They are a neat fish. Great photo.
They are still there. I caught a small one about 4" long. It was one of the prettiest fish I ever caught,Nice photo and nice size fish for a MT grayling! I've caught them in the upper tribs of the Big Hole and a while back in the Ruby, where they were trying to re-establish breeding populations. I think they abandoned that effort and I don't know if there are any grayling in the Ruby at this point.
Gee, I wonder what happened to them?I read somewhere that this is one of the last photos taken (around 1886) of the Michigan Grayling, now an extinct species....
![]()
Extensive logging of the watersheds and sluicing logs down the river channels (sound familiar?) was the main culprit according to reports.Gee, I wonder what happened to them?
Jim,I can recall logging but no sluicing of logs down the river channel, nor do I recall my Dad, Uncles or any other "old timers" ever mentioning that. I'd be more inclined to believe that reduced flows, especially in the upper river over the years was a greater threat. The old Montana "10 fish or 10# and 1 fish" liberal limits were probably in force for far too long, also.
Thanks for the continuing education, Greg. That is indeed sad. I'm also sure that over-harvesting/eating contributed to the low numbers in the Big Hole drainage. As in other states & with other species, the "golden age" of fishing & thriving populations was also characterized by liberal limits, less-than-effective conservation & environmental control practices, and the misconception that high population levels/huge runs would always "be around." I shoulder my personal share of the blame - we lived on wild fish & game & although Dad taught me to follow the rules & that certain species should be released (Dad wouldn't keep Bull Trout or Grayling), but as a family we certainly kept lots of other trout species & Whitefish. I guess I was the first generation in our clan to embrace, acknowledge & value the "catch & release" concept and was able to exert at least some influence on others back in the day. Thankfully, "I got a limit" isn't the goal today relative to fishing as it once was and that is a good thing but there is still lots of room for improvement.You are certainly correct in part.
Here's the sad tale of what has been written of what happened to the Michigan Grayling;
That is a sad tale Gregg,Jim,
You are certainly correct in part.
Here's the sad tale of what has been written of what happened to the Michigan Grayling;
https://www.oldausable.com/learn/michigan-grayling-history
Yes. The flesh is much more white, at least where I was. Very good eating compared to the other fish that were available.I hear that grayling taste good. Anyone had one? What does it taste like? Trout? I don't like the taste of trout, so I was curious.