WDFW will not release 'early winter' hatchery steelhead this spring unless legal issues are resolved

Discussion in 'Steelhead' started by Andrew Lawrence, Apr 1, 2014.

  1. Rob Allen

    Rob Allen Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,906
    Likes Received:
    1,915
    Location:
    Vancouver WA



    first of all my wild fish harvest was a compromise a reasonable one however i feel that no one should ever kill another wild steelhead ever even if we hit 1000% of the escapement goal..

    MSY should be thrown entirely out the window we should not expect our rivers to yield anything at all. we should adopt a new management strategy for Maximum Potential Spawning.

    the hatchery steelhead thing was also a compromise I do not believe that we should allow the state or any other agency to be involved in raising hatchery steelhead for planting within our state.

    use all that money and energy to raise salmon for harvest and use steelhead for conservation or northwest heritage. hatchery steelhead are a complete waste of time and resources.. I'd rather have double the hatchery coho.

    my point is that steelhead are not a prolific species like salmon species are so lets put our hatchery harvest efforts where it'll have the highest yield...


    as for escapement goals I think if we doubled them all we'd have a good starting point...
     
    Bob Triggs likes this.
  2. Rob Allen

    Rob Allen Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,906
    Likes Received:
    1,915
    Location:
    Vancouver WA


    no just 30 years of listening to Biologists and kicking around the block and being acquainted with the history of the northwest and what it used to produce. and I have high expectations of what our rivers are still capable if they were allowed to.

    also education gives you knowledge.. it doesn't make you smart or able to think.. Now i don't claim to be smart but i can usually see through governmental BS.

    that is why i suggest that people wanting to make a difference get the education they say you have to have then get inside WDFW and work your way up.. I can think of one such individual right now. Who i think is on the right track...
     
  3. Chris Johnson

    Chris Johnson Member: Native Fish Society

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    Messages:
    3,086
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    Location:
    Bellingham Wa.
    Curt, I proposed special regs (no bait barbless hook), in the north fork Nooksack above Welcome bridge for that very reason, to protect the resident trout population and steelhead and salmon pre migrants. The WDFW told me they were already doing enough to protect those fish and did not want to limit harvest opportunity.
     
  4. dmas

    dmas New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2011
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    ny
    There really should be no harvest of native trout or char anywhere on the continent as far as I am concerned, at least in areas that receive any degree of fishing pressure, and particularly in the case of resident fish. Political and social pressures aside, we really need to rethink these harvest fisheries and focus on the selective harvest of salmon as a regional resource, a resource that effectively harnesses the productivity of the ocean and brings it to us. Trout and char should be categorized as non-harvestable sport fish for the simple reason that sustainable healthy populations are more valuable from an economic stand point in this capacity. Not to mention the importance that they hold in any healthy functioning watershed, probably some of which we still don’t fully understand. To me this seems to be one of the rare instances where Lichatowich’s natural economy and our economy might find some common ground.
     
    sopflyfisher and Chris Johnson like this.
  5. freestoneangler

    freestoneangler Not to be confused with Freestone

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    7,800
    Likes Received:
    2,730
    Location:
    Ruby Valley, MT
    Fascinating... this forum is a lot like watching a dog chase its tail. One statement I've made before that cannot be disputed is; choosing not to fish over threatened stock introduces no risk whatsoever...and that is a personal choice each of us can make. Those that try and split hairs making arguments to the contrary are simply trying to justify the internal guilt they have knowing they are putting personal gratification in the wrong priority.

    We can argue the hypotheses, mounds of conflicting data, suppositions, theories, opinions, and what ifs till the rivers run dry -- but nothing changes the fact that fishing them introduces risk. And, just because this is a fishing forum, does not mean the position not to fish them (threatened stock) should be disregarded.

    And I still think steelhead are overrated ;).
     
  6. KerryS

    KerryS Ignored Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2001
    Messages:
    8,437
    Likes Received:
    4,409
    Location:
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    I forgot to add the sarcasm smiley to my post and apparently you were unable to recognize that. Oh well.

    I suffer from three terminal diseases all in a race to see which one will kill me first. I won't be around when you catch the last one but I will do what I can while I am here to help make sure one is left for you to catch.
     
