Washington Fly Fishing Forum banner
1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
1,044 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·


Shasta-Trinity National Forest (California). Proposed legislation would would authorize states to seize millions of acres of national forest land from the U.S. Forest Service.

Credit: Bob Wick (BLM).

"National forests would be turned over to state control and managed for timber production in a bill moving through the House of Representatives.
The latest attempt to seize national public lands comes from Rep. Don Young (R-AK). The State National Forest Management Act would authorize states to seize millions of acres of national forest land from the U.S. Forest Service and prioritize those lands for logging.
Rep. Young's bill would circumvent bedrock environmental laws and effectively take a great, wild national resource-forests prized for wildlife habitat, clean water and outdoor recreation, among many other values-and treat it as merely a means to clear-cut more trees for lumber.

In addition, the House Natural Resources Committee advanced a public lands takeover bill-the Self Sufficient Community Lands Act, introduced by Rep. Raul Labrador (R-ID)-that would allow state governors to appoint "advisory committees" of industry leaders to make management decisions on national forest land. Under these new advisory committees, millions acres of forests could be exempted from key conservation laws meant to protect them in perpetuity.

These troubling proposals would further tip public land management in favor of corporate special interest groups, jeopardizing access to outdoor recreation spots for ordinary Americans. We won't stand for the radical public land takeover movement. Help us by signing a petition to tell elected officials not to sell America's public lands for development.

Reps. Young and Labrador are repeat anti-public lands offenders
This is not Rep. Young's first anti-conservation salvo. In Nov. 2015, he tried to attach a rider to a federal appropriations bill that would have blocked the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from protecting habitat in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Earlier that year, he introduced a bill that would have added arbitrary obstacles to the process of designating national monuments under the Antiquities Act. Previously, Young championed measures to weaken Clean Air Act standards for offshore drilling in the Arctic Ocean.

Rep. Labrador has introduced bills to waive key environmental laws so our national forests could be more easily stripped of timber and bar national monuments in Idaho, among others.

We need to "Keep It Public," not bow to radical forces
These bills and their congressional champions epitomize the fringe-led campaign to wrest national public lands from the American people, often with the end result of industrializing them or selling them off for profit. This movement breaks with decades of tradition and threatens to make public lands into places that may be fenced off or otherwise closed to all but a select few. "

If you are inclined, help fight the movement to lock up public lands: Tell Congress you want to #KeepItPublic.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,512 Posts
If this sort of thing comes to pass, it will be the beginning of the end for public land access. The only ones who will get to be there will be the corporations who pay pennies on the dollar for the right to pillage the water, trees, and ore.

Everyone loves to hate "the Feds". But this isn't a states vs feds freedom issue. It's a people vs the big business issue.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,734 Posts
I just signed petition as well. Important stuff, however...
I am always disappointed when the next page opens up automatically and asks for big donations and the credit card details are already filled in with my info. How about another page with more topics and wildlife areas that need addressing, instead of a huge money drive right off the bat?

Save the timber and land by voting out the bad seeds.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
10,387 Posts
Total Bullshit!!... signed. Also pinged PLWA directors about it, though I suspect they are already aware. Also just noted that the current issue of Trout has a feature on this very subject; it's a good read. Better is Chris Wood's editorial on the subject which had the following very succinct sentence;

"Public lands are the best idea America ever had. For those of us who want to fish and hunt, without having to beg or buy permission, they are a Godsend. To suggest that our land legacy -- a legacy that a kid from New Jersey shares with a rancher in New Mexico -- should be transferred or sold for a pittance is extreme and offensive."

Apparently there are around 50 such bills being floated about the political halls and chambers. They are called "public lands" for a reason. I suspect of the many things this forum finds division on, this particular subject is one the vast majority are unified on... or at least that is my hope. Do us all a favor and take the time to get involved or lend support to organizations, such as Trout Unlimited and Public Land & Water Access, that do the heavy lifting on our behalf.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rapido101
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top