Felt Sole Bans

#1
Road tripping anytime soon? Felt soles are now banned in Alaska, Maryland, Vermont, Rhode Island (fresh and salt) and Missouri.
Rhode Island Bans Felt Soles

Posted on 12/28/2011 by admin
From Invasive Species Action Network:
Effective January 1, 2012 Rhode Island has banned the use of felt soles in both fresh and salt water. The ban has been implemented administratively as part of the 2012 fishing regulations. It seems that this ban was developed without public notice.
The new rule states “It is prohibited that any person use foot gear with external felt soles in any state waters, inclusive of freshwater, tidal, or marine. This shall include any waters shared with adjacent states in which any Rhode Island Fishing Regulations apply.” The rule is found in the 2012/2013 Rhode Island Fishing Regulations it is regulation #1.17 on page 9.
With the Alaska statewide ban also taking effect on January 1 there will be four states (Alaska, Maryland, Rhode Island and Vermont) with statewide bans. Missouri will be implementing a ban on felt in trout waters effective March 1, 2012
This entry was posted in Conservation, Industry Job Listings and tagged Invasive Species Action Network, Rhode Island Felt Ban. Bookmark the permalink.
 
#3
Just a question. What about parasites hitching a ride on natural carriers, like ducks and geese, or even raccoons?

I have no problem with the ban if it is effective. But I sure do if it is just another bureaucracy power grab. Obviously the zebra mussels would not be a hitchhiker,at least not on wildlife, but whirling disease could be, perhaps. And then there is that pesky problem of non native species being introduced into waterways.
 

Old Man

Just an Old Man
#4
They were talking about it here in Montana last year. Since they banned felt soles in those other states, are they also going to ban the shoelaces in those boots. Just as much shit gets on your laces that get on your felt soles.

This sounds like a political thing.
 

freestoneangler

Not to be confused with Freestone
#7
Washington can't do anything until Kalifornia does first...:rolleyes:
So true Roper...and I'm amazed KA hasn't been at the forefront of the ban the felt crusade -- wonder what's up with that :confused:

I have to say, that my experience is that nothing works as good as felt on most of the treacherous stuff. I tried Korkers tread sole and hated them. I also tried the Simms non-felt sole and found them no better. If I fall and bust my bum, I'm going to file a class action lawsuit :D
 
#8
"Just a question. What about parasites hitching a ride on natural carriers, like ducks and geese, or even raccoons?"

I sure hope they dont ban the ducks, geese and raccoons, I sure like seeing wildlife while I fish.
 
#9
I recall reading that Simms had a lot to do with this and the fact is the laces and the uppers are going to carry whatever just like felt soles.Pure BS meant only to promote sales.I've also never read one good report about the rubber soled boots other than to say they are usable as long as they are studded but trash without.I will never buy a Simms product again.
 
#10
I don't think the main groups who work on these kinds of bans really care about this issue here in the state. They're more focused on larger issues.

I've been told the best way to deal with the problem is wash your boots with a little bleach mixture between trips.
 
#11
I don't think the main groups who work on these kinds of bans really care about this issue here in the state. They're more focused on larger issues.

I've been told the best way to deal with the problem is wash your boots with a little bleach mixture between trips.
I read in the Alaska State report, I believe it was Alaska, well, one of the 57 state's publications, that no one solvent or chemial or process would cure all of the illnesses of the water quality. My own words here. Now I can neither prove nor disprove that bleach will do the trick. I was always told that bleach would kill most anything. But that said, apparently it will not kill mildew or even make it sick. It grows with abandon in my area.

I question the statement that the main groups that work on these kinds of bans are more focused on larger issues. I doubt that they are really focused on much of anything that does not shine and tinkle.

Like the Old man said, I suspect a political statement, or perhaps a commercial effort to steer buyers away from more conventional products to something that NEW AND IMPROVED.
 
#12
I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiments expressed here. Unless legislation can solve ALL OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS CONFRONTING OUR NATURAL WORLD (including the spread of invasive species that harm our fisheries), nothing should be done. This business of picking the low hanging fruit, when it might only solve part of the problem, is NONSENSE.

D

PS: for the rhetorically challenged, this is written with tongue firmly in cheek.
 
#13
I was surprised in a way that so many states had banned felt. I also feel that it is a lot safer for wading than all of those magic rubber soles that have come out in the past couple of years. Remember the articles reviewing them? At the same time, I know that in reality, a lot of anglers will not properly and thoroughly clean their boots after each dunking. And, I think there is solid evidence that invasive species do hitchhike. So what to do? Has anyone looked at the new metal "crampons" Patagonia has come out with? I have not seen them except in ads. I think they are like $200 a pair! And isn't Simms now coming back out with felt again, after ceasing felt sales?
 
#14
Yes, I like the felt soles best, also. I have slipped with rubber soles too many times not to. If it were simply a matter of someone's pride getting wet I guess I would not be concerned so much. But rivers are dangerous places as we all most likely know, and a fall and injury or worse is something to consider in the situation.
I stand by my statement, that if banning felt will fix the problem then ok, let us do it. But I have not seen any solid information that it will accomplish much of anything. I suspect, but have no way to verify this, but perhaps whirling disease spore will adhere to rubber as well as felt. If so, then a ban of felt has accomplished nothing. Same with other species of contamination. I wish I had an answer. I certainly don't. But a move like this without solid science behind it, is just so much fertilizer, another problem.
 

Salmo_g

Well-Known Member
#15
Because the unwanted organisms can hitch a ride on boot laces and material creases as well as the fabric waders are made of, banning felt isn't likely to help. Maybe they should ban wading boots, waders, and the act of wading in rivers.

When felts are outlawed, only OUTLAWs will wear felt.

Sg
 

Latest posts