Wolves on the Westside?

Discussion in 'Fly Fishing Forum' started by scottr, Aug 19, 2012.

  1. ribka

    ribka Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,897
    Likes Received:
    744
    Location:
    E WA
    You're wasting your time. Now if we could get some pike minnow, seal, cormorant, northern pike and smallmouth hatcheries in this state that would make fishing for tout, salmon and steelhead more interesting and challenging.

     
  2. Alex MacDonald

    Alex MacDonald that's His Lordship, to you.....

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2008
    Messages:
    5,077
    Likes Received:
    2,438
    Location:
    Haus Alpenrosa, Lederhosenland
    Looks like I'll need to upgrade the .40 to the .243
     
  3. plecoptera419

    plecoptera419 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2012
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    258
    Location:
    Mount Vernon, WA
    Do I detect a hint of sarcasm here? ;)

    Somebody please convince WDFW that there should be a bounty on bullfrogs. I could almost make a living at frog gigging.
     
  4. ribka

    ribka Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2005
    Messages:
    1,897
    Likes Received:
    744
    Location:
    E WA
    Wolf meat borsch is considered a delicacy in Russia. Their coats make for very warm and functional winter head gear. I wear mine skiing all the time at snowqualmie and MT Hood.
     
    TallFlyGuy likes this.
  5. Brett Angel

    Brett Angel Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    604
    Likes Received:
    76
    Location:
    Sammamish, WA
    Like putting hatchery steelhead in the rivers to please a particular group and ignoring another?

    I should add I do not believe the only good wolf is a dead wolf, but can understand the concerns of ranchers and the like.
     
  6. scottr

    scottr Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    461
    Likes Received:
    130
    Location:
    Chasing trout and birds
    Why is it a long shot when these animals can travel dozens of miles a day and there is a large pack just over the crest of the cascades? The state has confirmed 8 packs (mind you this has just happened in the last four years) and officially acknowledge that there there may be up to 5 more packs in the state. I'd say it is a much of long shot as Grizzlies in the North Cascades.

    BTW I don't disagree with this sentiment. I am certainly not in the see it shoot it crowd but do think that they need to be managed like all other wildlife.
     
  7. Gatorator

    Gatorator Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2008
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Pend Oreille Valley, Idaho
    Sorta like planting Northern Pike in your favorite trout stream and then telling you that you will go to jail if you catch one.
     
    TallFlyGuy likes this.
  8. Trustfunder

    Trustfunder Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    69
    Location:
    rock creek
    Imagine the analogies in fly fishing, and you can see how ridiculous it is.

    Well we should ban fishing from all waters to "restore the natural balance of things" it seems we've had a detrimental effect of making salmon more spooky for bears, trout more wary for eagles and otters.

    It's difficult to explain to non-hunters but if you rented your fancy vacation home out to a bunch of crack heads for 15 years unchecked, what condition do you think your home would be in? That pretty much sums up to what the wolves have done to public lands in W. Montana. Now we're going to do some cleaning.
     
  9. Richard Olmstead

    Richard Olmstead BigDog

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    1,733
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    This is a factually inaccurate assessment of the wolf reintroduction effort. There was nothing "altruistic" about wolf reintroduction. A tremendous amount of input was received from ALL stakeholders (including ranchers and hunters) before reintroduction was begun, and plans were in place for mitigation for prospective financial losses to ranchers before reintroduction began. In any event, I believe the wolves in Washington are not the descendants of wolves reintroduced into Yellowstone and Idaho, but rather are natural migrants from Canada. They are managed as a protected species under laws that are generally viewed as important for management of our natural resources.

    D
     
    flybill and Bill Aubrey like this.
  10. fly-by

    fly-by Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    36
    Location:
    Tangled in the Pines
    Dick- You are correct about the origin of the WA wolves, at least the Lookout/Teanaway packs. They have been linked genetically to the coastal BC wolf population. The coastal BC wolves are a little smaller than those from the Rockies and some of them have actually adapted to eat salmon. This is a good book about them:
    http://www.amazon.com/The-Last-Wild-Wolves-Ghosts/dp/0520254732
     
  11. Jeff Sawyer

    Jeff Sawyer Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    657
    Likes Received:
    619
    Location:
    Tacoma WA
    I think you're OK as long as you don't wear a red hooded cape.
     
  12. Kent Lufkin

    Kent Lufkin Remember when you could remember everything?

