Presumed gone, wild Atlantic Salmon return to the Connecticut River!

rapido101

Kicked
by Nate Schweber

Biologists discover first spawning salmon since the Revolutionary War.

By the fall of 2015, the salmon of the Connecticut River were supposed to be doomed. The silvery fish that once swam the Northeast’s longest river, 407 miles from the mountains of New Hampshire to Long Island Sound, went extinct because of dams and industrial pollution in the 1700s that turned the river deadly. In the late 1800s a nascent salmon stocking program failed. Then in 2012, despite nearly a half-century of work and an investment of $25 million, the federal government and three New England states pulled the plug on another attempt to resurrect the prized fish.

But five Atlantic salmon didn’t get the memo. In November, fisheries biologists found something in the waters of the Farmington River — which pours into the Connecticut River — that historians say had not appeared since the Revolutionary War: three salmon nests full of eggs.

“It’s a great story,” said John Burrows, of the Atlantic Salmon Federation, a conservation group, “whether it’s the beginning of something great or the beginning of the end.”

The quest to resurrect Atlantic salmon in the Connecticut River began anew in the mid-1960s when the federal government and New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts and Connecticut joined forces. They worked to curb pollution in their shared river and also build passageways around some of the 2,500 dams that plugged the river and its feeder streams in the 11,250-square-mile Connecticut River watershed.

The streamlined wild Atlantic salmon, genetically different from their fattened domesticated counterparts, which are mass-produced for human consumption, are so rare that anglers spend small fortunes chasing them across Canada, Iceland and Russia. Robert J. Behnke, the preeminent salmon biologist of the 20th century, wrote that Salmo salar (Latin for “leaping salmon”) has inspired in people “an emotional, almost mystical attachment to a species they regard as a magnificent creation of nature.”

Through the Connecticut River restoration program, a few thousand 2-year-old Atlantic salmon raised in a fish hatchery were stocked in the river in 1967. But they all soon died or swam out to sea and never returned. Program leaders knew they needed to survive not just for the sake of the species, but also to get the public to support the program. Before European colonization, biologists estimate, the Connecticut River teemed with annual runs of 50,000 Atlantic salmon, the most in North America. But, as the Boston Globe noted, “the fish had been gone so long there weren’t even great-grandparents who remembered them.” Kenneth Sprankle, a coordinator with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, wrote that the salmon lost their “level of relevance.”

All the stocked salmon continued to die off through the early 1970s. Gradually, scientists began to learn the importance of different strains of salmon and their close relatives, trout. In 1976 the program was able to acquire Atlantic salmon eggs from the Penobscot River in Maine, the closest surviving population both physically and genetically. This strain was still different from the lost native strain of the Connecticut River, but less so than their Canadian cousins, previously stocked there. In 1978, 90 fish from the Maine strain managed to make the two-year, 6,000-mile migration out to the food-rich Labrador Sea off of Greenland and then return to the Connecticut River.

In 1981, more than 500 salmon returned — the most yet. Biologists hoped they were on the verge of re-creating one of the most fragile, complicated and increasingly rare natural phenomena on earth, a long-distance animal migration.

By the mid 1990s, all of the salmon that found their way back to the Connecticut River were caught and bred at the Richard Cronin National Salmon Station, a fish hatchery in Sunderland, Massachusetts. Their eggs were then incubated at the White River National Fish Hatchery in Vermont. The biologists wanted to use a technique known as reproductive isolation, commonly known as inbreeding, to redevelop a strain of salmon that followed genetic commands to migrate out from and back to the Connecticut River, a facsimile of what nature had done a million years earlier. Stephen Gephard, senior fisheries biologist for the state of Connecticut, compared the process to dog breeding.

“If you want a dog that jumps in the water, keep breeding ones that do and eventually you’ll have a Labrador retriever,” he said.

The other part of salmon migration, biologists learned, is trained behavior. Salmon remember the isotopes and chemical elements of the waters where they live as juveniles so they can return as adults. Biologists then began stocking Connecticut River waters with the youngest salmon they could in order to give them the maximum environmental imprint.

