received:
    1,248
    Location:
    Commencement Bay,Wa
    Gearhead, that was mighty nice of you to 'smoke out' some of the elite on this website :rofl: I'm all for sharing beer, but you my friend, took it to 11. :thumb:

    In all seriousness people here were only concerned about someone harvesting a protected fish, nothing else. When there are few types of salmon, many bottom fish, shellfish, etc. that are o.k. to harvest from the sea, there's no reason to take a protected fish.
     
  11. Les Johnson

    Les Johnson Les Johnson

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,590
    Likes Received:
    19
    Location:
    .Redmond, WA
    It might be better if we called these great trout Coastal Cutthroat, or Sea-Run Cutthroat rather than SRCs, which somewhat demeans their status in my opinion. Telling some ignorant soul that they've just caught a SRC doesn't sound like such a bad thing to do. We really need to add some $$$$ to the state budget and target it for ennforcement. If we started really coming down on these people, ignorant or knowing poachers, things would get better pretty fast. Another thing is to change the law to make them catch-and-release in rivers as well as the marine environmnet.
    Les Johnson
     
  12. Milt Roe

    Milt Roe Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    445
    Likes Received:
    137
    Location:
    Taco Ma
    More enforcement is badly needed, but that is a very expensive fix and we'll never get enough to cover the need. How about more information posted at the launches, in the kayak stores, and in the tackle shops? I know WFC posted some nice informational flyers at many launches recently covering SRC and bull trout conservation. That's a cheap way to reduce impacts from ignorant anglers, and education about the resource creates more advocates for the resource. In this case, I am pretty sure that a little more education before they hit the water would have made a difference.
     
  13. alpinetrout

    alpinetrout Banned or Parked

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Messages:
    4,164
    Likes Received:
    420
    Location:
    Hiding in your closet
    That's not exactly correct. When fishing with bait, any fish caught, whether kept or released, counts as part of the limit. Therefore, if you fished bait in C&R water, the first fish you caught and released would put you over the limit.
     
  14. Preston

    Preston Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,196
    Likes Received:
    1,687
    Location:
    .
    Just a little background on the catch-and-release regulation for sea-run cutthroat in salt water: Thanks to Les and others, one of the main reasons we were able to get the marine area restriction put into place is because sea-run cutthroat stocks, while in salt water, are mixed. Stocks from a healthy, productive streams may very likely to be mixed with cutthroat populations from a stream or river that is just barely hanging on and a consumptive fishery over these mixed stocks might very well do that stream in; a powerful argument. In the rivers, if additional protection is deemed necessary, there are other options. As mentioned, the 14-inch minimum ensures that any cutthroat caught will, most likely, have spawned at least once.

    Whether we have the data to accurately determine which in-stream populations need additional protection is an entirely different matter. When the WDFW analysis of the health of most of western Washington's sea-run cutthroat populations in the "not determined" category one can only pray for more data and wonder where the money to fund such research will come from.
     
  15. ChrisW

    ChrisW AKA Beadhead

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2004
    Messages:
    493
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Seattle, WA.
    I believe that rule only applies to trout (as in small t trout- not including steelhead) caught in freshwater. But I could be wrong...there is always a first time for everything.

    Not advocating a position just my interpretation of the regs

    iagreeCW