The Ten Commandments at the Courthouse

Discussion in 'Fly Fishing Forum' started by David Holmes, Mar 2, 2005.

  1. David Holmes

    David Holmes Formerly known as "capmblade"

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2004
    Messages:
    598
    Likes Received:
    37
    Location:
    Snoqualmie, WA, USA.
    Home Page:
    Rather than talk about the value the religion, it might be more interesting to talk about the current case before the Supreme Court.

    Should they put the beat-down on the judges who posted the ten-commandments in their courthouses?

    Should the prominent Decaloge display in Texas be torn down?

    You can guess what the New York Times Op-Ed piece (registration required) has to say.

    But consider this: The 1st amendment says that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." AFAIK, no one is making a law mandating that "I am the one true god". This is simply a display. Would banning a display be prohibiting free speech?
     
  2. o mykiss

    o mykiss Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2001
    Messages:
    1,494
    Likes Received:
    398
    Location:
    .
    capmblade, while the words of the 1st amendment may seem to be pretty straightforward, the jurisprudence on the establishment clause is a bit more nuanced than whether someone working for the government is holding a knife to a citizen's throat and telling them to adhere to one particular belief system. I couldn't predict the outcome of this case, but I would not be surprised if the S.Ct. finds that government displays of the 10 commandments do not violate the 1st amendment. After all, Christmas as a government holiday has been challenged under the establishment clause and survived. And by the way, holding that a particular practice by a government agency violates the establishment clause in no way means that someone's first amendment rights are being violated. The establishment clause proscribes government behavior, but the government itself has no free exercise rights - only we as citizens do.
     
  3. BOBLAWLESS

    BOBLAWLESS New Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2002
    Messages:
    2,861
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Port Ludlow, WA, USA.
    Precisely, o mykiss, but here is my read.

    Naturally the government cannot practise a religion and I don't think anyone is accusing them of doing so. The issue is that the government is displaying the Christian/Jewish commandments using public property and monies to do so. This requires the expenditure of taxes and I for one don't want my money heading off in that direction. Religion is for Sunday or Saturday or Friday night but it doesn't have much place in public venues which are supported by all the people, Christian and non-Christian alike.

    Bob the Thing is rather petty and I don't care really. But the principle is very big and I care intensely. :ray1:
     
  4. jessejames

    jessejames Flyslinger

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,938
    Likes Received:
    432
    Location:
    Show Low, Arizona
    I believe that the church and state should be separated which may come as a surprise to some of you. I wont go into the reasons here.
    The problem that face the S/C is that the history of God in government is all around us. God on money. Prayer at the senate and house openings. God, religious symbols, even a statue (bas relief actually) carved in the mural in the Supreme court building itself. The court in the past has determined that these "symbols" don't constitute the formation/practice/promotion of religion in themselves.
    The Texas case is interesting because they are saying it (the 10 commandments) is just one part of an historical exhibit.
    Should be interesting.
    jesse clark
     
  5. dmoocher

    dmoocher Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Olympia, Wa.
    Bob...
    I heard on the radio that the US House or Rep. chaplain who opens each session with a prayer is making a good 6 figure salary...that's a good chunk of our money

    Jesse...you are correct but that doesn't make it right.

    "E Plurabus Unum" was the national phrase up until the "McCarthy" era in the 1950's when "Under God" was added to the pledge of allegiance and "In God we Trust" was added to the money. It coincided precisely with the "Red Scare" a.k.a how the solviet athiests would destroy all non christians...Billy Graham rose to power at this time telling us we would be "Nuked" if we didn't embrace Jesus...Bob probably remembers this...

    1954 was the beginining of the big christian push in the U.S., not 1776. Jesus is nowhere in the Constitution, the Declaration of Independance, or the Bill of Rights.

    Frankly, I don't care if the ten commandments are posted (AS LONG AS BOB AND I ARE NOT PAYING FOR IT) as I wouldn't care if a Bhudda sat on the Whitehouse lawn. Most folks (Christians included) only follow 6 or 7 of them anyway.
     
