Washington Fly Fishing Forum banner
1 - 20 of 46 Posts

· Banned
Joined
·
1,058 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 · (Edited)
From CNN:

"Interior Department Secretary Ryan Zinke signed an order Friday morning aiming to expand access for hunters and fishers to public lands and monuments.
In what is being described as an "expansive" secretarial order, Zinke's rule would ultimately allow broader access across the board to hunters and fishers on public lands managed by the Interior Department, according to the order.
A section of the order also amends the national monument management plan to include or expand hunting and fishing opportunities to the "extent practicable under the law."

The order cites a 2007 executive order from President George W. Bush to "facilitate the expansion and enhancement of hunting opportunities and the management of game species and their habitat." It directs agencies to to create a report and plan to streamline how best to enhance and expand access to hunting and fishing on public lands.
The Interior Department oversees national parks, wildlife refuges and other federal lands.

The secretarial order also aims to expand educational outreach for hunting and fishing to "under served" communities such as minorities and veterans as well as increase volunteer access to federal lands.

"Today's secretarial order is the latest example of how the Trump administration is actively moving to support hunting and other forms of outdoor recreation on public lands," Zinke said in a statement.

"Hunting and fishing is a cornerstone of the American tradition and hunters and fishers of America are the backbone of land and wildlife conservation," he said.
Interior said Obama administration policies were too restrictive.
"Through management plans made under the previous administration, which did not appreciate access to hunting and target shooting like this administration does, access and usage has been restricted," said Interior spokeswoman Heather Swift.

Zinke's rule will not have to go through a formal rule-making process.
It is the second major action from Interior in the last few weeks.
In August, Zinke recommended shrinking the boundaries of a handful of national monuments, but stopped short of suggesting the elimination of any federal designations following a review ordered by President Donald Trump.

At Trump's direction, Zinke earlier this year launched a review of 27 national monuments, a controversial move that could undo protections for millions of acres of federal lands, as well as limits on oil and gas or other energy production. Interior and the White House have so far resisted releasing the contents of Zinke's full recommendations."
 

· Registered
Joined
·
5,911 Posts
i love public access. why would you not? I also don't like rules. Nothing is a bigger joke then a, "quality hunting spot." All this does is condense all the hunters to a small area and puts a bunch of rules on it like you have to hunt by a stake. which then is not quality in any way or shape. I support free roam areas, hike, fish and hunt where every you think you will have success on public land. there is no need for this giant infrastructure of rules and parking lots and reserve system. saves a lot of money and streamlines the regulations.
 

· Custom Title
Joined
·
12,139 Posts
I draw the line at hunting in National Monuments
We lost big-time when the Feds took over the Monument land along the Columbia. One area is posted to all access, you can't park near "fishy" places, some game species can no longer be hunted there & Pheasants are no longer released. It seemed that the Fed goal was to eliminate reasons people would want to access that area.

I heartily agree with billy's post above.
 
Joined
·
2,426 Posts
I have no issue with what they did on the Columbia. There are plenty of other areas to fish if you can't walk a little bit. And I've always had a bit of a problem with pheasant "releases" during hunting season. Not all that sporting from my standpoint.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
8,816 Posts
I have no issue with what they did on the Columbia. There are plenty of other areas to fish if you can't walk a little bit. And I've always had a bit of a problem with pheasant "releases" during hunting season. Not all that sporting from my standpoint.
No different than fishing on opening day of trout season. As long as the state isn't losing a ton of money running the program and the birds aren't causing problems with native birds i have no problem with it.
 
Joined
·
2,426 Posts
I' "hunted" Scatter Creek years ago on morning of release. It was pretty pathetic. Everybody line up and wait. Ready, set, GO! Everybody shoot. Not my idea of hunting. One and done for me. At least the fish have a bit of a chance to get used to their surroundings. And the fish get to choose who gets to kill them. I've seen birds shot by 3 people, and the ensuing argument over who "got it" has gone either to the comical or the violent direction. I see no sport in any of that.
 

· that's His Lordship, to you.....
Joined
·
6,282 Posts
This is good news, especially for the duck hunters among us. I fear though, that here in WA, nothing will change and it will continue to be ridiculously difficult to actually fill one's tags. I think fish&wildlife would really rather you just watched the game, not actually take food home.......
 

· Custom Title
Joined
·
12,139 Posts
I have no issue with what they did on the Columbia.
It was a great place to take kids & released birds thrived up there and it gave local folks a close to home option - there were a lot of hold-overs. I don't hunt release areas either, but the state does precious little to augment wild bird populations & habitat. Far too many "Feel Free to Hunt" areas resemble parking lots - no cover & no birds.
 

· Custom Title
Joined
·
12,139 Posts
I don't believe that hunting should be allowed in National Parks, however if culling of game species should be required, offer special permits/drawings that allow qualified hunters to be allowed to perform that task instead of Federal "shooters" (such as bison or Elk in Yellowstone.). Unless a fish species is endangered or there is some other valid concern, I see no reason why fishing shouldn't be allowed.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
10,364 Posts
The anti-hunting factions will certainly go apoplectic if National Parks are opened to hunting. Rob's probably correct about it being a source of revenue, but for other than special circumstances and conditions that Jim notes, I would be inclined to not allow that activity.
 
1 - 20 of 46 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top