“We knew we were never going to do as well as Mother Nature,” Gephard said. “But that’s what we were trying to do.”

By combining reproductive isolation with early imprinting, the scientists increased the rate of salmon returns tenfold from the beginning of the program. One U.S. Fish and Wildlife biologist boasted in the early 1990s that they had achieved a “miracle recovery.”

But then wild Atlantic salmon around the world began to die off. So did cod, lobster and winter flounder. Scientists found that capelin, a small fish that salmon feed on in the Labrador Sea, had on average become significantly smaller in size in just a few decades, suggesting that salmon were not finding the calories they needed to survive their migrations.

By turn of the 21st century, cycles of ocean currents that had historically made fish populations fluctuate grew erratic and unpredictable. More ominously, researchers found that while much of the Atlantic Ocean had gone up in temperature, around Greenland the water had turned both colder and less saline — symptoms consistent with the theory that the ocean was changing because of global warming.

“Things are really variable now,” said John Kocik, a fishery biologist for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.




src.adapt.960.high.salmon_hatchery_0222.1456252588628.jpg

Mickey Novack, hatchery manager at Cronin National Salmon Station, with a female Atlantic salmon that returned to the Connecticut River in the spring, now in a giant hold until the fall.
Joanne Rathe / The Boston Globe / Getty Images
In 2001, only 40 Atlantic salmon returned to the Connecticut River. The next year there were 44. The George W. Bush administration cut the budget of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and some Atlantic salmon restoration proponents began to question whether the anemic returns justified the annual cost of around $2 million — tens of thousands per fish. Meanwhile, the general public mostly ignored the program, because the salmon had not yet returned in large enough numbers to be seen or caught.

What happened next, Gephard said, was “a perfect storm.”
Hurricane Irene, its gale winds pulling extra energy from the warmed waters of the mid-Atlantic, wrecked the White River National Fish Hatchery in Vermont in August 2011. The damage to the facility, where 65 percent of all Connecticut River Atlantic salmon eggs were raised, was estimated at as much as $14 million.

As only 54 salmon returned to the Connecticut River in 2012, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service pulled out of the restoration program. New Hampshire, Vermont and Massachusetts followed. Connecticut opted to continue stocking a small number of salmon, but it lacks the resources to continue the breeding program, which had made such progress.

While the restoration program failed for salmon, it boosted a suite of other species. American shad, gizzard shad, sea lamprey, striped bass, sea-run brown trout, white perch, alewives, yellow lamp mussels and endangered American eels in the Connecticut River all jumped in population.

Then in the fall of 2015, biologists found five adult Atlantic salmon swimming past the Rainbow Dam on the lower Farmington River. On a hunch, they searched likely upstream spawning habitat and there found the three nests full of eggs. In the spring of 2016 they will hatch the first wild salmon into that river in two centuries. (In 1991 a few salmon spawned for the first time in centuries in Connecticut’s nearby Salmon River.)

The phenomenon was so extraordinary that the nest’s location was kept a tight secret. Some local fishermen refuse to even speak about them for fear attention might do them harm, and some state officials even opted for plausible deniability.

“I don’t know where they are, and I really don’t want to know,” said Neal Hagstrom, inland fisheries biologist for the state of Connecticut. “Sometimes it’s better that way.”




image.adapt.990.high.salmon_ct_river_0222.1456252588628.jpg

A Connecticut Fish and Wildlife Facebook post reads, “This past November, Inland Fisheries biologists discovered three redds [where trout or salmon lay their eggs] made by wild returning Atlantic salmon. This marks the first documented wild spawning of Atlantic salmon in Connecticut since 1991.”
Connecticut Fish and Wildlife
A tight-cropped photo of one of the nests posted in December to a state Facebook page triggered a storm of its own. The photo went viral and became the most shared piece of news in the history of the wildlife department, Gephard said. Email listserves for scientists and message boards for fishermen lit up, said Kocik, who works in Maine. Soon Gephard was fielding questions about the salmon from local, regional and national media.

The attention suggests there might yet be another effort to restore wild Atlantic salmon to the Connecticut River, despite the odds.

