Washington Fly Fishing Forum banner
21 - 37 of 37 Posts
Thanks Coastrider, one of #3 reels and spool belong to my son. Never considered them a collection!
The spring and pawl on the new one looks the same. The spring is the weakest link, Ross has been very good about sending me heavy drag springs. The light ones are not strong enough to prevent overrun.
 
I had that issue with my original Colorado reels. I solved the problem by bending the spring slightly to increase the drag tension, and now there is no spool overrun.

Sg
Now you've gone and done it. Suggesting a simple, easy, no-brainer, 5 minute, DIY solution has just reduced to availability of good used reels, sold because they "didn't work right".

TC
 
  • Like
Reactions: Salmo_g and Porter
I found myself an unwilling part of the research and development effort on the very first Colorados that were offered for sale. On the first few times I fished with mine I found that the pawl could be flipped over on its side, sometimes even by an over-enthusiastic strip of the fly line. After sending the reel back and receiving a BS response suggesting that a somewhat stiffer grease applied to the pawl would fix the problem, I sent it back again. This time the problem had been fixed; the addition of a housing around the pawl, with pins on either side to restrict the amount of movement of the pawl, took care of it. Aside from that exchange I have found the Colorado to be an outstanding little reel and have subsequently continued to use it for many years. I like its classically simple looks and can imagine no reason why it should have been changed in any way.

Image
 
I'll remind all you old guys griping about new things that there was a time maybe 20 or 30 or even 50 years ago when reels like the original Ross Colorado or Hardy Featherweight or Orvis CFO were introduced and roundly dismissed and discredited by that era's old men who thought the reels they already had couldn't be improved. I'll bet this new Colorado and others of this generation, if they prove functionally worthy, will be held up by old men in 20 or 30 or even 50 years as classics that shouldn't have been changed but were by the next generation of reel makers. One thing that will always remain the same is the tension between progress and old men.

Now...flame away. I suggest starting with a focus on my use of the word "progress" above. It's the obvious hanging curve ball. :)
 
Lugan,

I'm not high tech, but I'm no Luddite either. I don't know about 50 years ago, but certainly over 40 years ago the Hardy Lightweight series were greeted as great additions to the practical fly fishing line up. Of course, the "progress" included in those reels was limited to lighter aluminum frame construction. The basic materials of stainless steelhead spindle, bronze bushing, and spring and pawl mechanism were carry overs that were already a half century old brought to a new application. The introduction of the CFO was also well received by "old men" because it was an even lighter frame that complimented the introduction of graphite fly rods, light enough that reel weight was losing relevance for rod balancing. In addition, the CFO was machined, with closer tolerances than the traditional Hardy cast aluminum line up. I never heard one single negative comment, other than those who still fished mostly bamboo mentioning that their old reels would continue to see action, but the new CFO would adorn their new lightweight graphite rods.

When I first saw the Ross Colorado I thought this was just what the fly fishing market needed, in part because other high quality spring and pawl reels had been discontinued. I bought two of them and was impressed that if anything, the inherent quality exceeds that of the Hardy lightweight series. Very close tolerances, simplicity in design, and should last an angler's lifetime, and relatively inexpensive.

Comes now the new generation Colorado. My first impression, as stated earlier, is that it looks like gangsta' spinner hubcaps, and gangsta' style is not to my liking. Most notably however, is the price bump from $105 to $285 in a decade that included the recession. What gives? Hence, the real progress will be increased profitability if this reel proves popular. Maybe that's why the original Colorado was discontinued. Not much profit potential in a low priced, high quality reel that lasts forever.

Sg
 
I did like the Daisy petal design of the old Colorado but I'm not so sure about this heart shaped design.
Well, it was nice of them to give a nod to an American classic...the petal design that is.



I'll bet this new Colorado and others of this generation, if they prove functionally worthy, will be held up by old men in 20 or 30 or even 50 years as classics that shouldn't have been changed but were by the next generation of reel makers.
I'd put my money on this horse. In fact...that's exactly what I've done.

 
History repeats itself yet again.

I've never seen that model Pflueger before but I haven't spent much time looking at Pfluegers old or new.

TC
 
When you say "Old" are we talking physical or state of mind? I admit to being a pisces.. with a flair for nostalgia. One glance at that 'thing' was enough for me (smiling) Believe were seeing corporate influence since changing hands. Gonna predict a big flop.. they'll be no market for spare spools decades after the fact. If I'm wrong I'll bump this thread 30 years from now.. oh wait, how will an "old man" be around yet to post?

By the bye.. I've got a original Colorado 3 spool that would let go for way less than that! They are proud of those for sure..
 
I'll remind all you old guys griping about new things that there was a time maybe 20 or 30 or even 50 years ago when reels like the original Ross Colorado or Hardy Featherweight or Orvis CFO were introduced and roundly dismissed and discredited by that era's old men who thought the reels they already had couldn't be improved. I'll bet this new Colorado and others of this generation, if they prove functionally worthy, will be held up by old men in 20 or 30 or even 50 years as classics that shouldn't have been changed but were by the next generation of reel makers. One thing that will always remain the same is the tension between progress and old men.

Now...flame away. I suggest starting with a focus on my use of the word "progress" above. It's the obvious hanging curve ball. :)
Yeah, classic and timeless sucks. Fly-fishing should be more bling, flatter brims,phatter buffs and loud.

It's not progress. It's reinvention to sell sell sell. Nothing more.
 
21 - 37 of 37 Posts