I've been a part time resident of Montana for 17 years (have been going to Montana for 40 years) and have probably used, and appreciate, the state's fish access sites, and state parks more than most do.
However, I'd like to hear and understand the other side of this issue before contacting anyone to say " Lets keep things as they are now."
Many states already have a separate organization from fish and wildlife organizations to manage, and oversee, their state parks. Are they doing it wrong, and Montana is doing it right? I don't know enough about one way or the other to know if there is a better or more efficient way. Also, isn't Montana already quasi-separately managing its parks now from fish and wildlife? (There is already a Parks and Recreation board separate from the Fish And Wildlife Commission which report separately to the Governor). No?
However, I'd like to hear and understand the other side of this issue before contacting anyone to say " Lets keep things as they are now."
Many states already have a separate organization from fish and wildlife organizations to manage, and oversee, their state parks. Are they doing it wrong, and Montana is doing it right? I don't know enough about one way or the other to know if there is a better or more efficient way. Also, isn't Montana already quasi-separately managing its parks now from fish and wildlife? (There is already a Parks and Recreation board separate from the Fish And Wildlife Commission which report separately to the Governor). No?