“It’s a romantic species, it’s charismatic, it just captures our attention,” Gephard said. “It’s this kind of attention that got the restoration program going in the first place.”
 

jeff bandy

Make my day
Wonder what would have happened if they had just left them to spawn in the river naturally.

They talk about how great their breeding program was working, tell it stopped working. Maybe that selective breeding wasn't such a great idea.

It wouldn't have cost them anything to just leave the fish alone and let nature take it's course.

Maybe someone will think of that with this new opportunity. Somehow I doubt it.
 

Alosa

Active Member
I wouldn't consider a flash in the pan spawning event a sustained recovery for Atlantic salmon. Show me consistent spawning over an extended period of time and increased abundances and then I'll be more convinced.
 

rapido101

Kicked
I wouldn't consider a flash in the pan spawning event a sustained recovery for Atlantic salmon. Show me consistent spawning over an extended period of time and increased abundances and then I'll be more convinced.
Maybe and maybe not. But isn't some apolitical potentially good news a welcome change?
 

jeff bandy

Make my day
It's the ones that make it through the hardest of conditions that will save this run. Not a bunch of pampered hatchery brats.

They should just leave them be. Let nature take care of selecting the fittest.

If the states have done enough to rehab the watershed, the fish will do the rest.

Or they won't. But give them a chance.
 

madmike98

Aww sh!t
They should've just put armed guards around the reds to keep anybody from screwing with them and left the fish wild
 

dustinchromers

Active Member
It's the ones that make it through the hardest of conditions that will save this run. Not a bunch of pampered hatchery brats.

They should just leave them be. Let nature take care of selecting the fittest.

If the states have done enough to rehab the watershed, the fish will do the rest.

Or they won't. But give them a chance.

I agree. The human involved recovery didn't work before and these things came back on their own so I'd tend to protect them and leave them be.
 

Matt B

...
WFF Supporter
Maybe and maybe not. But isn't some apolitical potentially good news a welcome change?
It's a great story but you're starting to monopolize this subforum which is getting annoying and the Connecticut River is pretty far removed from a Washington fly fishing conservation related topic.
 

Gyrfalcon21

Honoring Vets
NOT ALOT of successful conservation/preservation truly happening in WA State, yet.

Northwest fish stocks are on hospice.

Anytime, anywhere, anyone is looking to preserve or restore anything in nature is a good read in my book.
 
Last edited:

cabezon

Sculpin Enterprises
WFF Supporter
If you don't learn about failures, you are doomed to repeat them.... What this article highlights is that a species whose abundance is extremely low is tremendously vulnerable to natural variability and how centralized technological solutions (e.g., hatcheries) are invariably going to suffer crises at some point regardless of the best of intentions. If you put all your eggs (literally and figuratively) in a limited number of technology-driven solutions, they will suffer a breakdown through unanticipated or unavoidable failures. Long-term solutions to recovery would be better sustained by dispersed solutions that are less dependent on technology and therefore more resilient.
Steve
 
Last edited:

Viper97

Active Member
I've always said nature has a way of healing itself. Homo Sapiens however still think they are smarter than nature. So far... we're batting zero in my mind.
 

Salmo_g

WFF Supporter
Thanks for posting! I've had an eye on Connecticut salmon restoration since a friend first told me about it in 1979. I think those experiences are highly relevant to the PNW. Hardly anyone here thought we'd be dealing with disappearing salmon populations in the NW, yet here we are with over two dozen ESA listings. The methods tried in the NE, and how they succeeded or failed, informed the choices for the rescue hatcheries here locally: the Hood Canal summer chum salmon and Hood Canal steelhead.

Lack of an indigenous salmon stock is one serious problem with Connecticut salmon restoration, but lack of effective fish passage systems is the greater obstacle, IMO. You can have the perfect local wild stock and or the perfect hatchery stock, but if the numerous fishways - and there are many - don't provide safe, timely, and effective upstream and downstream passage, then restoration is impossible. I'm biased. I've done a lot of work with fish passage, enough to know that most systems are woefully inadequate.

Sg
 

Support WFF | Remove the Ads

Support WFF by upgrading your account. Site supporters benefits include no ads and access to some additional features, few now, more in the works. Info
Top