I am planning a trip to Lenice next weekend and was wondering if there is any problems fishing during hunting season???????
Seems like a simple rule to me: "Don't f**k with people who have guns!" .... as wide a berth as I can make ....Won-Hyo said:If you're fishing water that is already occupied by duck hunters, meaning they got up at 0 dark:30 and established a blind and set out decoys, it would be common courtesy to not interfere with their activity- give them a wide berth by fishing elsewhere. Do not f%#@ with them. And if there are hunters in the general area, it can't hurt to put on a blaze hat.
Just curious why you consider this to be a faux pas, SC. It doesn't strike me as a particularly bad thing. They have as much right to be there as you, don't they?Salmon Candy said:At Lenice, guys used to carry guns in their boat, toss down their rods when ducks came winging over, pick up the shotguns and blast away. Had shot dimpling the surface many times. Major faux pas in my book.
Well, a duck hunter may very well have an equal right to be on a particular piece of water, but you NEVER have the right to shoot somewhere where your shot might fall on somebody.Dipsnort said:Just curious why you consider this to be a faux pas, SC. It doesn't strike me as a particularly bad thing. They have as much right to be there as you, don't they?![]()
Sorry I wasn't clear as to what I considered to be the faux pas. No issue whatsoever with hunters being where it is legal to hunt. I imagine most if not all, take great issue with any unsafe shooting practices.Dipsnort said:Just curious why you consider this to be a faux pas, SC. It doesn't strike me as a particularly bad thing. They have as much right to be there as you, don't they?![]()
Sageman said:I know if I were hunting, I would not want to be someplace where people would constantly be coming into my field of fire.QUOTE]
Totally agree, but if it were hunting season in a popular hunting area, I wouldn't want to choose that as a fishing destination either. Who has the right of way?
It seems to me that both the hunters and fishers have every right to be there and should go in with the expectation that they will have company on the water. I believe the fisherman should give the hunter a wide berth by fishing a different part of the lake, and if pellets fall from the sky, well, it can't be totally unexpected. If that happened to me (with a legitimate shot at a duck or whatever) I wouldn't dream of confronting the hunter. I'd guess I'm in the minority on this view since we're all fishermen but many of us are probably not hunters. :hmmm:
Exactly. iagreewhynothunt said:Bottom Line for me is and I say this from a hunters point of view, anyone for any reason has the same rights to a public place as any one else. What they are doing is equally as important to them as what we are doing. With that said, everyone has the same responsibilities to make sure that what they are doing will not cause anyone else harm in any way. Picking up a few decoys and moving to a safer place is allot better than being sued for putting someone's eye out or worse. The same idea for fly fishing would be going down to Green Lake when the kiddy pool is full and practicing casting with a fly, just because you got there first does not give you the right to put someone in danger! My 2 cents worth!:ray1:
Right on the money!iagreencitrez said:If the hunters are set up on legally open waters first, they must receive a wide berth - not only for safety, but out of respect for their right to be there. If a fisher decides to "share" the water at that point, it is their responsibility to maintain a safe distance and not foul the hunt for the hunters. Me personally, I wouldn't even enter the water if hunters were already there.
What? You can't tell decs from real ducks?Sageman said:The other problem is that hunters are oftentimes invisible to fishermen when they are in their blinds. A fisherman may paddle right into their field of fire without ever knowing they are there. Especially if the decoys aren't readily apparent.