Usually it's a matter of dissolved minerals. Most of our westside rivers are snow and rain fed and also have pretty steep courses. The water is fast, cold and lacking in the mineral content that is necessary to provide nutrients for the microscopic creatures at the very bottom of the food chain. Few diatoms and other phyto- and zooplankton means little food for the insects, which means little food for the fish. Our rivers were probably somewhat richer when the salmon populations were larger and ocean-derived nutrients were brought back up and deposited by the salmon who spawned, died and rotted back into the ecosystem. Numerous recent studies have shown the importance of ocean-derived nutrients not only to the young fish but to streamside vegetation and even to the animals and birds that live near the stream. Estimates of ocean-derived nutrients currently being deposited run to about 10% of historical levels. Experiments on Vancouver Island's Keogh River have shown the benefits of depositing slow-dissolving "briquets" of a mixture of minerals in the river; young fish grew faster prior to smolting, had a higher survival rate in the stream and higher return rates as adults.
The same is true of lakes; with a few exceptions most westside lakes tend to be acid rather than alkaline. The alkaline lakes of eastern Washington have a much greater potential for growing large populations of insects and scuds and, therefore, fish. Can the fertility of westside streams and lakes be improved? Probably not without a great deal of expense and effort. The dumping of hatchery salmon carcasses in the rivers is a step in the right direction, but our salmon runs have declined to such a degree that we have a lo-o-o-o-ng way to go to restore what was, even historically, a relatively low level of fertility.