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2004
    Messages:
    7,183
    Likes Received:
    1,295
    Location:
    Not sure
    Somehow wolves and elk managed to co-exist for hundreds of thousands of years before the heavy hand of man began to 'improve' things. Our appreciation of their delicate interrelationship is still not fully understood. In nearly all of mankind's efforts to 'manage' the natural order to our own ends, our understanding of the interconnectedness of species and their environment is limited as is our ability to understand how bad outcomes can be a direct result our actions. When we simplistically 'manage' a natural resource like wolves without a clear and full understanding of the consequences, we risk creating other problems that may indeed be greater than the ones we were attempting to solve.

    I get that hunters kill elk and that more elk means easier hunting. I also understand that elk hunters are willing to influence greater numbers of elk and thus contribute their time and money to that end. But the problem with 'conservation' efforts devoted to benefiting a single species is that the goal produces a limited and simplistic result: in this case, an increase in the number of elk. Yet such efforts almost always come with unintended adverse consequences.

    As a slightly oversimplified example, when wolves were eradicated from the Yellowstone basin, the immediate consequence was a dramatic increase in elk populations with the elimination of their apex predator. Not a bad outcome if you're an elk hunter.

    But the unintended consequence was that since elk tend to prefer tender young shoots from alders, aspens and other trees and bushes, their increasing numbers quickly wiped out young trees resulting in large swaths of dead tree trunks and branches. Since live tree roots retain water, their loss meant increased soil erosion during rains and runoff, washing away the thin layer of topsoil and vastly reducing the chances that any plants would ever grow in those areas again. The dried, dead trunks and limbs of elk-killed trees and brush became fuel for lightning-sparked wildfires.

    If your goal is to have large herds of elk available for an easy kill every fall and you see wolves as standing between you and that end, then landslides, decimated forests and fires might be a small price to pay, right?

    K
     
  13. fly-by

    fly-by Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2006
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    36
    Location:
    Tangled in the Pines
    Bill Aubrey likes this.
  14. 206FLYFISHER

    206FLYFISHER Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    119
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    out there
    The problem here is not the sport of hunting. The real issue is the invention of the gun. Guns made the taking of prey (or life) much easier than mankind has ever experienced in nature. Hunters have no respect for the animals they take or the environment in which they live. I say this because anyone can shoot an elk 500 yards away without having to break a sweat. All they care about is the KILL. If a hunter has to compete with another predator they want to eliminate the competition. When real hunters had nothing to use but their brain to hunt, they came up with very clever ways to catch prey: the bow and arrow, spears, hell even poisonous blow darts. More importantly you had to have a certain level of respect for nature otherwise you simply did not eat. If hunters are so good at their craft then why do they not exclusively use bows? Any moron can shoot something dead; it does not take a genius to aim and fire a rifle. But it would be too much work having to track, give chase, and catch your prey if you catch anything at all. Hell every person I have meet who hunts looks like they would get winded just having to walk to their mail box. Same comparison as fly vs gear anglers. Any moron can chuck gear and effortlessly catch fish. I've gone years fly-fishing and haven't even begun to scratch the surface. Don't get me wrong I have nothing against hunting. I have even thought about taking it up. Just if I take it up I will use a bow and keep a .44 in case I run into a bear or wolf. jmho
     
    dryflylarry likes this.
  15. Trustfunder

    Trustfunder Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2008
    Messages:
    203
    Likes Received:
    69
    Location:
    rock creek
    Agree to most of what your saying but...a natural migration of wolves is one thing a forced re-introduction is another, especially when it was largely financed by the Pittman-Robertsen act. Where hunters have been the top 3 supporters of this tax for over 70 years. I haven't tried wolf yet, but I imagine it's pretty hard to choke down.

    Secondly, the YNP experiment resulted in the highest concentration of wolves in the world for a 2 million acre range... mainly to tackle (the weak and starving) worlds largest free roaming elk herd. They were very successful and apparently most of the elk were weak and starving because it took down a herd measuring 20K+ to less than 4K today. Now it that happened to your salmon, steelhead, trout stream I think you'd be pissed.

    Thirdly, please try and burn a dead aspen tree and tell me how that works out for you. The pine bettle has done more damage to erosion in forested areas than any ungulate ever will.

    The day I see a "wolf wintering range" financed by wolf lovers is the day I will start drinking your water.
     
    Jim Ficklin likes this.