Up one line? Two?

Discussion in 'Saltwater' started by Jake L, Aug 2, 2008.

  1. Denny

    Denny Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2001
    Messages:
    4,264
    Likes Received:
    93
    Location:
    Seattle, WA, USA.

    Another perspective . . . sometimes it just ain't happening. I don't know about the rest of you, but I certainly have some days that are better than others.
     
  2. Philster

    Philster Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    2,918
    Likes Received:
    325
    Location:
    .
    Let the rod tell you how far you're going to cast any given day, and don't argue with it. You won't win.
     
  3. traditionalist

    traditionalist New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Europe
    Deleted by author
     
  4. Flyborg

    Flyborg Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,387
    Likes Received:
    667
    Location:
    Kalama, WA
    Check out This Tutorial by Mac Lord.
     
  5. Ed Call

    Ed Call Mumbling Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Messages:
    17,942
    Likes Received:
    2,245
    Location:
    Kitsap Peninsula
    Thanks Flyborg, I think that I had stumbled upon a similar practice on my own. This will allow me to refine what I have been doing for sure. Self taught casters sometimes figure out well established casting techniques...but maybe through a lot more trial and error. Anyway, thankg again!
     
  6. jcnewbie

    jcnewbie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kent, Washington
    Yep, was gonna try that too...and kneeling...and sitting in a folding stool...lying on my back...kicked back in a recliner with a cold one, oh wait...,that's afterwards :D!!

    Seriously tho, thanks Philster, I was/am gonna try that...:thumb:

    JC:)
     
  7. jcnewbie

    jcnewbie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kent, Washington
    iagree...so true - and the worse it gets, the worse it gets!!! I've been conscious of the fact that the easier and more effortless it is, the better and farther the cast is...:cool:

    Too hot last night to practice at the park:mad:!

    JC
     
  8. jcnewbie

    jcnewbie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kent, Washington

    I don't wanna admit to that....'cuz that means I'm not in control of my own, uhm, destiny or something like that......:D!

    JC
     
  9. jcnewbie

    jcnewbie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kent, Washington
    That is really, really tough for Type A's ya know? Well okay, more like a B- or C+ now :rofl:!

    JC:rolleyes:
     
  10. Denny

    Denny Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2001
    Messages:
    4,264
    Likes Received:
    93
    Location:
    Seattle, WA, USA.
    Because there needs to be some type of consistent basis, some relative measure.

    I think what you're trying to say is what really matters, without sticking to the numbers as the ultimate guide, is how the rod and the shooting head relate to each other, irrespective of the line weight reference on the rod or the head.

    In the same line weights, even in the same rod models, often each rod will be individual. I remember years ago Stonefish picked up a GLX 8 weight that really seemed more like a 6.5 weight. I had (have) a GLX 8 weight, and the two rods were hugely different. Even though they were both labeled as 8 weights, obviously they would respond differently to the same lines.
     
  11. traditionalist

    traditionalist New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Europe
    Deleted by author
     
  12. jcnewbie

    jcnewbie Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    854
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kent, Washington
    http://www.mike1.bplaced.net/Wikka/RodLoading

    iagree...as if I needed further proof of my imbecilic, moronic math abilities...:rolleyes:

    JC:beathead::beathead:
     
  13. Philster

    Philster Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Messages:
    2,918
    Likes Received:
    325
    Location:
    .
    Your suggestion ignores how the weight is distributed, and the density of the weight matters as well. a lead weight delivers its energy immediately and carris through the air like, well a lead weight. Its profile, drag coefficient, everything remains consistent. An unrolling fly line reacts completely differently especially in the way it accepts and delivers the energy of the cast. Trajectory, air resistance, everything is different. compare a small clouser and a larger deceiver that weigh the same. Cast each of them on a 12 foot leader. The physics are completely different, just as the physics of a lead weight on 8 pound test mono is physically different than a fly line with a running line. A short head vs. an extremely long one makes a huge difference. Look at spey line "ratings" They have different ones for different length lines. Extremely long lines are much heavier than than short heads. Yes spey casting is a different game, but it still relies on the rod storing, and transferring energy to the line. A shorter line will give the sensation of compressing the weight you are throwing and feels as though it's loading the rod more deeply than a longer line of the same weight. I'm not a physicist, but I can tell you from experience that it just does. Some american custom builders are labelling their rods with "grain windows" now in recognition of these issues. Different weight results in different actions, but within a given "action" in the feel of the road, shorter can be lighter, longer can be heavier without significantly affecting the action.

    To find the optimum casting weight for a "shooting head" by far the most direct and efficient approach is to start at the line weight the manufacturer suggests your rod is rated for, and go up two sizes. If this feels too light for a shooting head style cast, go up three. On a 7 start with an AFTMA rated 9 weight 30 foot length of line. If you don't get optimum distance go up to a 10. Now these outbounds and such are a different animal, and theoretically the conversion has been done for you already, although Richard and others seem to feel the airflo is often worthy of uplining one size. I frankly believe Richard when he says that. The Bastard owes me flies, but he can fish... Just kidding Richard, I've been too busy to respond about getting my flies back, what with summer and the kids and all:p

    It seems like your procedure is overthinking the problem. Throw your lead weight, and use that as a starting point to select your line. Unfortunately I see precious few folks fishing who actually know how to cast a spinning rod when I go out, which is a whole other issue. I don't really see a disadvantage to taking the manufacturers opinion of a rod's rating as the starting point for selecting lines. Either way you test cast line and go up or down from there...

    Maye I'm missing something. Perhaps it's something a really "keen" fisherman might do to take more ownership of the process of line selection. Personally I'm taking every bit of help I can get from the manufacturers and people I know and trust. It's easier and cheaper in the long run in my experience.

    Unlike you, I probably do need a translator for what I just spewed out to make sense... But it makes sense to me!:thumb:
     
  14. Denny

    Denny Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2001
    Messages:
    4,264
    Likes Received:
    93
    Location:
    Seattle, WA, USA.
    It appears you do need an interpreter, particularly when you make comments like "The only criteria of any importance when choosing a head are the actual weight and length of the line. What the AFTM rating says is irrelevant."

    That makes no sense at all. That's like saying "It doesn't matter that a liter is a commonly used measure for volume, it's what you actually have that counts!".
     
  15. traditionalist

    traditionalist New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Europe
    Deleted by author