  7. _WW_

    _WW_ Geriatric Skagit Swinger

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,056
    Likes Received:
    2,156
    Location:
    Skagit River
    Rob, just when you start to make a little sense you type this comment:
    If you want to come off sounding like a zealot, that is your business. But do not expect to be taken seriously.

    Maybe I'm a little tired, I've only had one day off in the last three weeks, but it appears to me that you are NOT listening to two biologists in this very thread.

    I think part of the problem here is that your reference is the Washougal, while mine is the Skagit. Both Salmo and Curt have years of boots on the ground science up here on the Skagit/Sauk and...well...the escapement numbers speak for themselves.

    Earlier you posted something about sub sub sub basin management, (more zealot talk). Good luck with that! We can't even get them to do the paper work for a single basin management plan for the Skagit when we show up with scientific data, records, and scientists themselves giving the testimony!

    But maybe your tactic will work. Try showing up all wild eyed and talking about no fishing year round, (cause steelhead are present year round) even with 1000% escapement, sub sub sub basin management plans, and make sure to yell a lot while you're doing it - they like that.

    And while you are there, maybe you can get an answer from them where I couldn't. Not from the commissioners, the director, Jim Scott, Bob Turner at NOAA, the Upper Skagit Tribe, or anyone else connected to fish management in any capacity...How does not fishing the robust run on the Skagit help the other streams in Puget Sound recover? Simple question - nobody can answer it. Maybe you can take a crack at it.

    Personally, I don't give a rat's ass whether you guys ever fish again. If that's what makes you happy, then don't fucking fish! Stay home and feel good, knock yourself out, burn your fishing shit and throw a NOT FISHING PARTY and invite all your friends.
     
    doublespey and jake-e-boy like this.
  8. Rob Allen

    Rob Allen Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,906
    Likes Received:
    1,915
    Location:
    Vancouver WA

    i clearly said that i had no problem with a cnr fishery on the Skagit however the Skagit is not the only steelhead river on the planet not is it the only one in Washington state not the only one in Puget Sound Now can we take that one river out of the argument???... i would however oppose any catch and kill fishery on any river regardless of it's escapement.

    if we are not willing to save small creeks we are by definition not willing to save large rivers. you cannot separate the two...


    Some rivers can support catch and release fisheries however not all of them can. it's very easy to understand

    time to put this thread out of it's misery.... fighting over very small details does not accomplish anything for any of us...
     
  9. jake-e-boy

    jake-e-boy sans caféine

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    1,476
    Likes Received:
    878
    posting on this sub does not accomplish much either
     
    golfman44 likes this.
  10. Lugan

    Lugan Joe Streamer

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Messages:
    4,272
    Likes Received:
    3,705
    Location:
    Beautiful View, WA
    Is this the right place for me to ask if nymphing for steelhead is a valid fishing technique?
     
    the_chemist likes this.
  11. _WW_

    _WW_ Geriatric Skagit Swinger

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,056
    Likes Received:
    2,156
    Location:
    Skagit River
    Only if you use beads instead of splitshot.
     
    David Dalan and Lugan like this.
  12. bennysbuddy

    bennysbuddy the sultan of swing

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2010
    Messages:
    5,235
    Likes Received:
    3,197
    Location:
    m-ville
    I commend your efforts,there seems to be a lot of talk and very little action ,where steelhead are concerned !
     
  13. Ed Call

    Ed Call Mumbling Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Messages:
    19,620
    Likes Received:
    4,624
    Location:
    Kitsap Peninsula
    You get to decide what contribution or contradiction to add to a thread. Let those assigned decide when or if a thread gets put out of its misery. I so enjoy it when others imply, suggest or outright state what others should be doing. Much like this thread of doing things my way or not at all. Hilarious.
     
  14. Rob Allen

    Rob Allen Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,906
    Likes Received:
    1,915
    Location:
    Vancouver WA
    a guy can't even make a suggestion that a debate be dropped in furtherance of unity on the board... great!

    no matter what I say half the board jumps down my throat...
     
  15. David Dalan

    David Dalan 69°19'15.35" N 18°44'22.74" E

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2007
    Messages:
    2,631
    Likes Received:
    1,324
    Location:
    Walla Walla, WA

    Ditching MSY and doubling escapement goals (which I think could only exist hand in hand) would indeed be cool.