Would you stop fishing? (Steelhead)

Discussion in 'Steelhead' started by Panhandle, Feb 6, 2008.

  1. Panhandle

    Panhandle Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    4,141
    Likes Received:
    80
    Location:
    Selkirk Mountains, Idaho Panhandle
    Hypothetical question here with certain intent:

    If saving native steelhead meant closing down all river systems for 20 years, would you be willing to make that sacrifice? Look at it in terms of no steelhead fishing what so ever, not even for brats.

    I ask this, because we often talk about making sacrifices for the better good, but we're also human, as well as selfish steelhead junkies. I would be interested in getting honest answers. It would be a very tough one for me. I support hatchery programs because of my selfishness, but also know that this selfishness is detrimental to native fish health. So.....
     
  2. fatguide

    fatguide fish or DIE

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Corvallis, Montana
    Pan;

    I feel like you just punched me in the stones, I'm going to have to think about this one.

    Great soul-searching question Adam.
     
  3. LD

    LD Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    1,182
    Likes Received:
    136
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    Yes with a few if's,
    - stop gill netting
    - have the government team up with some outside interests to make sure things are going the right direction.
    - better enforcement, I so not want to stop so poachers have more fish.

    Also do not think that it would take 20 yrs if the got with the program.
     
  4. Tyler Sadowski

    Tyler Sadowski Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    35
    Location:
    Kirkland, wa
    i would stop fishing. it would suck but if it meant that one day i could fish for a healthy run of natives or if my kids could fish for them it would be all worth it. hopefully it never comes to that but somethings got to be done.
     
  5. chadk

    chadk Be the guide...

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    5,057
    Likes Received:
    43
    Location:
    Snohomish, WA.
    In a heart beat. But then I'm only in my mid 30s so I should be around to see the opening and I'd be happy to wait.

    Some assumptions:
    * salmon, trout, and other fishing wouldn't be directly impacted
    * this is part a multi-faceted aproach that includes: working with the tribes on netting, closing down the sale and export of all wild steelhead from WA, habitat focus, fish passage issues, no hatchery steelhead unless part of rebuilding wild fish brood stock program.
     
  6. Steven Hendrickson

    Steven Hendrickson Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2007
    Messages:
    130
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    bellingham washington
    Yes but I dont think 20 years would be the right amount of time maybe 3-5 years. Thats just my uneducated opinion.
     
  7. PT

    PT Physhicist

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,927
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Location:
    Edmonds, WA
    No. I'd move.
     
  8. Ryan Nathe

    Ryan Nathe Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Messages:
    836
    Likes Received:
    9
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I would stop fishing for them if it mean't that natives recovered.
     
  9. rick matney

    rick matney Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,297
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Bozeman, Montana
    No. but I could cut back if the powers at be would support my saltwater addiction. Just saying i'm selfish and we have already fubared it up so bad already 20 years wouldn't do it in my opinion.
     
  10. PETI

    PETI Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2002
    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    23
    Location:
    Battle Ground, WA
    Did it on the East Coast for stripers with good results, would here also. The beauty with rivers is you could shut half down and fish the other half filled with brats.
    My bet is the me/mines would nix it and rather fish them to extinction.

    Peter
     
  11. SeaRun Fanatic

    SeaRun Fanatic Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2005
    Messages:
    455
    Likes Received:
    42
    Location:
    Northwest, WA
    Would said rivers be closed to ALL FISHING during this period? Seems like the only way to reach the desired goal without waaaaay to much wiggle room. And is there data to say that taking such action would be significantly more effective than a 100% C&R ruling for the rivers in question?
     
  12. Freestone

    Freestone Not to be confused with freestoneangler

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    Messages:
    3,749
    Likes Received:
    4,783
    Location:
    Central WA
    Yes, for as long as it would take if it contributed to rebuilding healthy, self-sustaining populations. Sure, there are plenty of other things that also need to be done but if this is how I could help save even a few fish, I'd do it in a heartbeat. The fact that other user groups need to make changes too doesn’t mean I have to wait for them to do their part before I do mine.
     
  13. Tim Cottage

    Tim Cottage Formerly tbc1415

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Messages:
    2,162
    Likes Received:
    698
    Location:
    Outer Duvall
    Yes. I have already done just that. I was an avid steelheader longer than many of this boards members have been fishing let alone flyfishing. I could no longer justify contributing to the decline of native fish just because it gives me pleasure to catch them.
    I was not going to wait until so and so did such and such. The buck stops here not over there.

    TC
     
  14. Sageman

    Sageman Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Yakima, WA
    I'd hate to see it close down for that length of time. I've always wondered about a rotating system where you divide the steelhead rivers up into 3 groups and then rotate them on a 3 year schedule. Open for 3, closed for 3, etc. Problem is that it would drastically increase the pressure on the ones that were open.

    I also would not at all hesitate to agree to buy a $200 (or more) enhancement endorsement, assuming the money actually went to enhancement. Heck, I'd pay $1000 if it would improve the fishing.
     
  15. TomB

    TomB Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2004
    Messages:
    1,643
    Likes Received:
    91
    Location:
    seattle,wa
    Yes. I would then direct all of the time I would have spent fishing over the next 20 years toward raising hell with managers, comanagers, and the feds to ensure that other harmful practices were stopped.