What Weight And Length Rod For Nymph Fishing?

SMSNYDER

SMSNYDER
I been thinking about buying a 10 foot nymph rod. Maybe 3 or 4 weight. What weight and length Nymph rods are you guys using for trout? What is your experience?
 

freestoneangler

Not to be confused with Freestone
I use a GL2 904-2 and a RPL 690-2 for the majority of my streamer fishing. That 4 wt fishes more like a 5 wt. It really depends on what type water you will be fishing. I've used my RPL+ 796-2 for big, heavy water, but find that a bit too over-gunned for most waters.
 

SMSNYDER

SMSNYDER
Thanks I was just wondering if the 10 footer makes a huge difference over a 9 footer when nymphing. I am looking at the sage esn or the new orvis 10 foot 3 weight recon.
 

Kyle Smith

Active Member
If you are doing a lot of short line nymphing, the 3100 or 4100 would be awesome. If you do bobbers, a 10' 4, 5, or 6 would be better, depending on river size and wind. My nymph rods are 10' 3 and 4wt for places like the Gallatin, then a 9'6" 6wt and 7wt for big water bobber fishing.
 

freestoneangler

Not to be confused with Freestone
Thanks I was just wondering if the 10 footer makes a huge difference over a 9 footer when nymphing. I am looking at the sage esn or the new orvis 10 foot 3 weight recon.
The longer length can be handy for line mending; particularly on bigger water. But, were that a really significant advantage, the vast majority of rods wouldn't be 9 ft... just saying.
 

freestoneangler

Not to be confused with Freestone
I get the feeling he wants to do Czech etc nymphing, not so mendy but you hold all your line off the water.
Those silly Czech's... I just find a really large rock, and preferably one mid-channel. That way I can use my 9 foot rod and cover bank to bank whilst keeping the line off the water :D.
 

freestoneangler

Not to be confused with Freestone
The GL2 and RPL rods I mentioned are med/fast action, the RPL+ fast. I use first two rods as much for small top water fishing as for nymphing and they work fine for both applications. I find rods having in the med/fast action to my liking. It seems many of the hard core streamer folks like a bit more butt end backbone to aid in lifting sinking or sink tip line and the drowned chicken's.
 
Last edited:

SMSNYDER

SMSNYDER
I have a 9 foot Hardy Zenith. Its seems to be a fast rod. I also have a G Loomis NRX Light Presentation. It is more like a mediun action. Which one would you use to nymph with or without an indicator?
 

freestoneangler

Not to be confused with Freestone
I have a 9 foot Hardy Zenith. Its seems to be a fast rod. I also have a G Loomis NRX Light Presentation. It is more like a mediun action. Which one would you use to nymph with or without an indicator?
Try both. I suspect both would work just fine... with or w/o a bobber. ;)
 

SMSNYDER

SMSNYDER
NO NO its not a bobber when your fly fishing . That's for worm fisherman. In fly fishing its called and indicator. LOL
 

Penobscot

Active Member
I have a 9 foot Hardy Zenith. Its seems to be a fast rod. I also have a G Loomis NRX Light Presentation. It is more like a mediun action. Which one would you use to nymph with or without an indicator?

I have both, both will work. In my opinion, the Hardy is a better Nymph and Streamer Rod, and the NRX LP is a better Dry rod.

Both are really sweet rods.
 

Kyle Smith

Active Member
Just from wiggling one at Cabela's, the ESN 3100 would be a lot of fun. I once had a Greys Stream flex 10' 3wt and now have a Redington Hydrogen 3100. Of you haven't played with these Euro rods, you must know that they aren't really a 3wt. They fight a line weight bigger.
 

Support WFF | Remove the Ads

Support WFF by upgrading your account. Site supporters benefits include no ads and access to some additional features, few now, more in the works. Info

Latest posts

Top