  6. Craig M

    Craig M Almost Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2003
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bellevue
    It is my understanding that the judge that placed the ten commandments at the courthouse did so with his own money not the publics.
     
  7. BOBLAWLESS

    BOBLAWLESS New Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2002
    Messages:
    2,861
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Port Ludlow, WA, USA.
    Craig M;

    You are a little nit-picky here and missing the point. A publicly funded judge
    used a public building to display his religious beliefs in clear violation of the separation of church and state. Remember that while you have freedom of religion (I'm all for this), I have freedom from religion (something I am not so sure you approve of).

    dmoocher.

    Yes, I remember the McCarthy terrorism well. We lost many civil liberties as a result of that hate monger and I see it all coming back again.
    This pink state-blue state thing is not good. I don't know what to do but I am happy that I can still express some criticism of the Christian movement without a fatwah being placed on my life. I am not sure, though,how much longer such liberty will endure.

    We gotta wet a line one of these days my boy: your writing and intelligence are refreshing on this site and don't worry about making enemies you haven't met. I don't. I don't want to meet them. But I've got to teach you to use a more sophisticated bobber. You see, that one in your avatar is meant for, well, er, uh, um, for CATFISH!; now the polyindicator that I am going to give you will add so much more class to your fishing regalia that even those who don't like your ideas will probably cozy up to you.

    Bob, the Just trying to keep everyone cleaned up nicely. :thumb:
     
  8. dmoocher

    dmoocher Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Olympia, Wa.
    A mess of fried catfish, tater tots and coleslaw...life doesn't get any better!
     
  9. jessejames

    jessejames Flyslinger

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,938
    Likes Received:
    432
    Location:
    Show Low, Arizona
    Bob: your comment to Craig that these monuments are a clear violation of the separation of church and state must not be a fact or the Supreme Court wouldn't be hearing two more cases in this session.
    The high court is meeting to determine the nations position on this issue.
    While we may our personal opinions about the issue the law has yet to be decided. It's the American way.
    I believe freedom of religion and freedom from religion can co exist in the same arena. When I witness something in the public square that offends me I refuse to be involved in it or avert my eyes and mind from it. I don't demand it removal.
    jesse clark
     
  10. Roper

    Roper Idiot Savant

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    5,021
    Likes Received:
    2,238
    Location:
    Glenraven Ranch
    "Article. VII.
    The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.
    done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names, ..."

    It seems the drafters of the Constitution had some belief in the Lord...hmmm, how can we screw with this...?

    So no one says you have to follow the commandments, they are not law, you won't get arrested, so what are you afraid of? If there is no God, there's no consequence, so what does it matter...?
     
  11. Roper

    Roper Idiot Savant

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2004
    Messages:
    5,021
    Likes Received:
    2,238
    Location:
    Glenraven Ranch
    Baked beans, maybe... :confused:
     
  12. Kalm

    Kalm Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cheney, The Dry Side
    Assuming all the supreme court justices as christian, shouldn't they recuse themselves from this case? :rofl:
     
  13. Kalm

    Kalm Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    446
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cheney, The Dry Side
    [/QUOTE]

    If I'm a non christian and the litigation has to do with the topic of religion, I might be skeptical about the fairness of such a court. If a kid murders his abusive father, he might have legitimate concerns when he reads 'honor thy mother and father...' etc.

    If a court, judge, or state's interpretation of the law is not influenced by christianity then yes, what does it matter? why should the commandments be there?
     
  14. jessejames

    jessejames Flyslinger

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,938
    Likes Received:
    432
    Location:
    Show Low, Arizona
    Kalm:
    In the Texas case they are contending it is just a part of other historical displays.
    You better be careful what you say here I found my smiter. :rofl: :rofl:
    jesse careful
     
  15. dmoocher

    dmoocher Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Olympia, Wa.
    Roper...
    You are absolutely correct on both accounts...

    Also...From the Declaration of Independance
    Natures God...not the God of scripture...they were Deists.

    Deists found evidence of God by looking at the world around them, not from a book written my men. The old saying "know the artist by examining the art", not someone elses interpretation of the art.

    ...and lots of bacon, brown sugar and just a touch of chili powder