Joined
·
4,156 Posts
I think I know the Yakima basin well. But I just noticed what appears to be a clear discrepancy between the flows at the Keechelus, Kachess, and Easton dams.
Right now Kachess outflow is 193 cfs: http://www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/nws/hh/basins/data.html?yak+kac
Keechelus is 653 cfs: http://www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/nws/hh/basins/data.html?yak+kee
If I'm not mistaken, Kachess + Keechelus flow into Lake Easton. So the outflow of the Easton Dam should register about 850 cfs since Lake Easton is very small and can't absorb a ton of inflow while restricting outflow (or vice-versa).
Yet Easton outflow registers about 235 cfs: http://www.usbr.gov/pn-bin/graphrt.pl?easw_q
Question: Where is the missing 615 cfs?
I've been tracking this dicrepancy for a few weeks since first noticing it. Granted, the first two flow measures are from a different source than the third, but that seems irrelevant as a cause. Maybe one of the guages is mis-calibrated or broken? Other explanations?
Right now Kachess outflow is 193 cfs: http://www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/nws/hh/basins/data.html?yak+kac
Keechelus is 653 cfs: http://www.nwd-wc.usace.army.mil/nws/hh/basins/data.html?yak+kee
If I'm not mistaken, Kachess + Keechelus flow into Lake Easton. So the outflow of the Easton Dam should register about 850 cfs since Lake Easton is very small and can't absorb a ton of inflow while restricting outflow (or vice-versa).
Yet Easton outflow registers about 235 cfs: http://www.usbr.gov/pn-bin/graphrt.pl?easw_q
Question: Where is the missing 615 cfs?
I've been tracking this dicrepancy for a few weeks since first noticing it. Granted, the first two flow measures are from a different source than the third, but that seems irrelevant as a cause. Maybe one of the guages is mis-calibrated or broken? Other explanations?